Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstracts
Cardiovascular, Case Report
Cardiovascular, Commentary
Cardiovascular, Editorial
Cardiovascular, Guest Editorial
Cardiovascular, Images in Cardiology
Cardiovascular, Interventional Round
Cardiovascular, Original Article
Cardiovascular, Perspective Review
Cardiovascular, Preface
Cardiovascular, Review Article
Cardiovascular, Student’s Corner
Case Report
Case Report, Cardiovascular
Case Reports
Case Series, Cardiovascular
Clinical Discussion
Clinical Rounds
CPC
Current Issue
Debate
Dedication
Editorial
Editorial Cardiovascular
Editorial, From the Publisher’s Desk
Expert Comments
Expert's Opinion
Genetic Autopsy
Genetics Autopsy
Guest Editorial, Cardiovascular
Image in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology, Cardiovascular
Interventional Round
Interventional Round, Cardiovascular
Interventional Rounds
Letter to Editor
Letter to Editor, Clinical Cardiology
Letter to the Editor
Media and news
Original Article
Original Article, Cardiovascular
Original Article, Cardiovascular Health
Practice in Medicine
Preface
Review Article
Review Article, Cardiovascular
Scientific Paper
Short Communication
Student's Corner
Supplementary
Supplemetary
WINCARS Activities
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstracts
Cardiovascular, Case Report
Cardiovascular, Commentary
Cardiovascular, Editorial
Cardiovascular, Guest Editorial
Cardiovascular, Images in Cardiology
Cardiovascular, Interventional Round
Cardiovascular, Original Article
Cardiovascular, Perspective Review
Cardiovascular, Preface
Cardiovascular, Review Article
Cardiovascular, Student’s Corner
Case Report
Case Report, Cardiovascular
Case Reports
Case Series, Cardiovascular
Clinical Discussion
Clinical Rounds
CPC
Current Issue
Debate
Dedication
Editorial
Editorial Cardiovascular
Editorial, From the Publisher’s Desk
Expert Comments
Expert's Opinion
Genetic Autopsy
Genetics Autopsy
Guest Editorial, Cardiovascular
Image in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology, Cardiovascular
Interventional Round
Interventional Round, Cardiovascular
Interventional Rounds
Letter to Editor
Letter to Editor, Clinical Cardiology
Letter to the Editor
Media and news
Original Article
Original Article, Cardiovascular
Original Article, Cardiovascular Health
Practice in Medicine
Preface
Review Article
Review Article, Cardiovascular
Scientific Paper
Short Communication
Student's Corner
Supplementary
Supplemetary
WINCARS Activities
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstracts
Cardiovascular, Case Report
Cardiovascular, Commentary
Cardiovascular, Editorial
Cardiovascular, Guest Editorial
Cardiovascular, Images in Cardiology
Cardiovascular, Interventional Round
Cardiovascular, Original Article
Cardiovascular, Perspective Review
Cardiovascular, Preface
Cardiovascular, Review Article
Cardiovascular, Student’s Corner
Case Report
Case Report, Cardiovascular
Case Reports
Case Series, Cardiovascular
Clinical Discussion
Clinical Rounds
CPC
Current Issue
Debate
Dedication
Editorial
Editorial Cardiovascular
Editorial, From the Publisher’s Desk
Expert Comments
Expert's Opinion
Genetic Autopsy
Genetics Autopsy
Guest Editorial, Cardiovascular
Image in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology, Cardiovascular
Interventional Round
Interventional Round, Cardiovascular
Interventional Rounds
Letter to Editor
Letter to Editor, Clinical Cardiology
Letter to the Editor
Media and news
Original Article
Original Article, Cardiovascular
Original Article, Cardiovascular Health
Practice in Medicine
Preface
Review Article
Review Article, Cardiovascular
Scientific Paper
Short Communication
Student's Corner
Supplementary
Supplemetary
WINCARS Activities
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
01 (
01
); 008-013
doi:
10.1055/s-0038-1656469

Importance of Proximal Angle in Generation of Abnormal Plaque at Coronary Bifurcation Lesions

Senior resident, Department of Cardiology, NIMS, India
Assistant Professor, Department of Cardiology, NIMS, India

deepthi.kodati@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Changing of linear blood flow to turbulence at branching points predisposes to development of obstructive coronary lesions. We hypothesize that in addition to bifurcation angle (BA), proximal (PA) and third angle (TA) of branching site are important in generating more vertices of blood flow.

METHODS: 65 normal and 36 significantly diseased LAD – D1, 72 normal and 27 significantly diseased LCX – OM, 73 normal and 16 significantly diseased RCA – PDA – PLV and 34 normal and 14 significantly diseased LMCA – LAD – LCX bifurcations were analyzed with QCA.

RESULTS: In LAD – D1 normal vs. significantly diseased bifurcations BA and PA were 78.2±13.2 vs. 65.1±11.3 (p <0.000) and 122.7±13.8 vs. 131.6.36±12.5 (p <0.001) respectively. In LCX – OM normal vs. significantly diseased bifurcations BA and PA were 76.8±13.6 vs. 60.7±13.8 (p=0.000) and 125.1±13.5 vs. 137.8±12.8 (p <0.000) respectively. In RCA - PDA – PLV normal vs. significantly diseased bifurcations BA, PA and TA were 91.1±13.8 vs. 71.5±15.9 (p 0.004), 113.0±14.1 vs. 128.4±20.2 (p=0.000), 118.2±21.7 vs. 133.8±12.4 (p=0.007) respectively. In LMCA –LAD – LCX normal vs. significantly diseased bifurcations BA, PA and TA were 84.0±39.1 vs. 73.0±17.6 (p >0. 32), 123.2±26.3 vs. 115.3±30.4 (p > 0.38), 130.3±27.3 vs. 137.5±33.5 (p >0.45) respectively. There was a significant difference but no correlation between the angles in normal and diseased bifurcation segment. We derived logistic regression equations for predicting the disease in different coronary bifurcations.

CONCLUSION: In LAD - D1, LCX – OM and RCA – PDA – PLV bifurcations lesser the BA, greater the PA, were more likely to develop significant lesion, which was not true in LMCA – LAD – LCX bifurcation.

Keywords

Bifurcation angle
proximal angle
Coronary artery disease

Fulltext Views
992

PDF downloads
656
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections