Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstracts
Cardiovascular, Case Report
Cardiovascular, Commentary
Cardiovascular, Editorial
Cardiovascular, Guest Editorial
Cardiovascular, Images in Cardiology
Cardiovascular, Interventional Round
Cardiovascular, Original Article
Cardiovascular, Perspective Review
Cardiovascular, Preface
Cardiovascular, Review Article
Cardiovascular, Student’s Corner
Case Report
Case Report, Cardiovascular
Case Reports
Case Series, Cardiovascular
Clinical Discussion
Clinical Rounds
CPC
Current Issue
Debate
Dedication
Editorial
Editorial Cardiovascular
Editorial, From the Publisher’s Desk
Expert Comments
Expert's Opinion
Genetic Autopsy
Genetics Autopsy
Guest Editorial, Cardiovascular
Image in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology, Cardiovascular
Interventional Round
Interventional Round, Cardiovascular
Interventional Rounds
Letter to Editor
Letter to Editor, Clinical Cardiology
Letter to the Editor
Media and news
Original Article
Original Article, Cardiovascular
Original Article, Cardiovascular Health
Practice in Medicine
Preface
Review Article
Review Article, Cardiovascular
Scientific Paper
Short Communication
Student's Corner
Supplementary
Supplemetary
WINCARS Activities
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstracts
Cardiovascular, Case Report
Cardiovascular, Commentary
Cardiovascular, Editorial
Cardiovascular, Guest Editorial
Cardiovascular, Images in Cardiology
Cardiovascular, Interventional Round
Cardiovascular, Original Article
Cardiovascular, Perspective Review
Cardiovascular, Preface
Cardiovascular, Review Article
Cardiovascular, Student’s Corner
Case Report
Case Report, Cardiovascular
Case Reports
Case Series, Cardiovascular
Clinical Discussion
Clinical Rounds
CPC
Current Issue
Debate
Dedication
Editorial
Editorial Cardiovascular
Editorial, From the Publisher’s Desk
Expert Comments
Expert's Opinion
Genetic Autopsy
Genetics Autopsy
Guest Editorial, Cardiovascular
Image in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology, Cardiovascular
Interventional Round
Interventional Round, Cardiovascular
Interventional Rounds
Letter to Editor
Letter to Editor, Clinical Cardiology
Letter to the Editor
Media and news
Original Article
Original Article, Cardiovascular
Original Article, Cardiovascular Health
Practice in Medicine
Preface
Review Article
Review Article, Cardiovascular
Scientific Paper
Short Communication
Student's Corner
Supplementary
Supplemetary
WINCARS Activities
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstracts
Cardiovascular, Case Report
Cardiovascular, Commentary
Cardiovascular, Editorial
Cardiovascular, Guest Editorial
Cardiovascular, Images in Cardiology
Cardiovascular, Interventional Round
Cardiovascular, Original Article
Cardiovascular, Perspective Review
Cardiovascular, Preface
Cardiovascular, Review Article
Cardiovascular, Student’s Corner
Case Report
Case Report, Cardiovascular
Case Reports
Case Series, Cardiovascular
Clinical Discussion
Clinical Rounds
CPC
Current Issue
Debate
Dedication
Editorial
Editorial Cardiovascular
Editorial, From the Publisher’s Desk
Expert Comments
Expert's Opinion
Genetic Autopsy
Genetics Autopsy
Guest Editorial, Cardiovascular
Image in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology, Cardiovascular
Interventional Round
Interventional Round, Cardiovascular
Interventional Rounds
Letter to Editor
Letter to Editor, Clinical Cardiology
Letter to the Editor
Media and news
Original Article
Original Article, Cardiovascular
Original Article, Cardiovascular Health
Practice in Medicine
Preface
Review Article
Review Article, Cardiovascular
Scientific Paper
Short Communication
Student's Corner
Supplementary
Supplemetary
WINCARS Activities
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
5 (
02
); 102-108
doi:
10.1055/s-0040-1705661

Determinants of Cardiovascular Disease among Urban Women with Psoriasis: A Case–Control Study

Department of Community Medicine, ESIC Medical College, Sanathnagar, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
Department of Dermatology, ESIC Medical College, Sanathanagar, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
Department of Radio-diagnosis, ESIC Medical College, Sanathanagar, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
Department of Rheumatology, ESIC Medical College, Sanathanagar, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Sudha Bala, MBBS, MD Flat No301, 2-2-1075/A, Shubodaya enclave, Baghamberpet, Hyderabad, 500013, Telangana India dr.sudhabala78@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Abstract

Background and Aim Psoriasis have a direct impact on development of cardiovascular risk factors leading to atherosclerosis and metabolic abnormalities. In order to prevent the complications, early and prompt identification of factors through various parameters help in primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) among these psoriatic patients. Therefore the aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of various determinants for cardiovascular diseases among cases and controls.

Methods A hospital based case control study at a tertiary care hospital included women from the out patient department, aged above 18 years who were known cases of psoriasis. 114 patients were recruited with 1:1 ratio between cases and controls. All patients were evaluated using semi structured interview schedule with socio demographic variables, duration of disease, family history, and usage of drugs. Severity of disease was assessed through the psoriasis area severity index (PASI). Body surface area (BSA), body mass index (BMI), waist circumference and blood pressure measurement were done using standard methods. Lipid profile, high sensitivity C-Reactive protein (HsCRP) and blood sugar through calibrated analyzers having quality control. Carotid intima media thickness (CIMT) was assessed by using carotid Doppler technique to measure atherosclerosis.

Results One hundred fourteen patients, means 57 pairs of cases and controls were analyzed in this study. Significant determinants among cases were raised such as waist circumference (p = 0.025), diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.0001), low density lipoprotein (p = 0.002) and fasting blood glucose (p = 0.004) when compared to controls. HsCRP and CIMT were also raised among cases but only CIMT was statistically significant when compared to controls (p = 0.0001). We also found raised determinants among psoriatic arthritis patients compared to psoriasis.

Conclusion Psoriasis patients had high waist circumference, diastolic blood pressure, low density lipoprotein, fasting blood glucose, and CIMT when compared to controls. Early identification of these determinants make them amenable for prevention.

Keywords

cardiovascular disease
psoriasis
HsCRP
CIMT
psoriatic arthritis

Abstract Image

Introduction

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory immune-mediated skin disease with complex etiology. Genetic predisposition and familial clustering have been proven to be associated with psoriasis.1 Environmental factors responsible for psoriasis are psychological stress, obesity, tobacco and alcohol usage, streptococcal and viral infections, lack of sunlight, trauma, and usage of certain medications such as lithium, beta-blockers, and antimalarial drugs.2

According to global psoriasis atlas 2019, the prevalence of psoriasis among adults varies from 0.17% in East Asia to 2.5% in Western Europe. Among South Asians 1.73 billion are affected and in India 1.34 billion are affected with the prevalence of 0.37% (0.007–1.85%).3 All member states of World Health Organization (WHO) have recognized the burden of psoriasis as a major public health problem affecting the quality of life. The main barriers were incorrect or delayed diagnosis, inadequate treatment options, and insufficient access to health care. This encouraged to raise the awareness regarding the disease process and fighting off stigmatization suffered by these people through the global report of 2016.4

Commonly used measures for scoring the severity of psoriasis include the psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) and the physician global assessment. Clinicians assess the severity of the disease, taking into account the degree of scaling, redness, thickness of the skin lesions, or the size of the body surface area (BSA) occupied by psoriasis.5

Psoriasis is associated with increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk because of common pathogenic mechanisms such as Th1 and Th17 cytokine upregulation, T-cell activation, local and systemic expression of adhesion molecules, and endothelin contributing to the development of lesions.6 Carotid intima media thickness serves as an intermediate risk factor which is used as a surrogate marker to predict subclinical atherosclerosis.7 The high sensitivity C-reactive protein (HsCRP) is the most widely evaluated biomarker for global CVD risk prediction.

Moreover, women are more prone to develop this metabolic syndrome which is a major determinant of CVD compared with men mainly due to preponderance to develop central obesity. Identification of these risk factors is very essential to prevent complications and poor management of CVDs especially among women.

There is paucity of data on assessment of various determinants of CVDs specifically among women suffering with psoriasis in Hyderabad. Therefore, an attempt has been made with an objective to assess various determinants of CVDs among psoriasis patients and controls.

Material and Methods

A hospital-based case–control study conducted at tertiary care hospital of Hyderabad for a period of 3 months included women aged above 18 years who were known diagnosed cases of psoriasis attending outpatient block of specialty clinic in the department of rheumatology and dermatology with willingness to participate and free from any of the CVDs were taken as cases, and women above the age of 18 years who were attending general medicine outpatient department free from any of the rheumatologic and skin diseases were considered as controls.

Taking the major cardiovascular determinant—metabolic syndrome as the proportion of exposed controls to calculate the sample size using Open Epi, we had taken 15% of proportion among females from one of our Indian study8; thereby the sample size was 114 with 57 pairs maintaining 1:1 ratio between cases and controls.

Simple random sampling method was used for recruiting the participants. A total of 145 participants (60 cases and 85 controls) were contacted and explained about the importance of the study among women at outpatient block of our hospital. Of this, desired sample of 57 pairs was included in our study.

Institutional ethical committee approval and written consent from the participants were taken after explaining the purpose of the study. Data were collected by the trained faculty under the guidance of dermatologist and rheumatologist using a predesigned, pretested, and precoded questionnaire which consisted of sociodemographic variables, duration of disease, family history, usage of drugs; Severity of disease is done through PASI, BSA, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), blood pressure measurement using standard methods, lipid profile, HsCRP, blood glucose through calibrated analyzers having quality control. carotid intima media thickness (CIMT) was also measured by using carotid Doppler technique. Metabolic syndrome was defined as per the updated Adult Treatment Panel III (ATPIII) criteria which include three or more of the following: triglyceride ≥150 mg/dL, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol <50 mg/dL in women, fasting glucose ≥100 mg/dL, or previously diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, blood pressure ≥130/85 mm Hg, or antihypertensive medication and central obesity (defined as WC ≥80 cm in women, according to the ethnic criteria for Asians).9 Interview questionnaire schedule was developed after pilot testing and necessary changes were incorporated.

As per PASI, head, arms, trunk, and legs were classified with grade 0 to 6: Grade 0 as 0% of involved area, grade 1< 10%, grade 2 (10–29%), grade 3 (30–49%), grade 4 (50–69%), grade 5 (70–89%), and grade 6 (90–100%). Anthropometric measurements using standardized methods were measured. Weight was measured closer to 0.1 kg in light clothing using a bathroom scale (Camry scale) and their height measured with a height measuring rod without wearing foot wear to the nearest 0.1 cm. BMI was calculated according to Asians classification.10 The WC was measured using a tape in a horizontal plane, midway between the inferior margin of the ribs and the superior border of the iliac crest for central obesity assessment. A single blood pressure measurement was done by using standardized procedures in sitting position on right arm using a digital sphygmomanometer (OMRON IAI) which was standardized everyday with diamond mercury sphygmomanometer. If found on higher side an average of three readings was taken with 10 minutes apart and blood pressure levels were classified as per Joint National Committee 7.11

Biochemical Profiles

Fasting blood sugar and lipid profile after overnight fasting of 10 to 12 hours was measured at our hospital. Measurements were done using Cobas C 311 autoanalyzer which involves calorimetric principle for measuring lipid profile and ultraviolet test enzymatic reference method with hexokinase for measuring blood glucose. A total of 3 mL of blood was collected using plain and fluoride containers.

Highly Sensitive C-Reactive Protein

A total of 2 mL of blood was collected using plain tubes and measurement was done using Cobas Integra 400+ involving immune turbidometry method.

Carotid Intima Media Thickness

DC 60 model of Mindray company has been used to measure incorporating advanced ultrasound systems with optimal image quality and a wide range of application capabilities.

Those who were found to have abnormal biochemical and ultrasound (CIMT) findings were referred to the cardiologist at ESIC, super specialty hospital within the campus. They were also advised and educated about the disease process and to maintain adherence to treatment along with preventive strategies to promote healthy life.

Statistical Analysis

Data were entered and analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2015. Frequency, mean ± standard deviation, odds ratio were calculated wherever required. Comparison was made among psoriasis cases and controls. Prevalence of individual components of metabolic syndrome was calculated using mantel Haenszel odds ratio estimate to have better understanding. Subpopulation was also assessed among cases as psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis patients.

Results

Our study included 114 women consisting of 54 cases of psoriasis and 54 controls in 1:1 ratio who were free from coronary artery disease and stroke.

Mean age of the cases was found to be 40.70 ± 10.95 years and controls was 33.42 ± 6.96 years, respectively. According to religion the cases were Hindus 48 (84%), Muslims 5 (9%), and Christians 4 (7%) and among controls—Hindus were 42 (74%), Muslims 4 (7%) and Christians 11 (19%), respectively. As per their marital status the cases included—6 (10%) unmarried, 45 (80%) married, 6 (10%) widows and controls included—unmarried 16 (27%), married 40 (70%), and 1 (3%) widows. Among psoriatic patients illiterates were 25 (44%) and literates 32 (56%) and controls—illiterates 14 (25%) and literates 43 (75%). Working group among cases was contributed by 25 (44%) and nonworking group 32 (56%); Controls included working group with 55 (97%) and 2 (3%) as nonworking group. Based on modified BG Prasad’s classification cases 16 (28%) belonged to upper class, 18 (32%) belonged to upper middle class, and 23 (40%) middle class; Among controls 28 (49%) belonged to upper class, 11 (19%) upper middle class, 12 (22%) middle class, and 6 (10%) to upper lower class. Psoriasis among our study subjects manifested as plaque psoriasis/psoriasis vulgaris among 29 (51%), followed by psoriatic arthritis 14 (25%), palmoplantar 12 (21%), and guttate 2 (3%). Body surface area of minimum 1% was found among 6 (10%) and maximum of 5% among 8 (14%) mean PASI score was 7.14 + 3.22 and mean duration of disease was 7.75 ± 5.23 years. PASI score was found to be increasing with duration which was statistically significant (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1 Relationship between PASI score and duration. Mean scores of PASI with duration of disease statistically significant (p-value: 0.004). PASI, psoriasis area severity index.

Fig. 1 Relationship between PASI score and duration. Mean scores of PASI with duration of disease statistically significant (p-value: 0.004). PASI, psoriasis area severity index.

Traditional, biochemical, and ultrasonographical determinants of CVDs among psoriasis patients and controls were assessed using independent t-test as detailed in Table 1. There was a statistical significance with determinants such as WC, diastolic blood pressure, and LDL.

Table 1
Various determinants of cardiovascular diseases among cases (psoriatic patients) and controls

Determinants

Cases (n = 57)

Controls (n = 57)

p-Value

Abbreviation: HsCrp, high sensitivity C-reactive protein.

Weight

63.82 ± 11.66

63.14 ± 11.43

0.752

Waist circumference

85.57 ± 8.79

82.17 ± 7.08

0.025

Systolic blood pressure

119.45 ± 32.62

115.85 ± 11.87

0.436

Diastolic blood pressure

83.96 ± 9.96

77.86 ± 7.45

0.0001

Total cholesterol

161.52 ± 34.42

156.78 ± 32.46

0.451

Triglycerides

145.73 ± 72.95

143.94 ± 62.83

0.889

High-density lipoprotein

45.17 ± 10.21

42.84 ± 10.54

0.233

Low-density lipoprotein

88.12 ± 29.76

76.19 ± 24.78

0.002

Very low-density protein

25.77 ± 12.13

26.87 ± 12.10

0.627

HsCrp

1.05 ± 2.46

0.57 ± 0.43

0.150

Alcohol usage was found among 2 (3.5%) of cases and none among controls; tobacco usage was found among 4 (7%) of cases and 2 (3.5%) of controls; sedentary 22 (38%) and moderate lifestyle 35 (62%) were equally found among cases and controls; extraphysical activity was found only among controls 22 (38%); history of hypertension 6 (10%) among cases and 1 (2%) controls; history of diabetes mellitus was found only among cases 8 (14%). Others included family history of hypertension/diabetes among cases 36 (63%) and 38 (66%) among controls; any form of stress 15 (26%) among cases and 14 (24%) of controls was noted. These were small in number so no significance could be elicited.

Body mass index as per Asians classification 2 (3%) of cases were underweight, normal were 4 (7%) among cases and 10 (17%) among controls, overweight 7 (12%) among cases and controls equally and obese were 44 (78%) among cases and 40 (71%) among controls. As per joint national committee 7 prevalence of prehypertension was found among 4 (7%) of cases and 9 (16%) of controls; hypertension-I among 17 (30%) of cases and 5 (9%) of controls and hypertension-II only among 4 (100%) of cases.

As per updated ATP III prevalence of metabolic syndrome was found to be higher among cases 32 (56%) than among controls 13 (23%) detailed in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2 Prevalence of metabolic syndrome as per updated NCEP ATP III among cases and controls. ATP, adult treatment panel; NCEP, National Cholesterol Education Program.

Fig. 2 Prevalence of metabolic syndrome as per updated NCEP ATP III among cases and controls. ATP, adult treatment panel; NCEP, National Cholesterol Education Program.

The prevalence of individual components of the metabolic syndrome (MS) according to the presence of psoriasis is depicted in Table 2 where WC, hypertriglyceridemia, low HDL, raised blood glucose, and raised blood pressure were significantly more prevalent in psoriasis cases as compared with controls. CIMT on right and left carotid arteries was measured and this was taken as increased if either side was above 0.07 cm or 0.7 mm. This was found statistically significant among cases. HsCRP was also raised among cases compared with controls but was statistically nonsignificant (Table 3). This increase was statistically significant with duration of psoriasis among cases (Table 4).

Table 2
Components of metabolic syndrome among cases and controls

Component

Psoriasis cases

N = 57

Controls

N = 57

Odds ratioa (CI)

p-Value

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HDL, high-density lipoprotein.

aOdds ratio was calculated using Mantel Haenszel estimate.

Raised waist circumference

(>80 cm)

35 (61%)

29 (50%)

0.651 (0.309–1.370)

0.347

Raised triglycerides

(>150 mg/dL)

25 (43%)

24 (42%)

0.931 (0.443–1.955)

1.000

Low HDL(<50)

39 (68%)

44 (77%)

1.562 (0.679–3.595)

0.402

Fasting blood glucose

(>100 mg/dL)

23 (40%)

9 (16%)

0.277 (0.114–0.673)

0.004

Raised blood pressure

21 (37%)

5 (8%)

0.165 (0.057–0.478)

0.001

Table 3
Elevated biomarker (HsCRP) and carotid intima media thickness among cases and controls

Cases

Controls

Odds ratio (CI)

p-Value

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CIMT, carotid intima media thickness; HsCrp, high sensitivity C-reactive protein.

Biomarker (Raised HsCrp)

N = 42

23 (55%)

19 (45%)

0.739 (0.344–1.586)

0.562

Raised CIMT (N = 26)

25 (96%)

1 (4%)

0.023 (0.003–0.177)

0.0001

Table 4
Paired sample t-test between duration and HsCRP

Paired t-test

Mean + SD

p-Value

Abbreviation: HsCrp, high sensitivity C-reactive protein; SD, standard deviation.

Duration

7.75 + 5.23

0.0001

HsCRP

1.05 + 2.46

On comparison of psoriatic arthritis (Psa; N = 43) and psoriatic (Ps; N = 14) women the following results were found: raised WC (Psa25 (58%) vs. Ps10 [71%]), triglycerides (18[42%] vs. 7[50%]), blood glucose (12[30%] vs. 11[78%]), blood pressure (12[28%] vs. 9[64%]), HsCRP (14[32%] vs. 9[64%]), and CIMT (19[44%] vs. 6[43%]).

Discussion

Our study found majority of the women were Hindus (84%) and were married (80%) with literacy status of 56 and 40% of them belonging to middle class among cases. Among controls—Hindus (74%) and 70% were married with literacy status of 75 and 49% of them belonging to upper class.

Psoriasis vulgaris was found among 51% of the women followed by psoriatic arthritis among 25%. Mean PASI score was 7.14 ± 3.22 with 5% involvement of BSA. Kudligi et al in their study at Hubli also found most common type of psoriasis as psoriasis vulgaris 91% and mean PASI score as 15.75 which is much higher than our study. Contrast to our study no statistical significance of severity with duration of disease was noted.12

Our findings depicted raised mean scores of determinants such as weight, WC, systolic, diastolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL, fasting blood glucose, and HsCRP among cases. Contrast to our study Owczarczyk et al reported triglycerides and systolic blood pressure to be lesser among Polish psoriasis patients.13

As per the subcategorization of psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis women we found raised WC, triglycerides, blood glucose, blood pressure, HsCRP, and CIMT in our study. This was similar to Landgren et al in their study among Swedish psoriatic arthritis women where obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia were raised compared with controls.14

In our study prevalence of metabolic syndrome among psoriasis patients was 56 and 23% among controls, respectively as per updated ATP III with major components that were statistically significant were raised blood glucose and raised blood pressure. Similar to our study Milčić et al found metabolic syndrome among 50% of Serbian psoriatic women which is closer to our study.15 In Indian set up also Singh et al in their case–control study at Chandigarh found MS among 45.6% of women psoriatic patients and 15.3% of women controls with significant components of raised WC, triglycerides, blood glucose, and blood pressure.8 These determinants variation can be explained by different ethnicity, different lifestyle, and varying personal habits.

Our study found raised HsCRP among 55% of the cases and 45% of controls along with raised CIMT (cases 96% and controls 4%). Similarly Vadakayil et al in their study in south India to determine the role of CRP as a marker of disease severity and cardiovascular risk found CRP to be significantly elevated in psoriatic patients when compared with controls (52 vs. 14%).16 The level of HsCRP indicates the inflammatory changes occurring at an earlier process of atherosclerosis acting as an added risk factor. Kothiwala in their study also found statistically significant mean scores in both common carotid arteries with cases having scores 0.61 ± 0.01 mm and controls 0.37 ± 0.01 mm, respectively.17 This novel finding of increased thickness of CIMT supports the role of inflammatory response as a mechanism that may lead to increased cardiovascular morbidity among psoriatic patients.

Conclusion

Metabolic syndrome—a major determinant of CVDs was found to have increased trend among psoriasis patients and its components need to be targeted at primary level. Role of HsCRP—the inflammatory biomarker of atherosclerosis and CIMT used as a surrogate marker for measurement of subclinical atherosclerotic changes proved a crucial rise among psoriatic and psoriatic arthritis patients which stresses the benefits of early screening among them as a secondary level of preventive strategy.

This study requires to be followed up as cohorts to strengthen our judgment of causality in near future which could be one of the limitations for the establishment of association.

Acknowledgments

We extend our thanks to Dr. A. Dhanlakshmi, Department of Biochemistry, ESIC Medical College and Hospital, Dr. Imran Siddiqui, Department of Biochemistry, ESIC Super specialty hospital, Hyderabad for their support, laboratory technician Mr. Venkatesh and all the cases and controls.

Conflict of Interest

None.

Funding Prajwalika scholarship stipend, Women in cardiology and related sciences (WINCARS), faculty 2019.

References

  1. , , . The natural history of psoriasis in 5,600 patients. Dermatologica. 1974;148(01):1-18.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , . Risk factors for psoriasis. Curr Dermatol Rep. 2013;2:58-65.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Global psoriasis atlas-International federation of psoriasis. Available at: http://www.psoriasiscouncil.org. Accessed November 13, 2019 global-psoriasis-atlas
  4. World Health Organization 2016. Global report on psoriasis. World Health Organization. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/204417
  5. , , , et al . European Dermato-Epidemiology Network. Randomized clinical trials for psoriasis 1977-2000: the EDEN survey. J Invest Dermatol. 2003;120(05):738-741.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , et al . Aortic arterial stiffness is a moderate predictor of cardiovascular disease in patients with psoriasis vulgaris. Angiology. 2014;65(01):74-78.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , . Prediction of clinical cardiovascular events with carotid intima-media thickness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation. 2007;115(04):459-467.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , . Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in psoriasis and levels of Interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-αin psoriasis patients with metabolic syndrome: Indian Tertiary Care Hospital study. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2017;7(03):169-175.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , . The metabolic syndrome—a new worldwide definition. Lancet. 2005;366:1059-1062. (9491)
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , . Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet. 2004;363:157-163. (9403)
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , et al , , . The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289(19):2560-2572.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , . Bhagwat PV, Asati DP, Dhayaneethi E, Kaivalyam. A clinical study of psoriasis and its association with co-morbid conditions. J Pak Assoc Dermatol. 2016;26(04):298-305.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , . Prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors, and metabolic syndrome and its components in patients with psoriasis aged 30 to 49 years. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2015;32(04):290-295.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , et al . Cardiovascular risk factors are highly overrepresented in Swedish patients with psoriatic arthritis compared with the general population. Scand J Rheumatol. 2019;49(03):195-199.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , et al . Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in patients with psoriasis: a hospital-based cross-sectional study. An Bras Dermatol. 2017;92(01):46-51.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , . Role of C-reactive protein as a marker of disease severity and cardiovascular risk in patients with psoriasis. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2015;6(05):322-325.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , et al . Prevalence of metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular changes in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis and their correlation with disease severity: a hospital-based cross-sectional study. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2016;82(05):510-518.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections