Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstracts
Cardiovascular, Case Report
Cardiovascular, Commentary
Cardiovascular, Editorial
Cardiovascular, Guest Editorial
Cardiovascular, Images in Cardiology
Cardiovascular, Interventional Round
Cardiovascular, Original Article
Cardiovascular, Perspective Review
Cardiovascular, Preface
Cardiovascular, Review Article
Cardiovascular, Student’s Corner
Case Report
Case Report, Cardiovascular
Case Reports
Case Series, Cardiovascular
Clinical Discussion
Clinical Rounds
CPC
Current Issue
Debate
Dedication
Editorial
Editorial Cardiovascular
Editorial Comment, Cardiovascular
Editorial, From the Publisher’s Desk
Expert Comments
Expert's Opinion
Genetic Autopsy
Genetics Autopsy
Guest Editorial, Cardiovascular
Image in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology, Cardiovascular
Interventional Round
Interventional Round, Cardiovascular
Interventional Rounds
Invited Editorial Cardiovascular
Letter to Editor
Letter to Editor, Clinical Cardiology
Letter to the Editor
Media and news
Original Article
Original Article, ardiovascular
Original Article, Cardiovascular
Original Article, Cardiovascular Health
Perspective Review
Perspective Review, Cardiovascular
Point of View, Cardiovascular
Practice in Medicine
Preface
Review Article
Review Article, Cardiovascular
Scientific Paper
Short Communication
Student's Corner
Supplementary
Supplemetary
WINCARS Activities
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstracts
Cardiovascular, Case Report
Cardiovascular, Commentary
Cardiovascular, Editorial
Cardiovascular, Guest Editorial
Cardiovascular, Images in Cardiology
Cardiovascular, Interventional Round
Cardiovascular, Original Article
Cardiovascular, Perspective Review
Cardiovascular, Preface
Cardiovascular, Review Article
Cardiovascular, Student’s Corner
Case Report
Case Report, Cardiovascular
Case Reports
Case Series, Cardiovascular
Clinical Discussion
Clinical Rounds
CPC
Current Issue
Debate
Dedication
Editorial
Editorial Cardiovascular
Editorial Comment, Cardiovascular
Editorial, From the Publisher’s Desk
Expert Comments
Expert's Opinion
Genetic Autopsy
Genetics Autopsy
Guest Editorial, Cardiovascular
Image in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology, Cardiovascular
Interventional Round
Interventional Round, Cardiovascular
Interventional Rounds
Invited Editorial Cardiovascular
Letter to Editor
Letter to Editor, Clinical Cardiology
Letter to the Editor
Media and news
Original Article
Original Article, ardiovascular
Original Article, Cardiovascular
Original Article, Cardiovascular Health
Perspective Review
Perspective Review, Cardiovascular
Point of View, Cardiovascular
Practice in Medicine
Preface
Review Article
Review Article, Cardiovascular
Scientific Paper
Short Communication
Student's Corner
Supplementary
Supplemetary
WINCARS Activities
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstracts
Cardiovascular, Case Report
Cardiovascular, Commentary
Cardiovascular, Editorial
Cardiovascular, Guest Editorial
Cardiovascular, Images in Cardiology
Cardiovascular, Interventional Round
Cardiovascular, Original Article
Cardiovascular, Perspective Review
Cardiovascular, Preface
Cardiovascular, Review Article
Cardiovascular, Student’s Corner
Case Report
Case Report, Cardiovascular
Case Reports
Case Series, Cardiovascular
Clinical Discussion
Clinical Rounds
CPC
Current Issue
Debate
Dedication
Editorial
Editorial Cardiovascular
Editorial Comment, Cardiovascular
Editorial, From the Publisher’s Desk
Expert Comments
Expert's Opinion
Genetic Autopsy
Genetics Autopsy
Guest Editorial, Cardiovascular
Image in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology, Cardiovascular
Interventional Round
Interventional Round, Cardiovascular
Interventional Rounds
Invited Editorial Cardiovascular
Letter to Editor
Letter to Editor, Clinical Cardiology
Letter to the Editor
Media and news
Original Article
Original Article, ardiovascular
Original Article, Cardiovascular
Original Article, Cardiovascular Health
Perspective Review
Perspective Review, Cardiovascular
Point of View, Cardiovascular
Practice in Medicine
Preface
Review Article
Review Article, Cardiovascular
Scientific Paper
Short Communication
Student's Corner
Supplementary
Supplemetary
WINCARS Activities
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Review Article
Cardiovascular
10 (
4
); 287-293
doi:
10.25259/IJCDW_73_2025

Lipoprotein(a), Remnant Cholesterol and Non-HDL-C in Women - Is it Different

Department of Cardiology, Kims Hospital, Ongole, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Department of Cardiology, AIG Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Department of Endocrinology, Kims Hospital, Ongole, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Department of Cardiology, Apollo DRDO Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Department of Cardiology, Apollo Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

*Corresponding author: Harish Oruganti, Department of Cardiology, Kims Hospital, Ongole, Andhra Pradesh, India. harishcardiologynims@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Oruganti H, Sridevi C, Geeta Priyadarsini A, Sai Kumar S, Deb T. Lipoprotein(a), Remnant Cholesterol and Non-HDL-C in Women - Is it Different. Indian J Cardiovasc Dis Women. 2025;10:287-93. doi: 10.25259/IJCDW_73_2025

Abstract

Dyslipidemia is a known risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) diseases. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol is considered the primary target in dyslipidemia management. Recently, interest has grown in the roles of lipoprotein(a), remnant cholesterol, and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol as alternative, reliable goals. These markers are advantageous as they are easily estimated, do not require fasting, and provide dependable parameters for predicting atherosclerotic CV disease risk. Evolving data on these parameters in Indian women may help assess CV risk in this population.

Keywords

Women
dyslipidemia
cholesterol
low-density lipoprotein remnant cholesterol lipoprotein(a) non-high-density lipoprotein

INTRODUCTION

Conventionally, assessment of lipids included measurement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), very LDL (VLDL)-C and total cholesterol (TC).[1] Recently, there has been a growing interest in residual risk of atherogenic diseases in statin-treated patients.[2] Though there may be various reasons for recurrent cardiovascular (CV) events in these statin-treated patients significant atherogenic potential of lipids other than LDL-C, which include lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]), remnant cholesterol, and non-HDL, is of growing interest.[3] LDL-C, a predominant lipoprotein carrying cholesterol, is a well-established risk factor for atherosclerotic CV disease (ASCVD) and therefore a prime target for lipid-lowering treatment according to various guidelines.[3,4] Residual atherogenic risk in patients who have achieved target LDL-C on treatment is an important and clinically relevant issue.[5] Few studies have implicated a stronger association of non-HDL-C, apo-B with residual CV risk.[6] Various lipid guidelines and consensus statements have already endorsed non-HDL, Apo-B as predominant and secondary targets.[5,7-10] Indian-specific data on dyslipidemia are scarce and continue to evolve. This review article is a step forward in providing a consensus statement on dyslipidemia and offers research recommendations to enhance health equity among Indian women.

This article discusses the importance of lipoprotein (a), remnant cholesterol, and non-HDL cholesterol in the assessment of dyslipidemia, studies their role in women across their lifetime in various pathological conditions, examines the current evidence and guidelines, comments on their importance, and highlights the clinical value of these parameters. It also provides practical consensus advice and research recommendations on screening, threshold values, and therapies to mitigate CV risk.

WHAT IS “LP(A), REMNANT CHOLESTEROL AND NON-HDL-C”?

Lipoprotein a is structurally LDL-C with Apo a attached to it. It is proatherogenic, prothrombotic, proinflammatory, and an independent risk factor for ASCVD, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, valvular aortic stenosis, carotid and femoral artery disease, and all-cause mortality.[11] It is genetically determined, reaches peak level by 5 years of age, and therefore lifestyle changes have minimal impact on it.[12] Due to its high CV disease risk, various guidelines suggest Lp(a) level testing at least once in a lifetime.[13,14] Cascade testing of family members is advised for probands with familial hypercholesterolemia and high Lp(a).[15] Table 1[16-21] lists few studies on Lp(a) in women. Studies in the Indian scenario are listed in Table 2.[22-25]

Table 1: Key cohort and registry studies on Lp(a) in women.
Author (year) Cohort/design Women-specific findings Take-home message
Nissen et al. (2022)[16] 48,135 enrolled patients, 25.9% were female Lp(a) HERITAGE study Lp(a) levels in women were higher than levels in men. Women also had higher LDLC levels Lp(a) and LDLC were higher in women and highlighting the importance of these as riskenhancing factors in women
Di Angelantonio et al. (2009)[17] 3 women’s cohorts (WHI, WHS, JUPITER) High Lp(a) predicted risk only when total cholesterol >220 mg/dL Screening utility selective; not routine for all women
Honigberg et al. (2022)[18] Mass General Brigham registry (90,000 postmenopausal women in midlife) Elevated Lp(a) ↑ CHD risk HT use associated with modest reduction in Lp(a) Supports Lp(a) testing HT is not recommended for ASCVD risk reduction. It may be a reasonable treatment option for vasomotor symptoms
Raja et al. (2023)[19] 2,110 angiography pts, 33month followup Lp(a) >30 mg/dL adverse only in diabetic women e interaction of sex and metabolic status important
Corral et al. (2024)[20] Narrative review on women’s life stages on Lp(a) and its clinical relevance Menarche, pregnancy, and menopause all alter Lp(a) Advocates at least onceinalifetime testing, esp. in women
Madsen et al. (2020)[21] From Copenhagen general population study 2,527 patients with CVD (includes 900 women) High Lp(a) levels are associated with recurrentCVD both in men and women Lp(a) lowering by 50 mg/dL in short term (5 years) may reduce CVD by 20%.

Lp(a): Lipoprotein(a), LDLC: Lowdensity lipoprotein cholesterol, CHD: Coronary heart disease, ASCVD: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, HT: Hypertension, CVD: Cardiovascular disease

Table 2: Indian studies on Lp(a) and CAD.
Author (year) Cohort/design Women-specific findings Take-home message
Pare et al. (2019)[22] INTERHEART study – case–control among seven ethnic groups Higher Lp(a) was associated with increased MI risk with high PAR in South Asians and Latin Americans Supports current clinicalthreshold of 50 mg/dL
Rajasekhar et al. (2004)[23] Case–control, South Indians Lp(a) >25 mg/dL → ↑ CHD; stronger associations in women Suggested lower cutoffs for South Indians
Joseph et al. (2022)[24] Kerala multicenter Higher Lp(a) linked to CAD severity; strongest in women and younger pts Confirms role in South Indians
Mahajan et al. (2025)[25] 688 ACS pts, North India Elevated Lp(a) independently predicted complex CAD anatomy Diagnostic utility for ACS triage

Remnant cholesterol=total cholesterol Lowdensity lipoprotein cholesterol highdensity lipoprotein cholesterol. Lp(a): Lipoprotein(a), CAD: Coronary artery disease, CHD: Coronary heart disease, ACS: Acute coronary syndrome, MI: Myocardial infarction, PAR: Population attributable risk

For triglyceride levels >4.5 mmol/L (400 mg/dL), a direct LDL cholesterol assay is required to estimate remnant cholesterol. Remnant cholesterol is the cholesterol in all triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, not found in LDL or HDL.[26] It describes the TC content of all triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRL) remnants, which include chylomicrons, VLDL.[27] It has been independently linked to adverse CV events independent of.[28] It can be calculated from a standard non-fasting lipid profile at no extra cost.[29,30] In simple terms, it is the total plasma cholesterol except that found in LDL-C and HDL-C. It is also linked to accelerated progression of atherogenesis and coronary heart disease.[31-33]

Non-HDL cholesterol is calculated by subtracting HDL cholesterol from TC. This value represents the sum of LDL and remnant cholesterol.[27] It includes all the atherogenic lipoproteins.[34] It denotes the TC of all Apo B lipoproteins. It includes remnant cholesterol plus all cholesterol in Apo B-containing lipoproteins.[35] Recent guidelines highlight its importance for predicting CV disease risk. It is valuable for screening because its measurement is simple, can be done in non-fasting state and is a valuable prognostic marker.[19]

It has an advantage over LDL because it is not affected by triglyceride variability, which is an important risk factor in Indians.[36]

UNDERSTANDING THE UNIQUE ASPECTS OF LIPID PROFILE IN WOMEN

There are differences in the distribution and levels of lipids from infancy to adulthood between men and women. In the initial life course, girls tend to have high LDL and TC with similar HDL levels compared to boys. Lipid levels also vary during the menstrual cycle, with higher TC and LDL during the follicular phase and a decline during the luteal phase.[37]

During pregnancy, a physiological increase in LDL and a much higher increase in TG levels have been observed. In the early adulthood to middle age, women have low LDL and high HDL. During perimenopause and post-menopause, women tend to have an adverse lipid profile. These findings emphasize the need for interpretation of lipid profiles based on gender and life course of women.[37]

The association between remnant cholesterol and metabolic syndrome risk appears to be stronger in women compared to men. This may be due to a relative deficiency of estrogen, particularly after menopause, which affects lipid metabolism and increases risk. After menopause, women usually develop a lipid profile with higher LDL-C, triglycerides, and TC, driving up remnant cholesterol and non-HDL-C. Both remnant cholesterol and non-HDL-C levels tend to rise with age in women, and postmenopausal women face higher correlated risks for CV disease and diabetes than premenopausal women.

In addition, in coronary artery disease, a difference in lipid profile pattern has been observed. A south Indian cross-sectional study done in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients showed that males have higher mean TC and LDL-C, whereas females had higher mean triglycerides and HDL-C.[38]

The causal link between dyslipidemia and CV disease has been well established. High levels of LDL-C have been strongly implicated as a risk factor. However, these findings have largely been derived from studies involving the Caucasian population. Keeping in view the diversity of the human population, genetically, nutritionally, these findings may not be universally.[39] Asians are the largest population with CV disease worldwide. Almost 25% of acute myocardial infarction patients in Asia have LDL ≤100 mg/dL. Despite lower absolute LDL-C levels, the pattern of higher risk with elevated levels was seen among various groups. They have a distinct lipid profile comprising high TG, low LDL, and low HDL.

High Apo B to Apo a1 ratio has the strongest association with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) among all the lipid parameters.[40]

DOES LIPID PROFILE CHANGE IN A WOMAN THROUGHOUT THEIR LIFE?

Hormonal status varies in women throughout the life time and these have an effect on lipid metabolism. Endogenous estrogen is known to have a beneficial effect on lipoprotein metabolism and progesterone has a neutral.[41] During a menstrual cycle, higher lipid levels are observed during ovulation.[41] Increase in TC, LDL in the immediate preovulatory period, and peaking of HDL at ovulation have a physiological role as these lipoproteins help in steroidogenesis, should pregnancy occur. TC and LDL levels are low during the luteal phase when estrogen and progesterone are highest. HDL is highest during ovulation, coinciding with high estrogen levels. No consistent pattern is noted in triglyceride levels. At menarche Lp(a) levels are not significantly affected by hormonal changes except by supraphysiological progesterone levels. Therefore, fertility therapies with follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) induce luteal progesterone increase, which increases Lp(a) level. Despite this, no significant increase in CV disease is observed in a registry-based cohort study in Denmark on long-term follow-up for almost 11 years in women who gave birth by assisted reproductive techniques.[42]

Furthermore, in coronary artery disease, a difference in lipid profile pattern has been observed. A South Indian cross-sectional study done in ACS patients showed that males have higher mean TC and LDL-C, whereas females had higher mean triglycerides and HDL-C.[1]

PATHOGENESIS OF ATHEROSCLEROSIS AND LIPID HOMEOSTASIS IN WOMEN

Estrogens decrease atherosclerotic plaque volume, increase endothelial nitric oxide production, leading to vasodilation.[43] Estrogens reduce E-selectin, vascular and intercellular adhesion molecules in endothelial cells, prevent smooth muscle cell proliferation, and extracellular matrix deposition, thereby decreasing.[44]

Imaging studies have shown that women compared to men have fewer atherosclerotic plaques, smaller necrotic core, less calcification, less intraplaque hemorrhage, and plaque rupture.[45]

Estrogens decrease LDL-C, increase HDL-C and favorably impact reverse cholesterol transport.[46]

SCENARIOS SPECIFIC TO WOMEN

Polycystic ovarian syndrome

It is the most common endocrine disorder in women of reproductive age. It shares many features with metabolic syndrome, such as obesity, hypertension, insulin resistance, and hyperandrogenism. High levels of triglycerides, TC, LDL, VLDL, and intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL) are observed.[47] These patients predominantly have type 3 and 4 LDL, which are small and considered to have more CV risk.[48]

Oral contraceptive (OC) pills

Significant influence of OC use on TC, LDL-C, and triglycerides has been observed. These changes were independent of diet, physical activity, and socioeconomic status. Several studies have shown that OC use increases triglyceride levels.[49] The effect of OC on LDL-C varies, as some studies report an increase, while others demonstrate a neutral or an LDL-C-lowering effect.[50] Higher HDL-C levels in OC users depend on the estrogen content and progestin generation. High HDL-C was seen in girls using preparations with high estrogen content and third and fourth generation progestins compared to those on second-generation progestins.[51] Data on the long-term effects of OC on lipids are inconsistent.[52]

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT)

HRT causes a significant decrease in Lp(a), ApoB, LDL-C, non-HDL, TC/HDL-C, and LDL-C/HDL-C, with almost negligible effect on HDL-C.[53] Oral estrogen replacement therapy makes the lipid profile favorable. Lp(a) is significantly reduced by HRT and tibolone in post-menopausal women.[54]

However, HRT cannot be considered as a therapeutic option for reducing Lp(a).[55]

Underscreening and underrepresentation

Women with dyslipidemia are often under-screened and undertreated. Almost 8 out of 10 women of childbearing age are never evaluated for lipid.[56] The numbers may be much worrisome in developing nations like India. Women with elevated LDL and normal to high HDL-c experience therapeutic inertia.[57] Normal or high HDL should not prevent a physician from treating high LDL. Constant efforts by lipid associations should be made to include women in various studies to abrogate the gender biased data which are the need of the hour.

CONCLUSION

Residual CV risk persists even among individuals who achieve target LDL-C levels. Non-HDL cholesterol, encompassing LDL and remnant cholesterol, is increasingly recognized as a key contributor to this residual risk and should be considered a co-primary treatment target. As a prognostic marker, non-HDL cholesterol offers practical advantages: It is stable, cost-effective, and can be measured without fasting. Current guidelines recommend that nonHDL cholesterol levels should not exceed 30 mg/dL above the desired LDL-C target.

Recent insights highlight the atherogenic potential of triglycerides, triglyceride-rich remnants, and remnant cholesterol, which may further contribute to CV risk. In addition, elevated Lp(a) – a genetically determined factor – places individuals at high risk, warranting at least one lifetime screening and cascade testing in families with familial hypercholesterolemia.

Given India’s high burden of coronary artery disease (CAD), there is a pressing need for representative national studies, including adequate female participation. Efforts should focus on increasing awareness of dyslipidemia, routine lipid screening, and proactive identification and management of high-risk individuals to reduce CV morbidity and mortality.

In summary, both non-HDL-C and remnant cholesterol are important markers for CV and metabolic risk in women, with some evidence that remnant cholesterol may have particularly strong associations with metabolic syndrome and diabetes risk in postmenopausal women. The levels and impact of these markers do differ by sex, with hormonal changes playing a significant role.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent

Patient’s consent not required as there are no patients in this study.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. . Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation. 2002;106(25):3143-421.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . The Remnants of Residual Risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65:2276-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , et al. Association of LDL Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, and Apolipoprotein B Levels with Risk of Cardiovascular Events among Patients Treated with Statins: A Meta-Analysis. JAMA. 2012;307:1302-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , et al. Lipid Measurements in the Management of Cardiovascular Diseases: Practical Recommendations a Scientific Statement from the National Lipid Association Writing Group. J Clin Lipidol. 2021;15:629-48.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , et al. Beyond Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol: Defining the Role of Low-Density Lipoprotein Heterogeneity in Coronary Artery Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:1735-41.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , et al. Association of LDL Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, and Apolipoprotein B Levels with Risk of Cardiovascular Events among Patients Treated with Statins: A Meta-Analysis. JAMA. 2012;307:1302-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:3168-209.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , et al. 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias: Lipid Modification to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:111-88.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , et al. Quantifying Atherogenic Lipoproteins for Lipid-Lowering Strategies: Consensus-based Recommendations from EAS and EFLM. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020;58:496-517.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , et al. Participation of Women and Older Participants in Randomized Clinical Trials of Lipid-Lowering Therapies: A Systematic Review. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3:e205202.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , . Lipoprotein(a) in Clinical Practice: New Perspectives from Basic and Translational Science. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2018;55:33-54.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. . Lipoprotein a-Lp(a) Indian Heart J. 2024;76:S117-20.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , et al. Lipoprotein(a) in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease and Aortic Stenosis: A European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Statement. Eur Heart J. 2022;43:3925-46.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , et al. Navigating Cardiovascular Risk and Lipid Management in Indian Patients: Key Messages from the Lipid Association of India 2024 Consensus Statement IV. J Assoc Physicians India. 2024;72:80-2.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , et al. Cascade Testing for Elevated Lipoprotein(a) in Relatives of Probands with Familial Hypercholesterolaemia and Elevated Lipoprotein(a) Atherosclerosis. 2022;349:219-26.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , et al. Lipoprotein(a) Levels in a Global Population with Established Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease. Open Heart. 2022;9:e002060.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , et al. Major Lipids, Apolipoproteins, and Risk of Vascular Disease. JAMA. 2009;302:1993-2000.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , . Lipoprotein(a), Menopausal Hormone Therapy, and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease in Postmenopausal Individuals. JAMA Cardiol. 2022;7:565-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , , et al. Non-HDL-Cholesterol in Dyslipidemia: Review of the State-of-the-Art Literature and Outlook. Atherosclerosis. 2023;383:117312.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , , et al. Lipoprotein(a) throughout Life in Women. Am J Prev Cardiol. 2024;20:100885.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , . Lipoprotein(a)-Lowering by 50 mg/dL (105 nmol/L) May Be Needed to Reduce Cardiovascular Disease 20% in Secondary Prevention. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2020;40:255-66.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , , et al. Lipoprotein(a) Levels and the Risk of Myocardial Infarction among 7 Ethnic Groups. Circulation. 2019;139:1472-82.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , . Lipoprotein (A): Better Assessor of Coronary Heart Disease Risk in South Indian Population. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2004;19:53-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , , . Association of Lipoprotein (a) with Coronary Artery Disease in a South Asian Population: A Case-Control Study. PLoS One. 2022;17:e0267807.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , , , et al. Lipoprotein(a) as an Independent Biomarker of Coronary Complexity: Prevalence, Clinical Correlates, and Diagnostic Utility in a North Indian Acute Coronary Syndrome Cohort. Cureus. 2025;17:e90747.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. . Triglyceride-Rich Lipoproteins and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: New Insights from Epidemiology, Genetics, and Biology. Circ Res. 2016;118:547-63.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. , , . What is 'Remnant Cholesterol'? Eur Heart J. 2023;44:1446-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , , , , et al. Remnant Cholesterol Predicts Cardiovascular Disease beyond LDL and ApoB: A Primary Prevention Study. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:4324-32.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. , , , , . Nonfasting Triglycerides and Risk of Cardiovascular Death in Men and Women from the Norwegian Counties Study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25:789-98.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. , , , . Nonfasting Triglycerides and Risk of Myocardial Infarction, Ischemic Heart Disease, and Death in Men and Women. JAMA. 2007;298:299-308.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. , , , , , , et al. Triglyceride-Rich Lipoproteins and High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Patients at High Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: Evidence and Guidance for Management. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:1345-61.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. , , , . The Role of Triglyceride-Rich Lipoprotein Families in the Progression of Atherosclerotic Lesions as Determined by Sequential Coronary Angiography from a Controlled Clinical Trial. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:715-22.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. , , , , , . Atherosclerosis: A Comprehensive Review of Molecular Factors and Mechanisms. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26:1364.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. , , , , , , et al. Low-Density Lipoproteins Cause Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: Pathophysiological, Genetic, and Therapeutic Insights: A Consensus Statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:2313-30.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. , , . Non-Hgh-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol: Current Status as Cardiovascular Marker. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2015;26:502-10.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. , , , . Non-HDLCholesterol and Apolipoprotein B Compared with LDLCholesterol in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment. Pathology. 2019;51:148-54.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. , . Sex Differences in Lipids: A Life Course Approach. Atherosclerosis. 2023;384:117270.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. , , . Gender Difference of Lipid Profile in a South Indian Population with Acute Coronary Syndrome-A Cross Sectional Study. J Med Sci Clin Res. 2018;6:32343-7.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. , , . A Study of Lipid Levels in Indian Patients with Coronary Arterial Disease. Int J Cardiol. 1989;24:337-45.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. , , , , , , et al. Lipid Profile, Plasma Apolipoproteins, and Risk of a First Myocardial Infarction among Asians: An Analysis from the INTERHEART Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:244-53.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. , , , . Variations in Lipid Levels According to Menstrual Cycle Phase: Clinical Implications. Clin Lipidol. 2011;6:225-34.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. , , , , , , et al. Maternal Risk of Cardiovascular Disease after Use of Assisted Reproductive Technologies. JAMA Cardiol. 2023;8:837-45.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. , , , , . Estrogens Inhibit Angiotensin II-Induced LeukocyteEndothelial Cell Interactions in Vivo via Rapid Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase and Cyclooxygenase Activation. Circ Res. 2002;91:1142-50.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. , , , . Estradiol-Mediated Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase Association with Heat Shock Protein 90 Requires Adenosine Monophosphate-Dependent Protein Kinase. Circulation. 2005;111:3473-80.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. , , , , , , et al. Gender-Associated Differences in Plaque Phenotype of Patients Undergoing Carotid Endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg. 2007;45:289-96. discussion 296-7
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. , , , , , , et al. Clinically used Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators Affect Different Steps of Macrophage-Specific Reverse Cholesterol Transport. Sci Rep. 2016;6:32105.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. , , , , . Atherogenic Lipoprotein Phenotype and Low-Density Lipoproteins Size and Subclasses in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:186-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. . Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) Final Report. Circulation. 2002;106:3143-421.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. , , , . ERICA: Cardiovascular Risks Associated with Oral Contraceptive Use among Brazilian Adolescents. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2022;98:53-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. , , , , , , et al. Effects of a Combined Oral Contraceptive Containing 20 mcg of Ethinylestradiol and 3 mg of Drospirenone on the Blood Pressure, Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, Insulin Resistance, and Androgenic Profile of Healthy Young Women. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2015;31:912-5.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. , , , , , . Hormonal Contraceptive Use among Adolescent Girls in Germany in Relation to Health Behavior and Biological Cardiovascular Risk Factors. J Adolesc Health. 2011;48:331-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. , , , , , , et al. Influence of Oral Contraceptives on Lipid Profile and Trajectories in Healthy Adolescents-Data From the EVA-Tyrol Study. J Adolesc Health. 2024;75:479-86.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. , , , , , . Randomized Trial of Effects of Estradiol in Combination with Either Norethisterone Acetate or Trimegestone on Lipids and Lipoproteins in Postmenopausal Women. Climacteric. 2004;7:292-300.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. , , , , , , et al. The Effect of Hormone Replacement Therapy and Tibolone on Lipoprotein (a) Concentrations in Postmenopausal Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Maturitas. 2017;99:27-36.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. , , , , , . Relationship between Lipoprotein(a) Levels and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Postmenopausal Women: A Systematic Review. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2023;48:101589.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. , , , , , . Screening for Hyperlipidemia in Pregnant Women: An Underutilized Opportunity for Early Risk Assessment. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:14.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. , , , , . Therapeutic Inertia in the Outpatient Management of Dyslipidemia in Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease. The Inertia Study. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2010;63:1428-37.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections