Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstracts
Cardiovascular, Case Report
Cardiovascular, Commentary
Cardiovascular, Editorial
Cardiovascular, Guest Editorial
Cardiovascular, Images in Cardiology
Cardiovascular, Interventional Round
Cardiovascular, Original Article
Cardiovascular, Perspective Review
Cardiovascular, Preface
Cardiovascular, Review Article
Cardiovascular, Student’s Corner
Case Report
Case Report, Cardiovascular
Case Reports
Case Series, Cardiovascular
Clinical Discussion
Clinical Rounds
CPC
Current Issue
Debate
Dedication
Editorial
Editorial Cardiovascular
Editorial, From the Publisher’s Desk
Expert Comments
Expert's Opinion
Genetic Autopsy
Genetics Autopsy
Guest Editorial, Cardiovascular
Image in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology, Cardiovascular
Interventional Round
Interventional Round, Cardiovascular
Interventional Rounds
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Media and news
Original Article
Original Article, Cardiovascular
Original Article, Cardiovascular Health
Practice in Medicine
Preface
Review Article
Review Article, Cardiovascular
Scientific Paper
Short Communication
Student's Corner
Supplementary
Supplemetary
WINCARS Activities
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstracts
Cardiovascular, Case Report
Cardiovascular, Commentary
Cardiovascular, Editorial
Cardiovascular, Guest Editorial
Cardiovascular, Images in Cardiology
Cardiovascular, Interventional Round
Cardiovascular, Original Article
Cardiovascular, Perspective Review
Cardiovascular, Preface
Cardiovascular, Review Article
Cardiovascular, Student’s Corner
Case Report
Case Report, Cardiovascular
Case Reports
Case Series, Cardiovascular
Clinical Discussion
Clinical Rounds
CPC
Current Issue
Debate
Dedication
Editorial
Editorial Cardiovascular
Editorial, From the Publisher’s Desk
Expert Comments
Expert's Opinion
Genetic Autopsy
Genetics Autopsy
Guest Editorial, Cardiovascular
Image in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology, Cardiovascular
Interventional Round
Interventional Round, Cardiovascular
Interventional Rounds
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Media and news
Original Article
Original Article, Cardiovascular
Original Article, Cardiovascular Health
Practice in Medicine
Preface
Review Article
Review Article, Cardiovascular
Scientific Paper
Short Communication
Student's Corner
Supplementary
Supplemetary
WINCARS Activities
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstracts
Cardiovascular, Case Report
Cardiovascular, Commentary
Cardiovascular, Editorial
Cardiovascular, Guest Editorial
Cardiovascular, Images in Cardiology
Cardiovascular, Interventional Round
Cardiovascular, Original Article
Cardiovascular, Perspective Review
Cardiovascular, Preface
Cardiovascular, Review Article
Cardiovascular, Student’s Corner
Case Report
Case Report, Cardiovascular
Case Reports
Case Series, Cardiovascular
Clinical Discussion
Clinical Rounds
CPC
Current Issue
Debate
Dedication
Editorial
Editorial Cardiovascular
Editorial, From the Publisher’s Desk
Expert Comments
Expert's Opinion
Genetic Autopsy
Genetics Autopsy
Guest Editorial, Cardiovascular
Image in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology, Cardiovascular
Interventional Round
Interventional Round, Cardiovascular
Interventional Rounds
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Media and news
Original Article
Original Article, Cardiovascular
Original Article, Cardiovascular Health
Practice in Medicine
Preface
Review Article
Review Article, Cardiovascular
Scientific Paper
Short Communication
Student's Corner
Supplementary
Supplemetary
WINCARS Activities
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
02 (
03
); 029-034
doi:
10.1055/s-0037-1607056

Right Ventricular Infarction in Inferior Wall Myocardial Infarction

Department of Cardiology, SVIMS, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India
Department of SPM, S.V. Medical College, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India
Department of Medicine, SVIMS, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India

Velam Vanajakshamma, MD, DM Department of Cardiology, SVIMS Tirupati 517507, Andhra Pradesh India vvanaja1966@yahoo.in

Licence
This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Women in Cardiology and Related Sciences and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Abstract

Background Right ventricular infarction (RVI) is common in patients with inferior wall myocardial infarction (IWMI). Right ventricular involvement increases mortality and morbidity in IWMI patients. Clinical presentation of RVI differs, and accordingly treatment and management of patients also differs.

Aim To find out the frequency of RVI among patients with acute IWMI and to determine the utility of clinical examination, electrocardiography (ECG), and echocardiography (ECHO) in the diagnosis of RVI and its severity. Also o study the frequency and complications with reference to sex.

Material and Methods One hundred patients with acute IWMI were recruited. Clinical examination, ECG with right precordial leads, and 2D ECHO (right ventricular end-systolic volume [RVESV] and right ventricular end-diastolic volume [RVEDV], right ventricular stroke volume [RVSV], RVESV index [RVESVI], RVEDV index [RVEDVI], RVSV index [RVSVI], and right ventricular ejection fraction [RVEF]) were done to diagnose RVI and its severity. RVI patients were divided into two groups basing on RVEF as severe RVI (EF < 35%) and mild RVI (EF > 35%).

Results Forty-three (43%) patients had RVI. Thirty-one (72%) patients had mild RVI (EF > 35%) and 12 (28%) had severe RVI (EF < 35%). Clinical examination had less sensitivity (35%) and high specificity (93%) in the diagnosis of RVI whereas it was highly sensitive (100%) and specific (90%) in detecting severe RVI. Total ST elevation of ≥ 3 mm was highly sensitive (92%), and ≥ 5 mm was highly specific (94%) in detecting severe RVI. RVEF (p < 0.01), RVESVI (p < 0.01), RVEDVI (p < 0.01), RVSVI (p < 0.05), and total ST elevation (p < 0.01) were equally effective in detecting severe RVI. Case fatality rate in RVI was 7%. Proportional mortality rate in females was 67%, with higher mortality in females compared with males (p ≤ 0.05).

Conclusion Right-sided leads should be taken in all cases of acute IWMI. Careful clinical examination, total ST elevation in V1, V2, V3R, V4R, ECHO RVESV, RVEDV, RVSV, RVEF, RVESVI, RVEDVI, and RVSVI are useful in detecting severe RVI. Complications were significantly associated with the severity of RVI. Mortality is high in females compared with males.

Keywords

right ventricular infarction
inferior wall myocardial infarction
electrocardiography
echocardiography

Introduction

Myocardial infarction (MI) was generally regarded as an ischemic injury to the left ventricle. Right ventricle as the site of major damage from acute MI has been recognized clinically only recently.

Right ventricular infarction (RVI) was first described more than 70 years ago in autopsy studies. Between 1949 and 1959 several authors correlated electrocardiographic (ECG) and clinicopathologic findings in patients with MI and concluded that there were no definite ECG signs referable to right ventricular involvement, producing skepticism about the utility of ECG for diagnosis of RVI.1 2 3

In 1974 Cohn et al4 described the syndrome of predominant right ventricular dysfunction during acute inferior wall myocardial infarction (IWMI) and reported that hemodynamics deteriorate markedly and atrioventricular block tends to occur in patients with RVI, with a resulting increase in the hospital death rate. Since then the right ventricle that was the forgotten chamber has drawn much attention, and research was focused on RVI. This landmark study was followed by a renewed interest in the diagnosis of RVI by the use of noninvasive modalities such as ECG, echocardiography (ECHO), nuclear imaging studies, and invasive modalities like right-sided heart catheterization. Among these investigations, earlier investigators focused on the ECG diagnosis of RVI, because the right precordial leads provide the simplest and most objective data in the acute stage of infarction.

The diagnosis of RVI is important because the management of RVI differs from left ventricular infarction. The profound hemodynamic sequelae of RVI may be prevented by the administration of an appropriate intravenous volume load. If RVI is neglected or treated as left-sided heart failure with diuretics, cardiogenic shock may supervene. Nitrates are contraindicated in RVI,5 as RV function is preload dependant.

Depending on the various criteria used, approximately 50% of patients with IWMI have some involvement of the right ventricle,5 because both posterior wall of the right ventricle and the inferior wall of the left ventricle share a common blood supply, that is, usually the right coronary artery.6 7 8 RVI is rare because of lower oxygen demands of the right ventricle, rich intercoronary collateral system, thin right ventricle driving some nutrition from the blood with in right ventricular cavity itself,9 10 11 and systolic compressive forces of the left ventricle producing throttling effect on the left coronaries that drive blood from the left to right coronaries during systole.

Isolated RVI is seen in 3 to 5% of cases with preexisting right ventricular hypertrophy in which oxygen needs of the right ventricle are increased.9 10

Right-sided heart catheterization in every patient presenting with acute IWMI is an impracticable, noninvasive diagnosis. ECG to detect or to raise the suspicion of associated RVI at an early stage would be helpful. In search of reliable noninvasive diagnostic method to assess the severity of RVI, we prospectively evaluated 100 patients with acute IWMI by clinical symptoms/signs, ECG, and ECHO.

Material and Methods

This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted in the coronary care unit of our hospital. One hundred patients with acute IWMI (ST elevation ≥ 1 mm in LII, LIII, and aVF) were taken into the study. Patients with history of previous MI and history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were excluded from the study. Coronary risk factors were assessed. Clinical examination was done.

Clinically RVI was diagnosed if hypotension, elevated jugular venous pressure (JVP), pulsus paradoxus, and RV S3/S4 were present within 48 hours of admission.

ECGs with right precordial leads were taken on admission, and total scoring of ST elevation in right precordial leads (V1, V2, V3R, and V4R) was done (Figs. 1, 2).

Fig. 1 Electrocardiography with right precordial leads on admission.

Fig. 1 Electrocardiography with right precordial leads on admission.

Fig. 2 Electrocardiography with right precordial leads on admission.

Fig. 2 Electrocardiography with right precordial leads on admission.

ECHO was done by using H.P. Sonos 2000 color-coded Doppler. Right ventricular end-systolic volume (RVESV) and right ventricular end-diastolic volume (RVEDV) were measured. RVESV index (RVESVI), RVEDV index (RVEDVI), right ventricular stroke volume (RVSV), RVSV index (RVSVI), and right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) were calculated. RVI patients were divided into two groups basing on RVEF as severe RVI (ejection fraction [EF] < 35%) and mild RVI (EF > 35%) (Figs. 3, 4).

Fig. 3 Short-axis view showing dilated right ventricle.

Fig. 3 Short-axis view showing dilated right ventricle.

Fig. 4 Apical four-chamber views showing dilated right ventricle.

Fig. 4 Apical four-chamber views showing dilated right ventricle.

An attempt to correlate coronary risk factors, clinical symptoms/signs, ECG, and ECHO evidence of right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) was made. Treatment was given according to RVI protocol. Frequency and complications with reference to sex were analyzed.

Statistical Analysis

The data were analyzed by calculating percentage in categories, chi-square test for significance of association, odds ratio (95% confidence interval [CI]) for strength of association, and Student's t-test for comparing mean values of ECG and ECHO.

Results

Among 100 patients of IWMI, 43 (43%) patients had RVI. Mean age of RVI patients was 53.3 ± 10 years (range: 30–77 years), male-to-female ratio was 6:1. We found RVS3/S4 in 12 (28%) patients, pulsus paradoxus in 7 (16%), elevated JVP in 7 (16%), and bradycardia in 5 (12%) patients. Thirty-nine (91%) patients, 3 (7%), and 1 (2%) patient were in Killip class I, II, and III and IV, respectively. Smoking was the major modifiable risk factor and seen in 65% patients. Hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes were found in 47%, 47%, and 21%, respectively. Thirty-one (72%) patients had mild RVI (EF > 35%) and 12 patients (28%) had severe RVI (EF < 35%) (Table 1).

Table 1
RVI severity grading based on RVEF

RVI severity grading

No.

%

Mild RVI

(EF > 35%)

31

72

Severe RVI

(EF < 35%)

12

28

Abbreviations: EF, ejection fraction; RVEF, right ventricular ejection fraction; RVI, right ventricular infarction.

Severe RVI was more common in females, which was statistically significant (p < 0.01) (Table 2), whereas other risk factors did not have significant association with severe RVI (p > 0.05).

Table 2
Association of sex with severity of RVI

Sex

No. of cases of severe RVI

No. of cases of mild RVI

Total

Chi-square test, df, P

OR (95% CI)

Male

7

29

36

7.83

1.00

Female

5

2

7

1

10.35

Total

12

31

43

< 0.01

(1.65–62.8)

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; df, degrees of freedom; OR, odds ratio; P, p value; RVI, right ventricular infarction.

Clinical examination had less sensitivity (35%) and high specificity (93%) in the diagnosis of RVI whereas it was highly sensitive (100%) and specific (90%) in detecting severe RVI (Table 3).

Table 3
Validity of clinical examination in detecting severe RVI

Clinical examination

Sensitivity (TP) (%)

Specificity

(TN) (%)

PPV (%)

NPV (%)

Accuracy (%)

a.

Any one of 4 clinical signs

100

90.3

80

100

93

b.

Hypotension

8.3

93.5

33

73

70

c.

Pulsus paradoxus

58.3

100

100

86

88.4

d.

Elevated JVP

58.3

100

100

86

88.4

e.

RV S3/S4

91.7

96.8

92

97

95.3

Abbreviations: JVP, jugular venous pressure; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value; RV, right ventricle; RVI, right ventricular infarction; TN, true negative; TP, true positive.

Total ST elevation of ≥ 3 mm was highly sensitive (92%), and ≥ 5 mm was highly specific (94%) in detecting severe RVI. ST elevation ≥β2 mm in V3R, V4R were less sensitive (67% and 71% respectively) and less specificity (77% and 84% respectively) in detecting severe RVI (Table 4).

Table 4
Validity of ECG in detecting severe RVI

ECG

Sensitivity (TP) (%)

Specificity (TN) (%)

PPV (%)

NPV (%)

Accuracy (%)

Total ST elevation in V1,V2, V3R, V4R

a.

1.≥ 3 mm

91.7

54.8

44

94

65

2. ≥4 mm

75

77.4

56

89

76.7

3. ≥5 mm

58.3

93.5

78

85

83.7

b.

ST elevation in V3R (≥2 mm)

71.4

77.4

42

77

67.4

c.

ST elevation in V4R (≥2 mm)

66.7

83.9

62

87

70

Abbreviations: ECG, electrocardiogram; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value; RVI, right ventricular infarction; TN, true negative; TP, true positive.

RVEF (p < 0.01), RVESVI (p < 0.01), RVEDVI (p < 0.01), RVSVI (p < 0.05), and total ST elevation (p < 0.01) were equally effective in detecting severe RVI (Table 5).

Table 5
ECHO and ECG findings in RVI patients

ECHO findings

Severe RVI (12)

Mild RVI (31)

p Value

a.

RVESVI

Mean

29.02

9.86

< 0.01

SD

11.25

3.97

b.

RVEDVI

Mean

36.5

19.94

< 0.01

SD

12.18

6.20

c.

RVSVI

Mean

7.3

10.8

< 0.05

SD

4.37

4.68

B.

ECG finding (total ST elevation V1,V2, V3R, V4R in mm)

Mean

5.38

2.82

< 0.01

SD

2.62

1.57

Abbreviations: ECHO, echocardiography; ECG, electrocardiogram; RVI, right ventricular infarction; RVESVI, right ventricular end-systolic velocity index; RVEDVI, right ventricular end-diastolic volume index; RVSVI, right ventricular stroke volume index; SD, standard deviation.

Correlation between total ST elevation and RVEF was computed and correlation coefficient r was −0.52. There was statistically significant negative linear correlation between total ST elevation and RVEF (p < 0.01, t = 2.84, degrees of freedom [df] = 41). Case fatality rate in RVI was 7%. Proportional mortality rate in females was 67%, with higher mortality in females compared with males (p ≤ 0.05) (Table 6).

Table 6
Sex and mortality in RVI

Dead

Alive

Total

Chi-square, df, P

OR (95% CI)

Male

1

35

36

5.91,

1.00

Female

2

5

7

1,

14

Total

3

40

43

< 0.05

(1.06–184.9)

Abbreviations: df, degrees of freedom; OR, odds ratio; P, p value; RVI, right ventricular infarction.

Discussion

The frequency of RVI in IWMI was 43%, which is in accordance with other studies (50%).5

There was no specific symptom pertaining to RVI as compared with IWMI. Smoking was the major risk factor that ranks next to age and sex. When differences in the frequency of IWMI and RVI in relation to coronary risk factors were considered, there was no statistically significant difference. The clinical signs had less sensitivity (35%) and less specificity (68%) in detecting RVI, which is in accordance with other studies12 and in contrast to the study of Shantaram et al according to which clinical signs were present in 80% of cases.13

According to the study conducted by Braat et al,14 sensitivity and specificity of V3R is 69% and 97%, of V4R is 93% and 95%, which were high. Based on this and so many other studies,14 15 16 17 V3R and V4R were taken for diagnosing RVI. In our study, RVI patients were divided into two groups as severe and mild based on ECHO RVEF < 0.35 and > 0.35, respectively. Twelve patients had severe RVI (28%) and 31 had mild RVI (72%).

In the present study, clinical examination showed 100% sensitivity, 90% specificity, and 93% accuracy in detecting severe RVI.

RVI patients were divided into two groups based on the number of risk factors ≥ 5, < 5, and were found to have no relationship to the number of risk factors and severity of RVI (p > 0.05).

In the present study, a cutoff valve was given to total ST elevation in V1, V2, V3R, V4R, and found that total ST elevation of ≥ 3 mm had 92% sensitivity, 55% specificity with 65% accuracy; ≥ 4 mm had 75% sensitivity, 77% specificity with 77% accuracy; and ≥ 5 mm had 58% sensitivity, 94% specificity with 84% accuracy in detecting severe RVI. ST elevation of ≥ 2 mm in V3R had 71% sensitivity, 77% specificity with 67% accuracy, and V4R had 67% sensitivity, 84% specificity, and 70% accuracy in detecting severe RVI. Total ST elevation had high sensitivity and specificity when compared with V3R or V4R alone in detecting severity. Total ST elevation compared with RVEF by using Student's t-test found statistical significant association (p < 0.01), and there was statistically significant negative linear correlation between these two variables (r =  − 0.52, p < 0.01), similar to Hasche et al18 who studied the severity of anterior wall infarction in relation to total ST elevation.

In RVI patients, other ECHO variables such as RVESVI, RVEDVI, and RVSVI were compared for association with RVEF by using Student's t-test, and a statistically significant association among these variables was found (p < 0.01, < 0.01, and < 0.05, respectively). This is in accordance with other studies.15 19 20 21

In the present study, severe RVI was associated with high mortality that is comparable to the study conducted by Mavrić et al.22 In the present study, severe RVI was 10 times more common, and mortality was 14 times higher in females, which is similar to the study conducted by Pell et al.23

Conclusion

Careful clinical examination, total ST elevation in V1, V2, V3R, V4R, ECHO end-systolic, end-diastolic, stroke volumes, and EF of the right ventricle are useful in detecting severe RVI. Complications were significantly associated with the severity of RVI. Mortality is high in females compared with males.

Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. , , , . Correlation of electrocardiographic and pathologic findings in infarction of the interventricular septum and right ventricle. Am Heart J. 1949;37(05):720-770.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . Difficulties in the electrocardiographic diagnosis of myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 1950;39(02):243-262.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , . The pathogenesis of infarction of the right ventricle. Br Heart J. 1959;21(04):545-554.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , . Right ventricular infarction. Clinical and hemodynamic features. Am J Cardiol. 1974;33(02):209-214. ; Clinical and Hemodynamic Features.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . Right ventricular infarction. N Engl J Med. 1994;330(17):1211-1217.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , . Anatomy of the coronary arteries in health and disease. Circulation. 1965;32(06):1020-1033.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , . Angiology Gray's Anatomy. 38th ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; . p. :727-731. . In: , ed.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , . Coronary Arteriography. Braunwald Heart Disease. 5th ed, Volume 1. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders; . p. :247-252. Eugene Braunwald MD. FRCP ed.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , . Isolated right ventricular infarction. Int J Cardiol. 1994;46(01):53-60.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , . Right ventricular infarction. Cardiol Clin. 1992;10(01):69-90.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , . Infarction of the heart II. Clinical course and morphological findings. Ann Intern Med. 1938;12:71-94.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , . Physical examination for exclusion of hemodynamically important right ventricular infarction. Ann Intern Med. 1983;99(05):608-611.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , . Right ventricular infarction. Clinical, ECG and echocardiographic profile. Indian Heart J. 1987;18(01):27-30.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , . Value of electrocardiogram in diagnosing right ventricular involvement in patients with an acute inferior wall myocardial infarction. Br Heart J. 1983;49(04):368-372.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , et al. . ST-segment elevation in right precordial leads implies depressed right ventricular function after acute inferior myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 1998;135(04):689-695.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , . Electrocardiographic diagnosis of right ventricular infarction. Am J Med. 1981;70(06):1175-1180.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , et al. . The early recognition of right ventricular infarction: diagnostic accuracy of the electrocardiographic V4R lead. Circulation. 1983;67(03):558-565.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , . Relation between ischemia time, infarct size, and left ventricular function in humans. Circulation. 1995;92(04):710-719.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , et al. . The noninvasive diagnosis of right ventricular infarction. Circulation. 1978;57(03):483-490.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , et al. . Relations between Doppler tracings of pulmonary regurgitation and invasive hemodynamics in acute right ventricular infarction complicating inferior wall left ventricular infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1995;75(07):425-430.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , , . Right ventricular dysfunction in acute inferoposterior myocardial infarction. An echocardiographic and isotopic study. Chest. 1985;87(03):307-314.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , et al. . Prognostic significance of complete atrioventricular block in patients with acute inferior myocardial infarction with and without right ventricular involvement. Am Heart J. 1990;119(04):823-828.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , . Trends in the incidence of myocardial infarction and in associated mortality and morbidity in a large employed population, 1957–1983. N Engl J Med. 1985;312(16):1005-1011.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections