Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstracts
Cardiovascular, Case Report
Cardiovascular, Commentary
Cardiovascular, Editorial
Cardiovascular, Guest Editorial
Cardiovascular, Images in Cardiology
Cardiovascular, Interventional Round
Cardiovascular, Original Article
Cardiovascular, Perspective Review
Cardiovascular, Preface
Cardiovascular, Review Article
Cardiovascular, Student’s Corner
Case Report
Case Report, Cardiovascular
Case Reports
Case Series, Cardiovascular
Clinical Discussion
Clinical Rounds
CPC
Current Issue
Debate
Dedication
Editorial
Editorial Cardiovascular
Editorial, From the Publisher’s Desk
Expert Comments
Expert's Opinion
Genetic Autopsy
Genetics Autopsy
Guest Editorial, Cardiovascular
Image in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology, Cardiovascular
Interventional Round
Interventional Round, Cardiovascular
Interventional Rounds
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Media and news
Original Article
Original Article, Cardiovascular
Original Article, Cardiovascular Health
Practice in Medicine
Preface
Review Article
Review Article, Cardiovascular
Scientific Paper
Short Communication
Student's Corner
Supplementary
Supplemetary
WINCARS Activities
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstracts
Cardiovascular, Case Report
Cardiovascular, Commentary
Cardiovascular, Editorial
Cardiovascular, Guest Editorial
Cardiovascular, Images in Cardiology
Cardiovascular, Interventional Round
Cardiovascular, Original Article
Cardiovascular, Perspective Review
Cardiovascular, Preface
Cardiovascular, Review Article
Cardiovascular, Student’s Corner
Case Report
Case Report, Cardiovascular
Case Reports
Case Series, Cardiovascular
Clinical Discussion
Clinical Rounds
CPC
Current Issue
Debate
Dedication
Editorial
Editorial Cardiovascular
Editorial, From the Publisher’s Desk
Expert Comments
Expert's Opinion
Genetic Autopsy
Genetics Autopsy
Guest Editorial, Cardiovascular
Image in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology, Cardiovascular
Interventional Round
Interventional Round, Cardiovascular
Interventional Rounds
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Media and news
Original Article
Original Article, Cardiovascular
Original Article, Cardiovascular Health
Practice in Medicine
Preface
Review Article
Review Article, Cardiovascular
Scientific Paper
Short Communication
Student's Corner
Supplementary
Supplemetary
WINCARS Activities
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstracts
Cardiovascular, Case Report
Cardiovascular, Commentary
Cardiovascular, Editorial
Cardiovascular, Guest Editorial
Cardiovascular, Images in Cardiology
Cardiovascular, Interventional Round
Cardiovascular, Original Article
Cardiovascular, Perspective Review
Cardiovascular, Preface
Cardiovascular, Review Article
Cardiovascular, Student’s Corner
Case Report
Case Report, Cardiovascular
Case Reports
Case Series, Cardiovascular
Clinical Discussion
Clinical Rounds
CPC
Current Issue
Debate
Dedication
Editorial
Editorial Cardiovascular
Editorial, From the Publisher’s Desk
Expert Comments
Expert's Opinion
Genetic Autopsy
Genetics Autopsy
Guest Editorial, Cardiovascular
Image in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology, Cardiovascular
Interventional Round
Interventional Round, Cardiovascular
Interventional Rounds
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Media and news
Original Article
Original Article, Cardiovascular
Original Article, Cardiovascular Health
Practice in Medicine
Preface
Review Article
Review Article, Cardiovascular
Scientific Paper
Short Communication
Student's Corner
Supplementary
Supplemetary
WINCARS Activities
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
03 (
02/03
); 189-192
doi:
10.1055/s-0038-1677057

The Effect of Nicoumalone on Embryogenesis: A Retrospective Study

Department of Pharmacy Practice, Sree Vidyanikethan College of Pharmacy, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India
Department of Cardiology, Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad
Department of Cardiology, SVIMS, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India
Department of Pharmacology, Sree Vidyanikethan College of Pharmacy, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India
Address for correspondence Kumar Achukatla, Pharm D Department of Cardiology, Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences Punjagutta, 500082, Hyderabad, Telangana India achukatlakumar@gmail.com
Licence
This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Abstract

Objective To study the effect of nicoumalone on embryogenesis in women who have undergone mechanical heart valve replacement surgery.

Design It is a retrospective study done at Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences (SVIMS), Tirupati.

Results Total 28 pregnancies were reported in 12 women with mechanical heart valve prostheses. Of these, 19 were live births, 9 abortions, and no stillbirths and miscarriages were noted in pregnant women. There were 11 hemorrhagic, 3 neurologic, 2 thromboembolic, and 1 stuck valve complications observed in mothers; and 2 low birth weights, 2 pneumonia, and 1 jaundice observed in the child.

Conclusion There were no abnormalities observed in children whose mothers were taking nicoumalone throughout pregnancy based on echo results and clinical examination.

Keywords

nicoumalone
pregnancy
mechanical valve prostheses

Introduction

Valvular heart disease (VHD) is one of the major causes of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, with rheumatic heart disease (RHD) being the most common cause.1 The prevalence of VHD is greater in developed countries (2.5%), where the frequency of RHD is decreased and it is compensated by the increased frequency of degenerative valve disease.2 However, RHD is the main cause in developing countries such as India.3

Valvular heart diseases can be managed by either drug therapy (e.g., oral anticoagulants [coumarin derivatives], low-molecular-weight heparin [LMWH], unfractionated heparin [UFH], and low-dose aspirin) or surgical treatment.4 Heart valve replacement is the last stage of treatment in these patients. There are two types of prosthetic heart valve replacement (PHVR) currently in use: mechanical and bioprosthetic. Mechanical valves are more commonly used than bioprosthetic valves due to more durability and less risk of reoperation rate.

Women with reproductive age are implanted with mechanical valve prostheses due to its longevity, but they require lifelong anticoagulation therapy. The risk of prosthetic valve thrombosis is higher with mechanical valves compared with bioprosthetic and homograft. During pregnancy, the hormonal changes affect the heart valves as the increase in levels of estrogen hormone leads to the valve thrombus, even on with anticoagulant therapy.5 The physiologic changes in pregnancy such as an increase in plasma volume, cardiac output, and hypercoagulability in them due to increased plasma concentration of fibrinogen, factors VII, VIII, and X, and plasminogen activator inhibitor contribute to the increased incidence of thromboembolic (TE) events during pregnancy. Anticoagulant therapy is essential to reduce the TE events throughout pregnancy.6 During anticoagulant therapy, pregnant women are monitored with prothrombin time (PT) and international normalized ratio (INR) due to increased risk of TE events with anticoagulants and mechanical valves, so PT-INR monitoring must be done in pregnant women.

Previously the anticoagulant warfarin was recommended in pregnant women after prosthetic heart valve replacement. However, it crosses the placenta and produces fetal abnormalities such as congenital heart defects, ventriculomegaly, facial dysmorphism, and growth retardation, etc.6 7 To overcome these effects, in the past few years, pregnant women with mechanical prosthesis were recommended with nicoumalone, a vitamin K antagonist (VKA). It has many advantages such as rapid onset of action,8 9 better stability,10 11 and no fetal abnormalities. But the major side effect of nicoumalone is bleeding complications.12

Previous studies were mainly focused on the influence of anticoagulation regimen in pregnant women with prosthetic heart valves. There has been a little investigation done on maternal and infant outcomes and also the safety of nicoumalone in children. The current study was undertaken to find out the safety of nicoumalone in children.

Methods and Materials

Study Site

Department of Cardiology and Cardiothoracic surgery in Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences (SVIMS), Tirupati.

Study Period

Six months (December 2016 to May 2017).

Study Design

Retrospective study.

Ethical Considerations

The research project was approved by the institutional ethics committee at SVIMS under IEC number 615.

Methodology

Female patients aged ≤ 35 years with a prosthetic heart valve who were taking nicoumalone throughout pregnancy are included and pregnant women who used other drugs that cause fetal anomalies and also pregnant women who switched to heparin therapy are excluded. The demographic, clinical, and surgical information were taken from the case sheets, treatment charts, and recorded in a specifically prepared proforma. The selection of prosthetic valve (mechanical or bio prosthetic) was based on the preoperative discussion between the surgeon, patient, and their family members. The surgeon gives the detailed information regarding the advantages and disadvantages of prosthetic valves such as requirement of anticoagulant therapy after mechanical valve replacement or a possible requirement of reoperation after bioprosthetic valve replacement. The decision of the prosthetic valve selection was entirely left to patients and their family members.13 Informed consent was taken from all patients after explaining the nature of the study. During the follow-up visit, the clinical examination and echo were done to the children born to mothers who were taking nicoumalone throughout pregnancy.

The study plan is represented in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1 Plan of study.

Fig. 1 Plan of study.

Results

Twenty-eight pregnancies were reported in 12 women. Of these, 19 live births and 9 abortions were noted and no stillbirths and miscarriages. There were 10 (83.4%) mitral, 1 (8.3%) aortic, and 1 (8.3) double-valve replacements done. The mode of delivery of these women is normal (17) and cesarean (4). There were 11 hemorrhagic, 3 neurologic, 2 thromboembolic, and 1 stuck valve complications observed in the mother (Table 1); and 2 low birth weights, 2 pneumonia, and 1 jaundice observed in the child. There were no congenital or birth defects seen in live births(Table 2).

Discussion

Anticoagulation therapy is necessary for the pregnant women with a mechanical heart valve, but the management of anticoagulation therapy is a difficult challenge because it should give adequate protection from thrombotic events as well as without causing harm to the unborn child.

As per ACC/AHA (American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association) 2014 guidelines, VKA are required to use to attain the therapeutic INR in the second and third trimesters and initiate UFH intravenously before planned vaginal delivery after discontinuation of VKA.14 15

It is recommended that VKA be switched to LMWH or UFH in cesarean delivery at 34 to 36 weeks at around 38 weeks. UFH should be started intravenously at approximately 24 hours prior to labor induction or cesarean and should be stopped once in labor or 6 hours prior to anesthesia administration confirming activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) back to baseline. UFH needs to restart at 4 to 6 hours after normal delivery or 6 to 12 hours after cesarean delivery with 500 IU/h and increase over 24 to 48 hours to target aPTT. VKA should be restarted on first day of postpartum (uncomplicated vaginal delivery) or second to third day if cesarean or bleeding complications occur.16 As per D’Souza et al, the use of UFH throughout pregnancy is not supported.17

In our study, patients who took nicoumalone throughout the pregnancy were included and patients who took anticoagulant based on the guideline were excluded. In this study, 19 live births and 9 abortions were noted and there were no stillbirths and miscarriages. Abortions may occur due to consanguinity marriages or TE events. The study conducted by Tounsi et al confirmed that there were 1 abortion, 33 live births, 5 stillbirths, and 1 maternal death.18

The complications observed in the mother are bleeding, stroke, seizure, and stuck valve. These complications are more in number in mitral valve replacements. A study conducted by Ahamad confirmed that few patients who were taking acenocoumarol had developed central nervous system events and features of peripheralembolization.19 The postprocedural symptoms such as a cough, chest pain, palpitations, etc. were observed. The complications observed in the child are low birth weight, pneumonia, and jaundice. Apgar score is a method used to assess a neonate after birth in response to resuscitation. The factors such as color, heart rate, reflexes, muscle tone, and respiration were assessed. The score is recorded at 1 and 5 minutes after birth.20

Conclusion

In this study, there were no congenital, physical, or neurologic abnormalities seen in children whose mothers were taking nicoumalone throughout pregnancy with prosthetic heart valves. These are assessed based on echo results and clinical examination periodically done by the physician. The low birth weight, jaundice, and pneumonia in children were not associated with nicoumalone therapy. Therefore, we conclude that the nicoumalone is safe in pregnant women with the mechanical prosthetic valve.

Limitations

  • Sample size is small.

  • It is a single centered trail.

Table 1
Maternal outcomes

Mother characteristics

Results

Abbreviations: AVR, aortic valve replacement; DVR, double-valve replacement; MVR, mitral valve replacement.

1. Valve site

MVR

10 (83.4%)

AVR

1 (8.3%)

DVR

1 (8.3%)

2. Delivery

Normal

9 (75%)

Cesarean

3 (25%)

3. Nicoumalone dose per week (mg)

0–10

1 (8.3%)

11–20

8 (66.7%)

21–30

3 (25%)

4. Prenatal outcomes

Live births

19

Abortions

9

Still births

0

5. Complications

Hemorrhagic

11

Neurologic

3

Thromboembolic

2

Stuck valve

1

Table 2
Child outcomes

Child characteristics

Results

1. Sex

Male

10

Female

9

2. Complications

Low birth weight

2

Pneumonia

2

Jaundice

1

References

  1. , . Rheumatic heart disease in developing countries. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(05):439-441.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , . Changing demographics of valvular heart disease and impact on surgical and transcatheter valve therapies. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;27(08):1115-1122.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . Epidemiology of acquired valvular heart disease. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30(09):962-970.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , . Anticoagulation of pregnant women with mechanical heart valves: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(02):191-194.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , . Expected and unexpected cardiac problems during pregnancy. Neth Heart J. 2008;16(12):403-405.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , . Long-term relative survival rates after heart valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15(03):566-573.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , . Maternal and fetal sequelae of anticoagulation during pregnancy. Am J Med. 1980;68(01):122-140.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , . Clinical evaluation of a new oral anticoagulant Sintrom. Circulation. 1957;15(05):713-720.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , . Clinical evaluation of acenocoumarol (Sintrom), an anticoagulant of intermediate range. J Am Med Assoc. 1958;168(06):734-737.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , et al . Better stability of acenocoumarol compared to warfarin treatment in one-year observational, clinical study in patients with nonvalvular AF. Med GlasLjekkomoreZenicko-dobojkantona. 2011;8:9-14.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , . Warfarin or acenocoumarol is better in the anticoagulant treatment of chronic AF? [in Hungarian] Orv Hetil. 2004;145:2619-2621.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , et al . Acenocoumarol: a review of anticoagulant efficacy and safety. J Assoc Physicians India. 2016;64(02):88-93.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , et al . Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;30(03):485-491.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , et al . 2017 AHA/ACC focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(02):252-289.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , et al . 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129(23):2440-2492.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , . Maternal complications and pregnancy outcome in women with mechanical prosthetic heart valves treated with enoxaparin. BJOG. 2009;116(12):1585-1592.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , et al . Anticoagulation for pregnant women with mechanical heart valves: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(19):1509-1516.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , et al . Anticoagulation in pregnant women with mechanical heart valve prostheses: 25-year experience at a tertiary care hospital in a developing country. World J Cardiovasc Dis. 2014;4(06):287-293.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , . Role of acenocoumarol in prosthetic heart valves. JIMD. 2015;2(03):180-185.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Simon LV, Bragg BN. APGAR Score. StatPearls, November 29, 2017
Show Sections