Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstracts
Cardiovascular, Case Report
Cardiovascular, Commentary
Cardiovascular, Editorial
Cardiovascular, Guest Editorial
Cardiovascular, Images in Cardiology
Cardiovascular, Interventional Round
Cardiovascular, Original Article
Cardiovascular, Perspective Review
Cardiovascular, Preface
Cardiovascular, Review Article
Cardiovascular, Student’s Corner
Case Report
Case Report, Cardiovascular
Case Reports
Case Series, Cardiovascular
Clinical Discussion
Clinical Rounds
CPC
Current Issue
Debate
Dedication
Editorial
Editorial Cardiovascular
Editorial Comment, Cardiovascular
Editorial, From the Publisher’s Desk
Expert Comments
Expert's Opinion
Genetic Autopsy
Genetics Autopsy
Guest Editorial, Cardiovascular
Image in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology, Cardiovascular
Interventional Round
Interventional Round, Cardiovascular
Interventional Rounds
Invited Editorial Cardiovascular
Letter to Editor
Letter to Editor, Clinical Cardiology
Letter to the Editor
Media and news
Original Article
Original Article, ardiovascular
Original Article, Cardiovascular
Original Article, Cardiovascular Health
Perspective Review
Perspective Review, Cardiovascular
Point of View, Cardiovascular
Practice in Medicine
Preface
Review Article
Review Article, Cardiovascular
Scientific Paper
Short Communication
Student's Corner
Supplementary
Supplemetary
WINCARS Activities
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstracts
Cardiovascular, Case Report
Cardiovascular, Commentary
Cardiovascular, Editorial
Cardiovascular, Guest Editorial
Cardiovascular, Images in Cardiology
Cardiovascular, Interventional Round
Cardiovascular, Original Article
Cardiovascular, Perspective Review
Cardiovascular, Preface
Cardiovascular, Review Article
Cardiovascular, Student’s Corner
Case Report
Case Report, Cardiovascular
Case Reports
Case Series, Cardiovascular
Clinical Discussion
Clinical Rounds
CPC
Current Issue
Debate
Dedication
Editorial
Editorial Cardiovascular
Editorial Comment, Cardiovascular
Editorial, From the Publisher’s Desk
Expert Comments
Expert's Opinion
Genetic Autopsy
Genetics Autopsy
Guest Editorial, Cardiovascular
Image in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology, Cardiovascular
Interventional Round
Interventional Round, Cardiovascular
Interventional Rounds
Invited Editorial Cardiovascular
Letter to Editor
Letter to Editor, Clinical Cardiology
Letter to the Editor
Media and news
Original Article
Original Article, ardiovascular
Original Article, Cardiovascular
Original Article, Cardiovascular Health
Perspective Review
Perspective Review, Cardiovascular
Point of View, Cardiovascular
Practice in Medicine
Preface
Review Article
Review Article, Cardiovascular
Scientific Paper
Short Communication
Student's Corner
Supplementary
Supplemetary
WINCARS Activities
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstracts
Cardiovascular, Case Report
Cardiovascular, Commentary
Cardiovascular, Editorial
Cardiovascular, Guest Editorial
Cardiovascular, Images in Cardiology
Cardiovascular, Interventional Round
Cardiovascular, Original Article
Cardiovascular, Perspective Review
Cardiovascular, Preface
Cardiovascular, Review Article
Cardiovascular, Student’s Corner
Case Report
Case Report, Cardiovascular
Case Reports
Case Series, Cardiovascular
Clinical Discussion
Clinical Rounds
CPC
Current Issue
Debate
Dedication
Editorial
Editorial Cardiovascular
Editorial Comment, Cardiovascular
Editorial, From the Publisher’s Desk
Expert Comments
Expert's Opinion
Genetic Autopsy
Genetics Autopsy
Guest Editorial, Cardiovascular
Image in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology, Cardiovascular
Interventional Round
Interventional Round, Cardiovascular
Interventional Rounds
Invited Editorial Cardiovascular
Letter to Editor
Letter to Editor, Clinical Cardiology
Letter to the Editor
Media and news
Original Article
Original Article, ardiovascular
Original Article, Cardiovascular
Original Article, Cardiovascular Health
Perspective Review
Perspective Review, Cardiovascular
Point of View, Cardiovascular
Practice in Medicine
Preface
Review Article
Review Article, Cardiovascular
Scientific Paper
Short Communication
Student's Corner
Supplementary
Supplemetary
WINCARS Activities
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Review Article
Cardiovascular
10 (
4
); 312-324
doi:
10.25259/IJCDW_55_2025

Inclisiran and siRNA-Based Lipid Lowering: A New Frontier Including ANGPTL3 Inhibitors and Apo C III Inhibitors

Department of Cardiology, Apollo Spectra Hospital, Ameerpet, Telangana, India,
Department of Cardiology, Apollo Hospitals, Hyderabad, Telangana, India,
Department of Cardiology, Portneuf Medical Center, Pocatello, United States,
Department of Cardiology, Durgabai Deshmukh Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

*Corresponding author: Dr.Ramya Pechetty, Department of Cardiology, Apollo Spectra Hospital, Ameerpet, Hyderabad. ramyapechetty@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Pechetty R, Rao PS, Deb T, Shekar C, Deepthi K. Inclisiran and siRNA-Based Lipid Lowering: A New Frontier Including ANGPTL3 Inhibitors and Apo C III Inhibitors. Indian J Cardiovasc Dis Women. 2025;10:312-24. doi: 10.25259/IJCDW_55_2025

Abstract

Cardiovascular (CV) disease remains the leading cause of death worldwide. Dyslipidemia is a well-known risk factor for CV disease. The persistent rise in heart disease despite widespread use of statins highlights the limitations of current cholesterol management strategies. While statins are effective, underutilization and intolerance leave significant treatment gaps, especially in women. Women tend to develop greater side effects to statins and are also prone to genetic polymorphisms which make them statin under-responsive. Beyond low-density lipoprotein, other lipoprotein targets have been investigated such as triglycerides and lipoprotein(a) that may contribute to the patient’s residual CV risk. Fortunately, new drug classes targeting these varied lipid pathways have shown promise in lowering cholesterol levels and reducing the CV event rates. This review will discuss the mode of action, effectiveness, and recommendations of three new classes of drugs – inclisiran, anti-angiopoietin-like 3 drugs, and apolipoprotein C-III inhibitors. Their effectiveness in women will be discussed in a separate section.

Keywords

Angiopoietin-like 3
Apoprotein III
Cardiovascular disease
Familial chylomicronemia syndrome
High-density lipoprotein
Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia
LDL receptors
Lipid-lowering therapy
Lipoprotein(a)
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
Proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9
Triglycerides

INTRODUCTION

Death due to cardiovascular disease ranks the highest globally.[1] Majority of these deaths can be prevented by effective control of the risk factors.[2] One of the most established risk factors for cardiovascular disease is dyslipidaemia.[3] The 2025 Focused Update for the management of dyslipidemias has established the role of statins as the first line drug in managing cholesterol. However, there are a subset of patients who have severe dyslipidemia that is refractory to statins;[4] and despite receiving adequate statin therapy, some patients may develop cardiovascular disease. This has led to the identification of new targets such as triglycerides (TG), non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, lipoprotein a (Lp(a)), which can address this unmet need to lower CV risk. Novel anti-lipid drugs that target various sites of lipid metabolism are being developed and evaluated to improve the outcomes of such patients. Figure 1 shows the different stages in the lipid cycle targeted by the novel lipid-lowering drugs, some of which are summarized as below-

Different targets of anti-lipid drugs. (ACL:ATP citrate lyase, HMGCR: 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme reductase, FA: Fatty acid, TG: Triglyceride, MTP: Microsomal transfer protein, LIPA: lysosomal acid lipase, LDLR: low-density lipoprotein receptors, RGX-501: Gene therapy that corrects LDLR deficiency, PCSK9: Proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9, CSL-112: infused APOA1 peptide, HDL: High-density lipo protein, ABCA1/G1: ATP-binding cassette protein A1 and G1, LCAT: Lecithin cholesterol acyl transferase, LDL: Low-density lipoprotein, APO: apolipoprotein, DGAT: Diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase, CM: Chylomicron, ANGPTL: Angiopoietin-like 3, APOC3: Apo-protein CIII)
Figure 1:
Different targets of anti-lipid drugs. (ACL:ATP citrate lyase, HMGCR: 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme reductase, FA: Fatty acid, TG: Triglyceride, MTP: Microsomal transfer protein, LIPA: lysosomal acid lipase, LDLR: low-density lipoprotein receptors, RGX-501: Gene therapy that corrects LDLR deficiency, PCSK9: Proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9, CSL-112: infused APOA1 peptide, HDL: High-density lipo protein, ABCA1/G1: ATP-binding cassette protein A1 and G1, LCAT: Lecithin cholesterol acyl transferase, LDL: Low-density lipoprotein, APO: apolipoprotein, DGAT: Diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase, CM: Chylomicron, ANGPTL: Angiopoietin-like 3, APOC3: Apo-protein CIII)

  1. Drugs targeting low-density lipoprotein (LDL) – ezetimibe, bempedoic acid, PCSK9 inhibitors, inclisiran, anti-apolipoprotein B (Apo B) drugs – mipomersen

  2. Drugs targeting TG – microsomal TG transfer protein inhibitors – lomitapide, anti-apolipoprotein C-III (Apo CIII) drugs

  3. Drugs targeting both – angiopoietin-like 3 (ANGPTL3) inhibitors.

This review will focus on inclisiran, ANGPTL3 inhibitors, and Apo CIII inhibitors.

INCLISIRAN

Inclisiran is a novel LDL-reducing drug which acts through the inhibition of Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9).

Mechanism of action

Inclisiran is a synthetic small interfering RNA (siRNA) with a double-stranded structure, targeting the complementary messenger RNA (mRNA) that codes for the PCSK9 protein. By preventing the translation, thus the production of PCSK9, Inclisiran inhibits the recycling of LDL receptors from the surface of the liver. Subsequently, there is an increase in the number of LDL receptors on the surface of the liver thereby enhancing the removal of LDL cholesterol from the blood [Figure 2].

Mechanism of action of inclisiran. (LDL-CH: LDL Cholesterol, PCSK9: Proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9)
Figure 2:
Mechanism of action of inclisiran. (LDL-CH: LDL Cholesterol, PCSK9: Proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9)

The GalNAc ligand on inclisiran has high affinity to the asialoglycoprotein receptor expressed on the liver. This enables specific uptake of the drug by the liver where PCSK9 is synthesized. Once inclisiran is internalized, inclisiran is taken up by the RNA-induced silencing complex, which degrades the PCSK9 mRNA. This Inclisiran-RISC complex remains stable over a long period of time enabling twice-yearly administration of inclisiran.[5]

Dosage and administration

Inclisiran is available as an injectable SC solution of 284 mg/1.5 mL (prefilled syringe).

After the 1st dose, 2nd dose is given after 3 months and thereafter every 6 months.

Side effects

The most common side effect of Inclisiran is injection site reactions (5–10% cases). Most of them are mild and transient and do not require discontinuation of treatment. They tend to reduce with repeated injections. Diarrhea and headaches are occasionally reported. The role of inclisiran in worsening insulin resistance needs further evaluation.

Trials on Inclisiran

Effectiveness in cholesterol reduction

The ORION and VICTORIAN trial series have established the safety and efficacy of inclisiran in LDL-C reduction [Table 1].[6-11]

Table 1: Summary of trials with inclisiran.
Name of the trial Inclusion criteria Main results/status
ORION-1[6] Adults with elevated LDL-C, CVD/high risk, on maximally tolerated LLT or statin-intolerant Dose-dependent LDL-C and PCSK9 reductions; up to ~50% LDL-C drop at ~180 days; safe.
ORION-3[10]
Long-term follow-up trial
Long-term follow-up of participants in ORION-1 LDL-C reduction by 30 weeks was 49.5%; Reduction sustained at 4 years (47.2%).
ORION-4
Ongoing trial
ASCVD (MI, stroke, PAD), ~15,000 patients; on background therapy Large outcomes trial; ongoing, event-driven, completion ~2026; no results yet.
ORION-5[7] Homozygous FH; baseline LDL-C very high despite maximal LLT±apheresis No significant LDL-C reduction versus placebo at day 150; safety similar.
ORION-9[8]
Phase 3 double blind trial
Heterozygous FH, LDL ≥100 mg/dL, on max statin±ezetimibe ~39–50% LDL-C reduction; safety profile good; injection-site reactions more frequent.
ORION-10[9]
Phase 3 RCT
ASCVD, LDL >70 mg/dL, on statins LDL-C reduction of 50–56% at 17 months; consistent and safe.
ORION-11[9]
Phase 3 RCT
ASCVD or risk equivalents. Refractory elevated LDL ~46–50% reduction in LDL; safety similar; strong goal attainment.
ORION-8[11]
Long-term follow-up trial
Additional 3-year follow-up of ORION 9,10, and 11 trials Average LDL-C reduction of ~50–78.4% achieved pre-specified LDL-C targets.
ORION-18 Asian patients with ASCVD/high ASCVD risk, elevated LDL-C despite LLT ~57% LDL-C reduction at day 330; 72% achieved ≥50% decrease; safety similar.
VICTORION-difference High/very high CV risk, not at LDL-C goal despite optimized LLT Day 360: ~59% versus ~24% LDL-C reduction; goal attainment~85% versus 31%
VICTORION-initiate[14] ASCVD, Inclisiran first versus usual care Day 330: ~60% versus ~7% LDL-C reduction; goal attainment much higher; safety good.
VICTORION-inception[16] Post ACS with high LDL 45.6% reduction in LDL at 11 months
VICTORION mono[17] Treatment naïve without preexisting ASCVD LDL reduction 46.5%, better than ezetimibe or placebo
VICTORION-intervention Post-revascularization patients (PCI or limb) Ongoing; no results yet.
VICTORION-inclusion ASCVD or risk equivalent; LDL-C elevated despite therapy; diverse/under-represented populations Ongoing; no results yet.
VICTORION-2 prevent[20] Pre-existing ASCVD Ongoing
VICTORION-1 prevent High CV risk, primary prevention (no prior ASCVD) Large event-driven trial; ongoing.
VICTORION-challenge ASCVD/high risk, LDL-C ≥70 despite statins±ezetimibe; inclisiran versus bempedoic acid Ongoing; results awaited.

CVD: Cardiovascular disease, LDL-C: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LLT: Lipid-lowering therapy, PCSK9: proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin Type 9, ASCVD: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, CV: Cardiovascular disease, MI: Myocardial infarction, PAD: peripheral artery disease, FH: Familial hypercholesterolemia, ACS: Acute coronary syndrome, PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention

Key points in the pooled analysis of the major trials on inclisiran are summarized in Figure 3.[12,13,15]

Key points of pooled analysis of trials on Inclisiran. (LDL: Low-density lipoprotein, HDL: High-density lipoprotein, MACE: Major adverse cardiac events, RCT: Randomised control trial).
Figure 3:
Key points of pooled analysis of trials on Inclisiran. (LDL: Low-density lipoprotein, HDL: High-density lipoprotein, MACE: Major adverse cardiac events, RCT: Randomised control trial).

Effectiveness in special groups

The ORION 18 study demonstrated similar effectiveness of inclisiran in Asian patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or at high risk of ASCVD. In patients with chronic kidney disease, especially those with stage 4, inclisiran has shown potential, with the data from ORION-7 suggesting that it might be beneficial.

Effectiveness in CV event reduction

After the overwhelming reduction in LDL levels with inclisiran had been demonstrated, investigators studied the trials of inclisiran to evaluate whether the benefit in LDL reduction could be translated into clinical benefit.

Data from the ORION-9, ORION-10, and ORION-11 were evaluated for the major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) rate, which is a composite of CV death, cardiac arrest, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), and fatal and non-fatal stroke rates. Over 18 months, among 3655 patients, 8.3% experienced MACE, including 2.0% rate of fatal and non-fatal MIs and 0.8% rate of fatal and non-fatal strokes. Inclisiran significantly reduced composite MACE (odds ratio [OR]: 0.74 [0.58–0.94]) but not fatal and non-fatal MIs (OR: 0.80 [0.50–1.27]) or fatal and non-fatal stroke (OR: 0.86 [0.41–1.81]).[18]

However, in a pooled meta-analysis including the ORION 1, 5, 9, 10, 11, 15, and VICTORION INITIATE trials, differences in the risk of major adverse CV events, MI, stroke, and CV mortality were not significant between the inclisiran and control groups. The rates of all-cause mortality were also similar.[15]

In this regard, the ORION 4 trial is underway. The ORION 4 is a multinational study, intended to be conducted at 180 clinical sites in the UK and the USA. It intends to involve 15,000 adults with pre-existing CV disease. Patients will be randomized to inclisiran versus placebo in a 1:1 ratio. It aims to evaluate the reduction in MACE rates with inclisiran over 5 years. The estimated completion for the ORION-4 trial’s primary endpoint is July 2026, with the study’s overall completion estimated to be around December 2049.[19]

VICTORION-2 PREVENT study is another similar phase 3 study designed to test the effectiveness of inclisiran in reducing MACE rates in patients with pre-existing CV disease. It is presently in the recruiting phase.[20]

Timeline of the major inclisiran trials is shown in Figure 4.

Timeline of major inclisiran trials.
Figure 4:
Timeline of major inclisiran trials.

Inclisiran-key takeaway points

  1. Inclisiran can be used in heterozygous (both familial and non-familial) hypercholesterolemia, where LDL is not in the recommended range, despite appropriate medical therapy

  2. Diabetics, in high risk, very high risk or extremely high-risk categories, with refractory hyperlipidemia, inclisiran can be added to the preexisting lipid-lowering therapies

  3. Inclisiran may be considered as the first choice over other lipid-lowering drugs in patients with ASCVD with uncontrolled lipids on maximally tolerated statin therapy

  4. Inclisiran may be considered in post-acute coronary syndrome patients (within 5 weeks of discharge) with uncontrolled LDL despite statin therapy

  5. Inclisiran may be considered in treatment naïve, adults with LDL of 100–190 mg/dL and 10-year ASCVD risk of <7.5%, even without pre-existing ASCVD, diabetes, or familial hypercholesterolemia (FH)

  6. Inclisiran may reduce CV event rate and mortality and may be considered in patients with ASCVD to improve the long-term outcomes.

Guideline recommendations on inclisiran

2025 ESC guidelines recommend inclisiran for patients with uncontrolled LDL in spite of statin or other lipid-lowering therapies (CLASS 1 LEVEL A).[21]

ANGPTL3 INHIBITORS

ANGPTL3 inhibitors can lower both LDL and TG levels.

Mechanism of action

ANGPTL3 is a glycoprotein secreted by liver cells that inhibit the lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and endothelial lipase (EL) in tissues. Inhibitors of ANGPTL3 increase the LPL and EL activity, thereby allowing LPL and EL to enhance the clearance of very-LDL (VLDL) remnants through remnant receptors in the liver, resulting in the decrease of LDL-C levels in an LDLR-independent manner. There is a lowering of the total cholesterol and TG levels also [Figure 5].

Mechanism of action of angiopoietin-like 3 inhibitors. (LDL: Low-density lipoprotein, VLDL/VLDL-C: Very low-density lipoprotein, EL: Endothelial lipase, LPL: Lipoprotein lipase, ANGPTL3: Angiopoietin-like 3 inhibitors)
Figure 5:
Mechanism of action of angiopoietin-like 3 inhibitors. (LDL: Low-density lipoprotein, VLDL/VLDL-C: Very low-density lipoprotein, EL: Endothelial lipase, LPL: Lipoprotein lipase, ANGPTL3: Angiopoietin-like 3 inhibitors)

Table 2 lists the different types of ANGPTL3 inhibitors.

Table 2: ANGPTL3 inhibitors.
S. No. Name Features
1 Evinacumab Monoclonal antibody targeting ANGPTL3
2 Zodasiran siRNA therapy against ANGPTL3, currently under investigation for mixed dyslipidemia
3 Solbinsiran siRNA therapy that aims to reduce ANGPTL3 expression, shown to be effective in preclinical studies and early human trials
4 Vupanorsen Discontinued due to side effects

ANGPTL3: Angiopoietin-like 3, siRNA: Small interfering RNA

Evinacumab

Evinacumab is an intravenously administered monoclonal antibody targeting ANGPTL3. Evinacumab is approved by the FDA as an adjunctive therapy for patients with homozygous FH (HoFH) older than 5 years of age.

Dosage and administration

The recommended dose of evinacumab is 15 mg/kg, intravenous, once every 4 weeks.

Side effects

Injection site reactions are the most common side effects. Other side effects are hypersensitivity reactions, nasopharyngitis, nausea, influenza-like illness, dizziness, extremity pain, and rhinorrhea.

Clinical trials with evinacumab

Clinical trials demonstrated effective LDL reduction as summarized in Table 3.[22-26]

Table 3: Summary of trials with evinacumab.
Name of the trial Inclusion criteria Main results/status
ELIPSE HoFH trial
(65 patients)[22]
Age ≥12 years, with homozygous FH,
LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL on LLT
Mean LDL-C reduced by ~47% after 24 weeks, 53.5% reduction in patients with “null/null” variant. More adverse events in the placebo group. Absolute reduction in LDL level was 132.1 mg/dL.
Long-term study in HoFH[23] Age ≥12 years with HoFH By 24 weeks: mean LDL-C reduction ~43.6% (absolute 3.4 mmol/L) in overall population, i41.7% n adults, and 55.4% in adolescents; sustained up to 120 weeks.
Pediatric HoFH (511 years) Trial[24] Children aged 511 with genetically or clinically confirmed HoFH with uncontrolled lipids Mean LDL-C reductions 48%; 79% achieved ≥50% reduction; substantial absolute drop (~132 mg/dL). Good tolerability
Cardiovascular Outcome/Event-Free Survival in HoFH (Open-Label Extension in France) (“OLE ELIPSE HoFH”) HoFH patients, stable lipidlowering therapy including apheresis; ≥age 12 yrs. At 6 months: 56% LDLC reduction (absolute ~3.7 mmol/L), sustained over 3.5 years. No cardiovascular events in the evinacumab group versus 13 events (5/21≈24%) in control over~4 years.
Realworld effectiveness and safety of Evinacumab in children and adults with HoFH[25] Retrospective cohort of 24 patients (age range 5–84 years) with genetically or clinically confirmed HoFH Mean LDL-C reduction 53.2% (±4.1). More proportion achieving LDL of <70 mg/dL. Well tolerated with mild adverse effects
Evinacumab in Patients with Refractory Hypercholesterolemia[26] Adults (18–80 years) with refractory hypercholesterolemia, defined as LDL ≥70 mg/dL in those with atherosclerosis or ≥100 mg/dL without atherosclerosis, despite maximally tolerated LLT At week16, significant LDL-C reduction with both subcutaneous and intravenous administration.

HoFH: Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, CVD: Cardiovascular disease, LDL-C: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, FH: Familial hypercholesterolemia, LLT: Lipid-lowering therapy

A long-term randomized clinical trial was done in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia (with either heterozygous FH or pre-existing ASCVD without FH) where a 2-week screening period followed by a 16-week double-blind treatment period for subcutaneous regimens or a 24-week double-blind treatment period for intravenous regimens, 48-week open-label treatment period for intravenous treatment only, and a 24-week follow-up period. At 72 weeks, evinacumab, 15 mg/kg, reduced mean LDL-C level by 45.5%, reduced mean Apo B by 38.0%, non-HDL cholesterol by 48.4%, total cholesterol by 42.6%, and median fasting TG by 57.2%. Serious adverse events occurred in 9.4%, which were unrelated to the drug.[27]

Evinacumab-key takeaway points

  1. Evinacumab is indicated in homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia refractory to statin therapy and/or other lipid-lowering therapies

  2. Evinacumab may be considered in those with refractory hypercholesterolemia, including those with heterozygous FH

  3. Evinacumab may be considered in those with established clinical ASCVD without FH.

Guideline recommendation for Evinacumab

The ESC 2025 guidelines recommend evinacumab in patients with HoFH, with high LDL despite statins and PCSK9.[21]

APO CIII INHIBITORS

Apo CIII inhibitors primarily lower TGs.

Mechanism of action

Apo CIII is a 79 amino acid glycoprotein synthesized principally in the liver and is an important component of VLDL, LDL, Lp (a), and HDL particles. Apo CIII inhibits the enzyme LPL and inhibits the hepatic uptake of TG-rich lipoprotein (TRL) remnants and LDL particles. Apo C III also increases the release of VLDL from the liver. Inhibition of Apo CIII thereby increases the LPL activity and facilitates the hepatic uptake and clearance of TRL remnant particles and LDL, leading to lowering of their plasma levels [Figure 6].

Mechanism of action of apolipoprotein C-III inhibitors. (LDL: Low-density lipoprotein, TRL: Triglycerides-rich lipoprotein, LPL: lipoprotein lipase, HL: Hepatic lipase, VLDL: Very low-density lipoprotein, SDC1: Syndecan-1, LRP1: LDLR-related protein 1, LDLR: LDL receptor)
Figure 6:
Mechanism of action of apolipoprotein C-III inhibitors. (LDL: Low-density lipoprotein, TRL: Triglycerides-rich lipoprotein, LPL: lipoprotein lipase, HL: Hepatic lipase, VLDL: Very low-density lipoprotein, SDC1: Syndecan-1, LRP1: LDLR-related protein 1, LDLR: LDL receptor)

Examples of Apo CIII inhibitors are summarized in Table 4.

Table 4: Examples of Apo CIII inhibitors.
S. No. Name Feature
1 Volanesorsen Antisense oligonucleotide that inhibits Apo CIII
2 Olezarsen Antisense oligonucleotide that reduces Apo C-III production
3 Plozasiran Small interfering RNA that works similarly to olezarsen and is in advanced clinical development.

Apo CIII: Apolipoprotein C-III

Volanesorsen

Volanesorsen is an antisense oligonucleotide that reduces the synthesis of Apo C-III.

Dosage and administration

It is administered subcutaneously at 100–400 mg once a week, with subsequent doses after 3 months.

Side effects

Mild-to-moderate injection-site reactions and thrombocytopenia are the most common side effects.

Effectiveness in TG reduction

In a phase 2 trial, patients with elevated fasting TG levels of 350–2,000 mg/dL and patients with fasting TG levels of 225–2,000 mg/dL refractory to fibrate therapy, volanesorsen 100, 200, or 300 mg SC weekly was given for 13 weeks. There were significant dose-dependent reductions in Apo CIII by ~80% in the single treatment group and ~71% as an add-on to fibrates. There was also a 31.3–70.9% reduction in TG levels and a 45.7% increase in HDL-C. There was a dose-dependent elevation in LDL-C; however, non-HDL-C or ApoB levels remained the same.[28] Trials establishing the safety and efficacy of volanesorsen are summarized in Table 5.[29-32]

Table 5: Summary of clinical trials on volanesorsen.
Name of the trial Inclusion criteria Main results/status
APPROACH trial (RCT)[29]
- 66 patients
Adults (≥18 years) with familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) - fasting TG ≥750mg/dL
300 mg SC weekly injections of volanesorsen or placebo.
77% reduction in TG versus ~18% increase in placebo at 3 months.
Significant reduction in ApoC III (84% versus increase of 6.1%); marked reductions in pancreatitis events; thrombocytopenia (77%) and injection-site reactions observed. No severe thrombocytopenia noted
COMPASS trial[30]
-113 patients
Adults (≥18 years) with multifactorial severe hypertriglyceridemia (TG level between 500 and 1,261 mg/dL) or FCS and fasting TG ≥500mg/dL Mean TG reduction 71.2% at 3 months versus 0.9% in placebo. Mean absolute TG drop ~869 mg/dL. Sustained effect up to 26 weeks. Side effects-injectionsite reactions, one case of very low platelets (<50,000/µL), one case of serum sickness.
VOL4002 study[31] 22 adults from the APPROACH and/or APPROACH-OLE trials were followed up to assess the long-term effectiveness of volanesorsen Apart from a significant and sustained reduction in triglyceride levels, a 74% reduction in pancreatitis rates was found compared to the prior 5 years
OpenLabel Extension in FCS (APPROACH and COMPASS populations+treatmentnaïve) Extended follow-up for 12-24 months to assess longer-term safety and efficacy Sustained reductions in TG over time in all groups, nearly 50–66% at 24 months
BROADEN study[32]
- 40 patients
Adults with familial partial lipodystrophy (FPLD) with concomitant elevated TG and diabetes weekly SC volanesorsen 300 mg or placebo for 52 weeks. TG reduction at 3 months was 88% in the volanesorsen group and 22% in the placebo group. 53% reduction in hepatic fat fraction, some effects on glycated hemoglobin. Safety profile consistent with other studies

TG: Triglycerides, RCT: Randomized controlled trial, Apo CIII: Apolipoprotein C-III, APPROACH: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Placed, Controlled, Healthcare-based trial

Volanesorsen-key takeaway points

  1. Volanesorsen is indicated for patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome and severe hypertriglyceridemia

  2. There is potential to extend its use for other causes of hypertriglyceridemia and familial partial lipodystrophy.

Recommendation on volanesorsen

Volanesorsen was approved by the European Union in May 2019 to treat adults with familial chylomicronemia syndrome with uncontrolled TG levels. However, due to the increased risk of thrombocytopenia, it has not been approved by the US FDA.

Olezarsen

Olezarsen is an antisense oligonucleotide that degrades the Apo C-III mRNA in the liver, thereby lowering the ApoCIII levels.

Dosage and administration

It is given as a subcutaneous, monthly once (80 mg/0.8 mL) injection.

Side effects

Injection site reactions, thrombocytopenia, and arthralgias are the most common side effects. Increased fasting glucose levels and elevated liver enzymes can occur rarely.

Effectiveness in TG reduction

Clinical trials of safety and efficacy with olezarsen are summarized in Table 6.[33-35]

Table 6: Summary of trials with olezarsen.
Name of the trial Inclusion criteria Main results/status
BALANCE study[33]
-Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
- 66 patients
- Olezarsen 80 mg or 50 mg or placebo subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 49 weeks
Adults with familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS), with fasting triglyceride levels≥880 mg/dL 80mg reduced fasting TG by 42.5% (P≈0.0084). 50 mg reduced by 21.5% (not statistically significant).
Apo CIII levels decreased significantly (73.7% with
80 mg, 65.5% with 50 mg)
Fewer acute pancreatitis events.Favorable safety profile.
BRIDGE-TIMI 73a trial[34] Adults with hypertriglyceridemia: either “moderate” (TG 150–499 mg/dL) plus elevated cardiovascular risk, or “severe” elevation of TG (TG ≥500mg/dL) By 6 months, 50-mg reduced TG by 49.3% and 80-mg reduced TG levels by 53.1%
Significant reduction in Apo CIII, Apo B, and non-HDL cholesterol levels, no change in the LDL-C. Adverse events similar in the three groups
ESSENCETIMI 73b trial[35] Adults with either TG
150499 mg/d)+elevated cardiovascular risk (ASCVD or high risk), or TG ≥500 mg/dL
At 6 months, TG reductions: 58.4% (50 mg) and 60.6% (80 mg) versus placebo.
At 12 months, TG reduction 50.7% in both dose groups. Injection site reactions and mild liver enzyme elevations seen.

TG: Triglycerides, RCT: Randomized controlled trial, Apo CIII: Apolipoprotein C-III, LDL-C: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, ASCVD: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing olezarsen vs placebo in patients with dyslipidemia showed a significant reduction in ApoCIII across dosages, significant TG reduction, 49–50% reduction with 50 mg, and 52% with 80 mg. Suggests a 50 mg dose (very 4 weeks) may be near optimal; higher dose yields diminishing incremental benefit.

Olezarsen-key takeaway points

  1. Olezarsen is indicated in familial chylomicronemia syndrome with elevated TG levels

  2. Olezarsen may be used for those with TG 150– 499 mg/dL and elevated CV risk, or severe hypertriglyceridemia with TG >500 mg/dL.

Recommendation of Olezarsen

Olezarsen can be used as an adjunct to diet for adults with familial chylomicronemia syndrome. It was approved by both the U.S. FDA and the European Union for the same.

Plozasiran

Plozasiran is a small interfering RNA targeting the hepatocyte Apo CIII.

Dosage and administration

10 mg/25 mg/50 mg subcutaneously every 3 months.

Side effects

Abdominal pain, nasopharyngitis, headache, and nausea are the most common side effects. Hyperglycemia can occur in those with prediabetes or diabetes.

Effectiveness in TG reduction

In a 48-week RCT, plozasiran was evaluated in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia (TG 150–499 mg/dL and either LDL ≥70 mg/dL or non-HDL cholesterol ≥100 mg/dL). Plozasiran was given in the dose of 10 mg, 25 mg, or 50 mg on day 1 and 12th week (quarterly doses) or 50 mg of plozasiran on day 1 and 24th week (half-yearly doses). A significant dose-dependent reduction in the fasting TG level was observed with plozasiran (62.4% with the 50-mg-quarterly dose and 44.2% with the 50-mg-half-yearly dose). Worsening glycemic control was the most observed side effect.[36]

SHASTA-2 trial was a landmark multi-center trial where 2 subcutaneous doses of plozasiran (10, 25, or 50 mg) or matched placebo were given day 1 and 12th week to adults with severely elevated TG levels (500–4000 mg/dL). A follow-up was done until 48 weeks. Trials with plozasiran are summarized in Table 7.[37,38]

Table 7: Summary of trials with plozasiran.
Name of the trial Inclusion criteria Main results/status
Plozasiran for mixed hyperlipidemia Adults with mixed hyperlipidemia: TG 150499 mg/dL with either LDLC ≥70 mg/dL or nonHDL ≥100 mg/dL At 24 weeks, TG reduction was 49.8% with 10 mg quarterly: 56% with 25 mg quarterly: 62.4% with 50 mg quarterly, and 44.2% with 50 mg halfyearly. Worsening glycemic control more frequent.
SHASTA-4 Study[37] (phase 2b study) Adults (≥18) with severe hypertriglyceridemia: documented fasting TG ≥500 mg/dL Significant dose-dependent reduction in triglyceride levels by 57% and ApoCIII by 77% by 24 weeks.
PALISADE study[38]
- 75 patients
Adults with genetically confirmed or clinically diagnosed familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) or persistent chylomicronemia with very high triglycerides Median TG reductions 80% (25 mg) and 78% (50 mg) at 10 months; At 12 months: 78% (25 mg) and (50 mg). 83% reduction in risk of adjudicated acute pancreatitis events
MUIR3 study Adults (≥18 years), with hypertriglyceridemia (HTG): TG 150-499 mg/dL Ongoing trial

TG: Triglycerides, Apo CIII: Apolipoprotein C-III, LDL-C: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HDL: High-density lipoprotein

Plozasiran-key takeaway points

  1. Plozasiran may be used for those with familial chylomicronemia syndrome and very high TG levels

  2. Plozasiran may be used for adults with severe hypertriglyceridemia

  3. Plozasiran may be used in mixed hyperlipidemia: TG 150–499 mg/dL with either LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL or nonHDL ≥100 mg/dL.

Recommendations for Plozasiran

Plozasiran is not yet approved by the FDA for familial chylomicronemia.

GUIDELINE RECOMMENDATION OF APO CIII INHIBITORS

The ESC 2025 guidelines recommend volanesorsen (300 mg/week) for severe hypertriglyceridemia (>750 mg) due to familial chylomicronemia syndrome (CLASS IIA, LEVEL B).[21]

ROLE OF NOVEL LLT DRUGS IN WOMEN

In women, serum cholesterol levels vary with age and tend to rise significantly after menopause, reaching higher levels over time than in men.[39] The rate of CV disease tends to rise in 7th decade in women. Despite later age of onset of ASCVD in women, women tend to have higher LDL at baseline.[40] In those with HoFH, total- and LDL-C levels are higher in girls than boys. By adulthood, women tend to have a higher LDL-C, are more likely to be underdiagnosed, and are less likely to receive lipid-lowering treatment than men. This leads to severe atherosclerotic CV disease risk in women.[41]

Women do not generally tolerate high-intensity statins due to a higher rate of myalgia compared to men.[42] Women are less likely to achieve guideline-recommended LDL-C targets driven by higher statin intolerance, lower high-intensity statin use, and smaller LDL-C reductions even on high-intensity therapy.[43] This could partly be driven by genetic polymorphisms in PCSK9 genes. The mutated G allele of rs505151 can lead to a higher cholesterol level in women while leading to a lower cholesterol level in men, thereby increasing the CV risk.[44] The resulting variability in LDL-C levels makes women more prone to ASCVD. In patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome, there is marked elevation of TG levels and risk of pancreatitis. While chylomicronemia is more common in men, women tend to have increased risks during pregnancy.[45]

Thus, women represent a challenging group where there is both higher prevalence of dyslipidemia and ASCVD, while most of them tend to be under-treated or receive ineffective drugs. Inclisiran safety and efficacy are proven in par in women, and evidence is shown in Figure 7.[46,47]

Inclisiran in women. (LDL: Low-density lipoprotein, Lp(a): Lipoprotein a)
Figure 7:
Inclisiran in women. (LDL: Low-density lipoprotein, Lp(a): Lipoprotein a)

In HoFH with refractory hyperlipidemia, evinacumab can be recommended as a third-line drug after high-dose statins (+ezetimibe and/bempedoic acid) and PCSK9 inhibitors.[41] In the ELIPSE HoFH trial, 56% were women, and evinacumab leads to a significant relative LDL reduction which was sustained over 24 weeks.[22] In another large cohort of patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, including 57 (49.1%) females, and in a study of 14 pediatric patients (5–11 years), with 57% females, evinacumab was found to be equally effective in women.[23,24]

In patients with severely elevated TG levels due to FCS, trials such as APPROACH trial (17/33 female)[29] and the BROADEN study (29/40 female)[32] demonstrated that volanesorsen was effective in reducing TG levels, but with the side effect of thrombocytopenia.

Olezarsen, another Apo CIII inhibitor was tested in patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome in the BALANCE study, where 58% were female, the BRIDGE–TIMI 73a, where 42% were female, and the ESSENCE–TIMI 73b trial, included 40% females. Olezarsen was found to significantly reduce TG and Apo CIII levels, and no gender specific difference in effectiveness was reported.[33-35]

Thus, drugs such as inclisiran, ANGPTL3 inhibitors, and Apo CIII inhibitors, which can overcome the side effects of statins, may be more effective in women. Although most of the studies have reported equivalent effectiveness in women, lack of gender specific randomized control trials limits data on women-specific use of these drugs and information to address special challenges in managing dyslipidemia in women such as during pregnancy and breastfeeding.

CONCLUSION

Despite an alarming rise in heart disease and the known risks of LDL-C, statin usage remains low, particularly in low-middle-income countries (6.7%) and even in the U.S. (35%). Challenges persist due to patient-related issues such as non-compliance, lack of affordability, lack of availability, inadequate dosing, and side effects of drugs leading to intolerance and presence of genetic variants that make statins ineffective. Lack of data and special considerations like pregnancy make controlling lipids in women especially challenging. Research into different targets in the lipid cycle has produced new drug classes targeting LDL and other factors like TGs and Lp(a) that contribute to residual CV risk. In this review, three such novel groups of drugs have been reviewed. Their respective studies have clearly established their effectiveness in lowering cholesterol levels but clinical evidence to show their effectiveness in preventing CV disease is still emerging. In the future, further research may address this therapeutic gap in heart disease prevention and improve the CV outcomes of patients. There is also a need to perform women-focused randomized control trials to assist in managing dyslipidemia in women better.

Ethical approval:

Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent:

Patient’s consent is not required as there are no patients in this study.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. , , , , , , et al. World Heart Federation. World Heart Report 2023 Confronting the World’s Number One Killer; 2023
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , et al. 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI Guideline for the Management of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025;85:2135-237.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , . Impact of Lipids on Cardiovascular Health: JACC Health Promotion Series. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:1141-56.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . Evolving Management of Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol: A Personalized Approach to Preventing Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Across the Risk Continuum. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023;12:e028892.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . Small Interfering Ribonucleic Acid for Cholesterol Lowering-Inclisiran: Inclisiran for Cholesterol Lowering. J Clin Lipidol. 2022;16:574-82.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , et al. Inclisiran in Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk with Elevated LDL Cholesterol. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1430-40.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , et al. Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Inclisiran in Patients with Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Results from the ORION-5 Randomized Clinical Trial. Circulation. 2024;149:354-62.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , et al. Inclisiran for the Treatment of Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1520-30.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , et al. Two Phase 3 Trials of Inclisiran in Patients with Elevated LDL Cholesterol. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1507-19.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , et al. Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Twice-Yearly Inclisiran in Patients with ASCVD and Elevated LDL-C: A Post-hoc Analysis of ORION-3, a 4-year Open-Label Extension Study. J Clin Lipidol. 2023;17:e56-7.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , et al. Inclisiran Administration Potently and Durably Lowers LDL-C Over an Extended-term Follow-up: The ORION-8 Trial. Cardiovasc Res. 2024;120:1400-10.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , . Meta-Analysis of Inclisiran for the Treatment of Hypercholesterolemia. Am J Cardiol. 2020;134:69-73.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , . A Real-World Retrospective Analysis of Secondary Prevention Patients Treated with Inclisiran over 27 Months. Clin Med Insights Cardiol. 2025;19:11795468251337425.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , et al. An “Inclisiran First” Strategy vs Usual Care in Patients with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024;83:1939-52.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , et al. Safety and Efficacy of Inclisiran in Hyperlipidemia: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2025;8(2):e70039.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , et al. LDL-C Management with Inclisiran Plus Usual Care vs Usual Care Alone in Participants with Recent Acute Coronary Syndrome: VICTORION-INCEPTION. J Clin Lipidol. 2025;19:e109-10.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , et al. Safety and Lipid-Lowering Efficacy of Inclisiran Monotherapy in Patients Without ASCVD: The VICTORIONMono Randomized Clinical Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025;86:196-208.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , , et al. Inclisiran and Cardiovascular Events: A Patient-Level Analysis of Phase III Trials. Eur Heart J. 2023;44:129-38.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Trial, Assessing the Impact of Inclisiran on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Participants with Established Cardiovascular Disease (VICTORION-2 PREVENT) ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05030428. Available from: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05030428 [Last accessed on 2021 Nov 23]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. HPS-4/TIMI 65/ORION-4: A Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial Assessing the Effects of Inclisiran on Clinical Outcomes Among People With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease. Conditions ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03705234. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03705234 [Last accessed on 2018 Oct 30]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , , et al. 2025 Focused Update of the 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias {Developed by the Task Force for the Management of Dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS)} Eur Heart J. 2025;46:4359-78.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , , et al. Evinacumab for homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:711-20.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , , , et al. Evinacumab in Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolaemia: Long-term Safety and Efficacy. Eur Heart J. 2024;45:2422-3.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , , , et al. Evinacumab for Pediatric Patients with Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia. Circulation. 2024;149:343-53.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , , , et al. Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Evinacumab in Children and Adults With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia: A Multisite US Perspective-Brief Report. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2025;45:1310-5.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , , , et al. Evinacumab in Patients with Refractory Hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:2307-19.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , , , , et al. Longer-Term Efficacy and Safety of Evinacumab in Patients with Refractory Hypercholesterolemia. JAMA Cardiol. 2023;8:1070-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , , , , et al. Antisense Inhibition of Apolipoprotein C-III in Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:438-47.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. , , , , , , et al. Volanesorsen and Triglyceride Levels in Familial Chylomicronemia Syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:531-42.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. , , , , , , et al. Efficacy and Safety of Volanesorsen in Patients with Multifactorial Chylomicronaemia (COMPASS): A Multicentre, Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3 Trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021;9:264-75.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. , , , , , , et al. Long-term Effects of Volanesorsen on Triglycerides and Pancreatitis in Patients with Familial Chylomicronaemia Syndrome (FCS) in the UK Early Access to Medicines Scheme (EAMS) Atherosclerosis. . 2023;375:67-74.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. , , , , , , et al. Assessment of Efficacy and Safety of Volanesorsen for Treatment of Metabolic Complications in Patients with Familial Partial Lipodystrophy: Results of the BROADEN Study: Volanesorsen in FPLD; The BROADEN Study. J Clin Lipidol. 2022;16:833-49.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. , , , , , , et al. Olezarsen, Acute Pancreatitis, and Familial Chylomicronemia Syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2024;390:1781-92.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. , , , , , , et al. Olezarsen for Hypertriglyceridemia in Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk. N Engl J Med. 2024;390:1770-80.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. , , , , , , et al. Targeting APOC3 with Olezarsen in Moderate Hypertriglyceridemia. N Engl J Med. 2025;393:1279-91.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. , , , , , , et al. Plozasiran, an RNA Interference Agent Targeting APOC3, for Mixed Hyperlipidemia. N Engl J Med. 2024;391:899-912.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. , , , , , , et al. Plozasiran (ARO-APOC3) for Severe Hypertriglyceridemia: The SHASTA-2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2024;9:620-30.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. , , , , , , et al. Plozasiran for Managing Persistent Chylomicronemia and Pancreatitis Risk. N Engl J Med. 2025;392:127-37.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. , , , , , , et al. Lipid Distributions in the Global Diagnostics Network across Five Continents. Eur Heart J. 2023;44:2305-18.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. , , , . Lipoprotein Metabolism, Dyslipidemia, and Lipid-Lowering Therapy in Women: A Comprehensive Review. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024;17:913.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. , , , . Sex Differences in Familial Hypercholesterolemia. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2023;25:861-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. , . Special Aspects of Cholesterol Metabolism in Women. Deutsch Ärztebl Int. 2024;121:401-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. , , , , , , et al. Sex Differences in LDL-C Control in a Primary Care Population: The PORTRAIT-DYS study. Atherosclerosis. 2023;384:117148.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. , , , , , . Characterization of LDLR rs5925 and PCSK9 rs505151 Genetic Variants Frequencies in Healthy Subjects from Northern Chile: Influence on Plasma Lipid Levels. J Clin Lab Anal. 2019;33:e23001.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. , , , , , , et al. Familial Chylomicronemia Syndrome: An Expert Clinical Review from the National Lipid Association. J Clin Lipidol. 2025;19:382-403.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. , , , , , , et al. Effects of Inclisiran in Patients with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Pooled Analysis of the ORION-10 and ORION-11 Randomized Trials. Mayo Clin Proc. 2024;99:1093-106.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. , , , , , , et al. Abstract 16311: Efficacy and Safety of Inclisiran According to Sex: A Pooled Analysis of the ORION 9, 10 and 11 Trials. Circulation. 2020;142(Suppl 3):A16311.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections