Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Cardiovascular, Case Report
Cardiovascular, Editorial
Cardiovascular, Images in Cardiology
Cardiovascular, Interventional Round
Cardiovascular, Original Article
Cardiovascular, Preface
Cardiovascular, Review Article
Cardiovascular, Student’s Corner
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical Discussion
Clinical Rounds
CPC
Debate
Dedication
Editorial
Expert Comments
Expert's Opinion
Genetic Autopsy
Genetics Autopsy
Image in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology
Interventional Round
Interventional Rounds
Letter to the Editor
Media and news
Original Article
Practice in Medicine
Preface
Review Article
Scientific Paper
Short Communication
Student's Corner
WINCARS Activities
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Cardiovascular, Case Report
Cardiovascular, Editorial
Cardiovascular, Images in Cardiology
Cardiovascular, Interventional Round
Cardiovascular, Original Article
Cardiovascular, Preface
Cardiovascular, Review Article
Cardiovascular, Student’s Corner
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical Discussion
Clinical Rounds
CPC
Debate
Dedication
Editorial
Expert Comments
Expert's Opinion
Genetic Autopsy
Genetics Autopsy
Image in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology
Interventional Round
Interventional Rounds
Letter to the Editor
Media and news
Original Article
Practice in Medicine
Preface
Review Article
Scientific Paper
Short Communication
Student's Corner
WINCARS Activities
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Editorial
06 (
04
); 248-249
doi:
10.1055/s-0042-1742759

Acute Coronary Syndromes in Women

Director of Cardiology, The Madras Medical Mission, Co-Founder of STEMI-India
Address for correspondence Ajit S. Mullasari. MD, DNB, DM, FRCP Director of Cardiology, The Madras Medical Mission, Co-Founder of STEMI-India Chennai, Tamil Nadu India icvddoctors@mmm.org.in
Licence
This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher; therefore Scientific Scholar has no control over the quality or content of this article.

Gone are the days when a woman's worry over heart attack centered entirely on its threat to the men in her life. We now know it is not just a man's problem. Every year, acute coronary syndrome (ACS), the single biggest cause of death across the world, claims women and men in nearly equal numbers. Because symptoms of ACS in women often differ from those in men, they tend to be ignored.1 Delayed symptom recognition, both by patients and medical professionals, is an important contributor to delay in treatment and subsequent ACS mortality.2 Hence, symptoms of ACS should no longer be labeled as “typical” or “atypical” for women and/or men, rather should be addressed as “women specific symptoms” and both patients and physicians should be educated in early recognition of these symptoms. Historically, women with ACS have had worse outcomes compared with men due to misdiagnosis, late presentation, lower rates of thrombolytic therapy, and cardiac catheterization.3 With advances in availability and delivery of revascularization therapies, outcomes seem to have improved between genders in most of the western world.3 However, this data cannot be generalized, as the recently published subgroup analysis from the landmark Tamil Nadu-STEMI program showed that women in India are twice as likely to die from a heart attack compared to men.4 This pattern of risk also continued even among women less than 45 years of age and persisted up to a year after heart attack. Particularly, the incidence of nonobstructive disease and nonatherosclerotic ACS is higher in women and is associated with greater adverse events including recurrent angina, hospitalization, and death.5

Diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, unhealthy diet, and lack of physical exercise are all traditional risk factors for ACS that are on the rise in women. But more interestingly, recent research shows that the nontraditional risk factors such as depression, anxiety, stress at home, and low social support are much higher in women than in men.6 And because of this the incidence of ACS in younger women is on the rise and heart attacks occurring in premenopausal women, once a rare occurrence, are more common today. In addition, women with ACS are less likely to receive guideline-recommended therapies and sex-related differences in presentation, higher prevalence of comorbidities, and uncertainties in the management of unusual causes of ACS that disproportionally affect women may contribute to these disparities.

There is a lack of robust study data on ACS in women. Women continue to be under represented in the majority of clinical trials, resulting in knowledge gaps and uncertainty about the safety and efficacy of many lifesaving therapies. The interesting study done by Dr. Suma Victor and team in the current issue is a step forward in the right direction toward women-specific research in ACS. This study sets the foundation for future studies in developing countries that aim to characterize patient factors that drive the sex gap in mortality and to propose new approaches for tailoring care to the needs of women. More adequately powered, randomized controlled studies are needed to better understand the optimal use of currently available treatments in clinical practice, to optimize management of ACS in women.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. , , , et al , . Sex-related differences in the presentation, treatment and outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes: the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Heart. 2009;95(01):20-26.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , . Factors related to delay times in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. Heart Lung. 2004;33(05):291-300.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , et al . Sex differences in mortality following acute coronary syndromes. JAMA. 2009;302(08):874-882.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , . Sex-related differences in outcomes for patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI): a Tamil Nadu-STEMI program subgroup analysis. Heart Lung Circ. 2021;30(12):1870-1875.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . What causes myocardial infarction in women without obstructive coronary artery disease? Circulation. 2011;124(13):1404-1406.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , et al . Editor's choice-sex differences in young patients with acute myocardial infarction: a VIRGO study analysis. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2017;6(07):610-622.
    [Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
74

PDF downloads
2
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections