Translate this page into:
Gender-Specific Perspectives on National and Global Dyslipidemia Guidelines
*Corresponding author: Saeko Takahashi, Department of Cardiology, Shonan Oiso Hospital, Oiso, Japan. saeko@kamakuraheart.org
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
How to cite this article: Takahashi S, Matsukage T, Koh AS, Krishna SVVM, Nagasri Haritha P. Gender-Specific Perspectives on National and Global Dyslipidemia Guidelines. Indian J Cardiovasc Dis Women. 2025;10:340-7. doi: 10.25259/IJCDW_63_2025
Abstract
Dyslipidemia is a major contributor to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD), yet disparities in diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes between sexes and genders remain. Although low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol management targets differ slightly across guidelines, they are generally applied uniformly to both men and women, with evidence suggesting comparable therapeutic benefits. However, women tend to develop CVD later in life and widely used risk scores have limited validation in older adults, leaving uncertainty in risk estimation for older women. In younger women, recent guidelines have begun to incorporate female-specific risk enhancers, such as premature menopause, pregnancy complications, and autoimmune diseases, into cardiovascular risk assessment, though comprehensive guidance remains lacking. Across all guidelines, there is universal agreement that statins are generally contraindicated during pregnancy and lactation, with bile acid sequestrants and LDL apheresis recommended as alternative therapies in cases of severe familial hypercholesterolemia. Additional challenges more frequently observed in women include lower treatment adherence, higher rates of statin intolerance, and lifelong cardiovascular risk shaped by hormonal transitions, all of which require greater clinical attention. Future progress will depend on expanding sex-specific evidence, refining risk models, and implementing equitable treatment strategies. Incorporating a gender perspective into dyslipidemia management is essential for improving cardiovascular outcomes in women.
Keywords
Dyslipidemia
Gender
Guidelines
Sex difference
INTRODUCTION
Dyslipidemia is a cornerstone of cardiovascular risk. Statins, ezetimibe, and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors have revolutionized the prevention and treatment of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD), but outcomes remain unequal across sexes and genders. Epidemiological studies consistently demonstrate that women are less likely to be diagnosed and treated for dyslipidemia [1,2] and when treated, they are less likely to achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets.[3,4] Women also report statin intolerance more frequently, influencing adherence and persistence.[5] Moreover, lipid metabolism differs across the lifespan, with pregnancy,[6] menopause,[7,8] and hormone therapy all affecting lipid levels and cardiovascular risk.[9,10]
Clinical guidelines aim to harmonize practice, but the extent to which they address sex- and gender-specific differences varies considerably. Global guidelines provide broad principles, while national adaptations reflect local epidemiology, resources, and health system realities. This review compares major global and national dyslipidemia guidelines [Table 1], highlighting their gender-specific considerations and implications for practice.
| Guideline | LDL-C targets | Women-specific considerations |
|---|---|---|
| ESC/EAS (2019) | Very-high risk: <55 mg/dL (≥50% ↓≥5 High: <70 mg/dL (≥50% ↓≥5 Moderate: <100 mg/dL. Low: <116 mg/dL. | Pregnancy, planned conception, and breastfeeding=contraindications to statins. Bile-acid sequestrants or apheresis in severe FH. |
| AHA/ACC (2018–2019) | Primary prevention: ≥30% reduction (moderate-intensity statin), ≥50% reduction (high-intensity statin for higher risk). Secondary prevention: If LDL-C remains≥70 mg/dL on maximally tolerated statin, add ezetimibe; if still≥70 mg/dL in very-high-risk ASCVD, consider PCSK9 inhibitor. | Female-specific enhancers: premature menopause, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, preterm birth, preterm birth. Statins contraindicated in pregnancy; reliable contraception counseling required; discontinue 1–2 months before conception. |
| APSC (2022) | High risk: ≥50% ↓and<1.8 mmol/L. Very-high risk: ≥50% ↓and<1.4 mmol/L. | No explicit gender-or pregnancy-related recommendations. |
| Sociedad latinoamericana de cardiología intervencionista | — | No dedicated regional guideline; generally adopts ESC/AHA recommendations for both sexes. |
| Japan (Japan Atherosclerosis Society 2022) | Low risk (<2% 10-year ASCVD risk): LDL-C<160 mg/dL. Moderate risk (2–10% risk): LDL-C<140 mg/dL. High risk (>10% risk): LDL-C<120 mg/dL.Secondary prevention: LDL-C<70 mg/dL. | Sex is included in Hisayama risk model. Pregnancy: statins contraindicated; Bile-acid sequestrants or LDL apheresis for severe FH. Cascade FH screening emphasized, but underdiagnosis in women remains an issue. |
| India (RSSDI/LAI 2022) | RSSDI: High risk (diabetes, no ASCVD) <70–100 mg/dL. LAI: Very-high/secondary ASCVD<50 mg/dL; Extreme risk optional≤30 mg/dL. |
Women with type 2 diabetes automatically classified as high risk. Statins are contraindicated in pregnancy, breastfeeding, or without reliable contraception. Bile-acid sequestrants or LDL apheresis for FH. Trimester monitoring advised if treatment initiated. |
| UK (NICE 2023) | Primary prevention: ≥40% reduction in non-HDL-C from baseline, Secondary prevention: LDL-C ≤2.0 mmol/L (77 mg/dL) or non-HDL-C≤2.6 mmol/L | Targets apply equally to men and women. Data show women less likely to reach targets. Statins discontinued≥3 months before conception; contraindicated in pregnancy and breastfeeding. |
| Canada (Canadian Cardiovascular Society 2021) | Risk-stratified (Framingham-based). Secondary prevention: LDL-C<1.8 mmol/L (~70 mg/dL) or ≥50% reduction | Explicitly recognizes female-specific enhancers (preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, premature menopause). Recommends earlier statin initiation in women with such enhancers, even if risk otherwise modest. |
| Poland (Polish Lipid Association 2021) | Very high risk: LDL-C<55 mg/dL (≥50% reduction). High risk: LDL-C<70 mg/dL. Moderate risk: LDL-C<100 mg/dL. Low risk: LDL-C<115 mg/dL. | Comprehensive pregnancy/lactation guidance. Statins contraindicated; bile acid sequestrants safe. LDL apheresis is possible in HoFH. Strong focus on contraception, especially for women with FH. |
| USA (NLA Consensus 2024) | No unique LDL-C numeric targets; aligned with ACC/AHA. Focus on risk categories and treatment thresholds. | Dedicated to women of reproductive potential. Emphasizes risks of preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, and pancreatitis. Strong focus on lifestyle, shared decision-making, and preconception/pregnancy planning. |
| USA (American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Guidelines) | Extreme risk: <55 mg/dL, Very high risk: <70 mg/dL, High risk: <100 mg/dL Moderate risk: <130 mg/dL, Low risk: <160 mg/dL | Focuses on women in midlife/menopause and those with PCOS. Hormone therapy not for CVD prevention but may be used for symptoms. PCOS is recognized as a risk condition (elevated TG, low HDL-C). |
LDL-C: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HDL-C: High-density lipoprotein cholesterol, AHA: American Heart Association, ACC: American College of Cardiology, PCOS: Polycystic ovary syndrome, ASCVD: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, LAI: Lipid Association of India, RSSDI: Research Society for the Study of Diabetes in India, FH: Familial hypercholesterolemia, ESC: European Society of Cardiology, EAS: European Atherosclerosis Society, PCSK9: Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9, NLA: National lipid association, HoFH: Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia, TG: Triglycerides
GENDER CONSIDERATIONS GLOBAL GUIDELINES
European society of cardiology (ESC) and european atherosclerosis society (EAS) guidelines
The 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) guidelines used the original SCORE system for 10-year risk estimation. Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE2) and SCORE2-OP – sex-specific, competing-risk–adjusted models published in 2021 – were subsequently incorporated into ESC documents and are referenced in the 2025 focused update.[11,12] Routine lipid screening is recommended for men over 40 years and for women over 50 years or after menopause, acknowledging the protective effect of premenopausal status. Treatment thresholds and LDL-C targets are the same for both sexes. Statins are recommended for primary prevention in women at high risk and for secondary prevention under the same indications as in men. No sex-specific dosing adjustments are proposed, but the guidelines emphasize shared decision-making and careful management of perceived statin intolerance. To achieve these goals, the guidelines recommend highest-tolerated statin dose, adding ezetimibe if targets are not met, and considering PCSK9 inhibitors when combination therapy is insufficient. Lipid-lowering therapy should be avoided when pregnancy is planned, during pregnancy, and while breastfeeding. In severe familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), bile-acid sequestrants or LDL apheresis are possible alternatives. Recently, the 2025 ESC guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease (CVD) during pregnancy further emphasize a tailored, woman-centered approach, supporting women’s autonomy in making reproductive decisions in high-risk pregnancies.[13]
American heart association (AHA) and american college of cardiology (ACC) guidelines
The 2018 AHA/ACC cholesterol[14] and 2019 primary prevention[15] guidelines use the Pooled Cohort Equations, which incorporate sex as a core variable. Unlike the ESC/EAS approach, which sets absolute LDL-C targets, AHA/ACC emphasizes percentage reductions (30–50%) depending on baseline risk. Women-specific risk enhancers including premature menopause, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, preterm birth, and small-for-gestational-age delivery, are explicitly recognized and support earlier statin initiation in women at borderline risk. For secondary prevention, the guidelines recommend high-intensity statin therapy for all adults with established ASCVD, unless contraindicated. If LDL-C remains ≥70 mg/dL despite maximally tolerated statin therapy, ezetimibe is the next step, with PCSK9 inhibitors considered in very-high-risk patients when LDL-C goals are still not achieved. These treatment recommendations apply equally to women and men. Reproductive considerations are central to the guidance. Statins are contraindicated during pregnancy and lactation, and women planning pregnancy should discontinue statin therapy one to two months before conception. Counseling on reliable contraception is essential for women of childbearing potential who are prescribed statins, and therapy should be stopped immediately if pregnancy occurs.
Asian pacific society of cardiology consensus
The 2022 Asian Pacific Society of Cardiology (APSC) consensus[16] recommendations offer a unified framework for dyslipidemia management across the diverse Asia-Pacific region. The document emphasizes individualized assessment of cardiovascular risk, recognizing that epidemiology, resources, and healthcare access vary widely between countries. Rather than introducing novel sex-specific strategies, the consensus adopts a risk-based approach to LDL-C lowering that is closely aligned with international standards. High-intensity statins are first-line therapy for chronic coronary syndrome, with LDL-C reduction targets of ≥50% from baseline and <1.8 mmol/L, or <1.4 mmol/L for very-high-risk patients. Early addition of ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors is recommended if goals are not met. Regarding women, the consensus does not propose separate LDL-C thresholds or sex-specific dosing regimens. Instead, it reinforces principles consistent with other global guidelines. Lipid-lowering therapy should be avoided when pregnancy is planned, during pregnancy, and throughout breastfeeding. In situations of severe FH where treatment cannot be delayed, bile acid sequestrants or LDL apheresis may be considered alternatives. No further distinctions are made for female-specific risk modifiers such as premature menopause or pregnancy complications, which are increasingly highlighted in Western guidance.
Sociedad latinoamericana de cardiología intervencionista (SOLACI)
SOLACI does not issue independent dyslipidemia guidelines but disseminates and contextualizes international recommendations. Local practice generally adapts ESC/EAS and AHA/ACC thresholds to regional epidemiology and healthcare capacities. For women, SOLACI follows global recommendations, including avoidance of lipid-lowering therapy during pregnancy and lactation. However, it does not address female-specific risk enhancers such as pregnancy complications or premature menopause.[17]
GENDER CONSIDERATIONS NATIONAL GUIDELINES
Japan
The 2022 guidelines of the Japan Atherosclerosis Society (JAS)[18] are based on the Hisayama risk model, which incorporates sex as a variable. In Japan, women experience fewer acute myocardial infarctions than men, but cardiovascular mortality rises steeply after the age of 70. LDL-C thresholds are uniform for both men and women: <160 mg/dL for low risk, <140 mg/dL for moderate risk, and <100–120 mg/dL for high risk, with a target of <70 mg/dL for secondary prevention. Statins are contraindicated during pregnancy, with bile acid sequestrants or LDL apheresis as alternatives for severe FH. The Japan Atherosclerosis Society (JAS) guidelines emphasize the importance of screening and cascade testing for FH, though underdiagnosis in women remains a major challenge. Compared with Western standards, LDL-C targets are higher, reflecting Japan’s epidemiology where cancer, not CVD, is the leading cause of death in women.[19] As a result, Japan’s approach highlights the interplay between population-specific epidemiology, life expectancy, and public health priorities.
India
The 2022 guidelines from the Lipid Association of India and the Research Society for the Study of Diabetes in India[20] were developed in response to the country’s high burden of premature ASCVD. These recommendations reflect India’s unique epidemiological profile, characterized by earlier onset of disease and elevated cardiometabolic risk. Women with type 2 diabetes are automatically categorized as high risk, reflecting their disproportionate vulnerability to vascular complications. LDL-C targets are particularly aggressive: <50 mg/dL for very high-risk patients, with optional lowering to <30 mg/dL in extreme-risk cases such as FH with coronary disease. Statins are contraindicated in pregnancy, breastfeeding, and in women planning pregnancy without reliable contraception. For severe FH, bile acid sequestrants and LDL apheresis are recommended as safe alternatives. Given the absence of randomized trials in pregnancy, the guidelines avoid prescriptive thresholds for women but advise trimester-based lipid monitoring when therapy is initiated. Overall, India’s approach highlights an assertive strategy tailored to its distinctive epidemiology, with special emphasis on women with diabetes and FH.
The Indian Thyroid Society clearly integrates thyroid-related dyslipidemia and ASCVD risk assessment into lipid-management recommendations.[21] Women experience a unique overlap between thyroid dysfunction, dyslipidemia, and CVD risk throughout their lifespan. Thyroid disorders – particularly hypothyroidism – are significantly more common in women due to autoimmune predisposition and hormonal transitions during pregnancy, postpartum, and menopause. These life-stage changes intensify alterations in lipid metabolism, leading to higher LDL-C, triglycerides, Lp(a), and increases in small-dense and oxidized LDL particles. Notably, more than 90% of women with overt hypothyroidism exhibit hyperlipidemia, and 2–5% of those with subclinical hypothyroidism progress to overt disease each year. When Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) exceeds 10 mIU/L, cardiovascular risk increases substantially in women, supporting early initiation of levothyroxine therapy, followed by repeat lipid evaluation. Importantly, while the guideline emphasizes the need to reassess lipid profiles after achieving euthyroidism, it does not specify numerical lipid-control targets, instead referring clinicians to standard lipid-management guidelines for goal-setting. Normalizing thyroid function is particularly important before starting statins, as hypothyroidism heightens susceptibility to statin-associated myopathy. Given that Asian women often present with an atherogenic lipid phenotype and face earlier CVD onset compared with Western populations, routine thyroid screening and coordinated assessment of thyroid function and lipid profiles – especially around pregnancy and menopause – are essential strategies for cardiovascular prevention in women.
United Kingdom
The 2023 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines[22] take a pragmatic approach that differs from the fixed LDL-C thresholds widely used elsewhere. For primary prevention, the focus is on achieving at least a 40% reduction in non-High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) from baseline, rather than a set LDL target. For secondary prevention, stricter goals are specified: LDL-C ≤2.0 mmol/L (77 mg/dL) or non-HDL-C ≤2.6 mmol/L. These thresholds apply equally to men and women. Nonetheless, registry data consistently show that women with established CVD are less likely than men to achieve intensive lipid lowering. With respect to pregnancy, NICE advises discontinuing statins at least three months before conception and avoiding their use during breastfeeding.
Canada
The 2021 Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines[23] incorporate sex differences into cardiovascular risk assessment. Using a Framingham-based tool, they highlight female-specific risk enhancers including preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, and premature menopause, that warrant earlier initiation of statin therapy even when traditional risk estimates appear modest. Lipid screening is recommended for both men and women from age 40, with particular emphasis on women whose reproductive history places them at increased risk.
Poland
The 2021 Polish Lipid Association guidelines[24] provide one of the most detailed accounts of dyslipidemia management during pregnancy and lactation. They note the physiological rises in triglycerides, LDL-C, and lipoprotein(a) during pregnancy, all of which contribute to heightened obstetric risk. Statins should be discontinued at least three months before conception and are contraindicated during pregnancy and lactation, although in cases of severe homozygous FH, continuation may be considered under expert supervision. Bile acid sequestrants remain the only pharmacologic agents regarded as safe, with LDL apheresis available as an additional option. The guidelines also emphasize effective contraception, preferring low-estrogen oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices, or barrier methods, since high-estrogen formulations may adversely affect lipids. Women with FH are strongly advised to undergo preconception counseling, reflecting both maternal safety concerns and the high probability of transmitting FH to offspring. Poland’s framework highlights the importance of anticipating and managing reproductive implications in women with dyslipidemia.
United States
The National Lipid Association (NLA) has issued dedicated consensus guidance[25] for women of reproductive potential. It underscores the elevated risks of preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, and pancreatitis in women with dyslipidemia, while emphasizing shared decision-making, lifestyle optimization, and careful pharmacotherapy planning across preconception, pregnancy, and lactation. This document reflects a growing recognition that reproductive health and cardiovascular risk are closely linked for women, requiring proactive and individualized management strategies. The American Association of Clinical Endocrinology (AACE)[26] complements this perspective by focusing on women in midlife. Menopause is identified as a key transition point associated with an increasingly atherogenic lipid profile. Although hormone replacement therapy is not recommended for cardiovascular prevention, it may be considered for symptom management in selected cases. The guidelines also highlight polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), which is associated with elevated triglycerides and reduced HDL-C, and call for active lipid management in affected women. By addressing both menopause and PCOS, AACE underscores how hormonal transitions across the lifespan shape women’s cardiovascular risk and therapeutic needs.
WOMEN AND DYSLIPIDEMIA: CHALLENGES IN CURRENT GUIDELINES
What emerges from this review regarding gender-specific aspects of dyslipidemia management can be summarized as follows. First, although sex is incorporated into most cardiovascular risk scores, these tools do not always capture women’s cardiovascular risk in a comprehensive manner. Second, while LDL-C targets differ across guidelines, they are uniformly applied to both men and women. Third, the use of statins during pregnancy and lactation remains contraindicated. Finally, consensus on how to address female-specific risk enhancers is still lacking.
Current international dyslipidemia guidelines generally recommend uniform LDL-C thresholds for both sexes, with preventive strategies including statins, ezetimibe, and PCSK9 inhibitors guided by overall cardiovascular risk stratification. Although such consistency offers clarity, it may overlook important sex-specific nuances. In clinical practice, lipid screening typically begins later in women than in men, reflecting the protective effects of the premenopausal state. However, widely used risk calculators, such as the Pooled Cohort Equations in the United States and the SCORE system in Europe, are not validated beyond the age of 80. Given women’s longer average life expectancy, this limitation introduces uncertainty in evaluating cardiovascular risk in older women, who often bear a substantial lifetime burden of ASCVD.[27]
Reproductive considerations are consistently emphasized across guidelines. Statins remain contraindicated during pregnancy and lactation, and women planning pregnancy are advised to discontinue therapy in advance. In cases of severe FH, bile acid sequestrants or LDL apheresis represent relatively safe alternatives [Figure 1].

- Women-specific dyslipidemia management pathways. Current management strategies for reproductive-age women with dyslipidemia differ by pregnancy status, with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk guiding low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol targets in non-pregnant women, and statins avoided during pregnancy or breastfeeding in favor of bile acid sequestrants or LDL apheresis.
In July 2021, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requested the removal of the long-standing contraindication to statin use in women who are pregnant or contemplating pregnancy from all statin labels.[28,29] The 2023 AHA/ACC/American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP)/American Society for Preventive Cardiology (ASPC)/National Lipid Association (NLA)/Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association (PCNA) Guideline for Chronic Coronary Disease[30] acknowledges this change and states that in women with CCD at very high risk, continuation of statin therapy during pregnancy may be considered (Class 2b), although evidence remains limited. CCD is rare in pregnancy (<2–3.6%)[30-33] but associated with substantial maternal and fetal risks,[30,34,35] requiring coordinated care by a multidisciplinary cardio-obstetrics team.[36] Large observational studies, including a U.S. cohort of 886,996 pregnancies and several meta-analyses evaluating statin exposure during pregnancy,[37-39] have not shown an increased risk of congenital malformations after adjustment for confounders such as pre-existing diabetes. Although some reports have noted higher rates of miscarriage with statin exposure, these associations appear largely related to maternal comorbidities, and the FDA concluded that current evidence is insufficient to establish a causal link. Most contemporary guidelines have not yet fully adopted this shift and generally continue to recommend discontinuing statin therapy during pregnancy, with individualized consideration in select high-risk cases. To date, no evidence-based optimal LDL-C target during pregnancy has been established. Furthermore, the appropriate timing for initiating lipid-lowering therapy in pregnancy remains uncertain. In available studies, statin therapy has typically been initiated during the second trimester.[40,41] Among statin agents, pravastatin has been the most extensively studied in pregnant women; however, evidence supporting its efficacy and safety in this population remains limited.[29,40-42]
Life events and comorbidities disproportionately affecting women, such as premature menopause, pregnancy complications, thyroid disease, and autoimmune conditions including systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis, are increasingly recognized as risk-enhancing factors. Without systematic integration of these conditions, many women may be misclassified as having intermediate risk, which could delay the initiation of preventive therapy. Given these life-stage–related risk shifts, there is a critical need to establish age-stratified lipid management frameworks and evidence-based guidelines specifically for women.
CONCLUSION
While LDL-C targets and treatment strategies remain broadly consistent between men and women, current guidelines may not fully reflect the unique clinical needs of women, particularly in the context of longevity, reproductive transitions, and sex-specific comorbidities. Bridging these gaps could contribute to more equitable and effective ASCVD prevention globally.
Ethical approval:
Institutional Review Board approval is not required.
Declaration of patient consent:
Patient’s consent is not required as there are no patients in this study.
Conflicts of interest:
There are no conflicts of interest.
Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:
The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.
Financial support and Sponsorship: Nil.
References
- Sex Differences in the Use of Statins in Community Practice. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019;12:e005562.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gender Disparities in Utilization of Statins for Low Density Lipoprotein Management Across the Spectrum of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: Insights from the Houston Methodist Cardiovascular Disease Learning Health System Registry. Am J Prev Cardiol. 2024;19:100722.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Age-and Gender-Related Differences in LDL-Cholesterol Management in Outpatients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Int J Endocrinol. 2015;2015:957105.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sex Differences in LDL-C Control in a Primary Care Population: The PORTRAIT-DYS Study. Atherosclerosis. 2023;384:117148.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Prevalence of Statin Intolerance: A Meta-Analysis. Eur Heart J. 2022;43:3213-23.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dyslipidaemia Management in Pregnant Patients: A 2024 Update. Eur Heart J Open. 2024;4:oeae032.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Menopause Transition and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: Implications for Timing of Early Prevention: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020;142:e506-32.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Menopause and Women's Cardiovascular Health: Is It Really an Obvious Relationship? Arch Med Sci. 2022;19:458-66.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Effects of Postmenopausal Hormone Replacement Therapy on Lipid, Lipoprotein, and Apolipoprotein (a) Concentrations: Analysis of Studies Published from 1974-2000. Fertil Steril. 2001;75:898-915.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Effect of Hormone Replacement Therapy on Atherogenic Lipid Profile in Postmenopausal Women. Thromb Res. 2019;184:1-7.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias: Lipid Modification to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:111-88.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2025 Focused Update of the 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias. Eur Heart J. 2025;46:4359-78.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2025 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Cardiovascular Disease and Pregnancy. Eur Heart J. 2025;46:4462-8.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019;139:e1082-43.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- 2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74:e177-232.
- [Google Scholar]
- Asian Pacific Society of Cardiology Consensus Recommendations on Dyslipidaemia. Eur Cardiol. 2021;16:e54.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- New European Guidelines for Dyslipidemia Management: What is New? Available from: https://solaci.org/en/2020/01/31/new-european-guidelines-for-dyslipidemia-management-what-is-new [Last Accessed on 2025 Sep 21]
- [Google Scholar]
- Japan Atherosclerosis Society (JAS) Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2022. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2024;31:641-853.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cause of Death among Long-Term Cancer Survivors: The NANDE Study. Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11:835.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- RSSDI Consensus Recommendations for Dyslipidemia Management in Diabetes Mellitus. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries. 2022;42:3-28.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidemia and Thyroid Dysfunction. Available from: https://www.indianthyroidsociety.in/guidlines.php [Last accessed on 2025 Sep 26]
- [Google Scholar]
- Cardiovascular Disease: Risk Assessment and Reduction. 2023. Including Lipid Modification. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng238 [Last accessed on 2055 Sep 21]
- [Google Scholar]
- 2021 Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidemia for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Adults. Can J Cardiol. 2021;37:1129-50.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- PoLA/CFPiP/PCS/PSLD/PSD/PSH Guidelines on Diagnosis and Therapy of Lipid Disorders in Poland 2021. Arch Med Sci. 2021;17:1447-547.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dyslipidemia Management in Women of Reproductive Potential: An Expert Clinical Consensus from the National Lipid Association. J Clin Lipidol. 2024;18:e664-84.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Women's Health: Guidelines for Lipid-Lowering in Women - What Have we Learned? Available from: https://www.lipid.org/lipid-spin/spring-2020/women%e2%80%99s-health-guidelines-lipid-lowering-women-%e2%80%93-what-have-we-learned?utm_source=chatgpt.com [Last accessed on 2025 Sep 21]
- [Google Scholar]
- Cardiovascular Risk Factors Management in Older Adults: A Clinical Consensus Statement from the European Association of Preventive Cardiology of the ESC and the ESC Council for Cardiology Practice. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2025:zwaf175.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2021. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/safety/medical-product-safety-information/statins-drug-safety-communication-fda-requests-removal-strongest-warning-against-using-cholesterol [Last accessed on 2025 Oct 04]
- [Google Scholar]
- Statin Use in Pregnancy: Is It Time For a Paradigm Shift? Circulation. 2022;145:496-8.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients with Chronic Coronary Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2023;148:e9-119.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Outcome of Pregnancy in Patients with Structural or Ischaemic Heart Disease: Results of a Registry of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:657-65.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cardiovascular Care for Pregnant Women with Cardiovascular Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76:2102-13.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Long-Term Cardiovascular Outcomes after Pregnancy in Women with Heart Disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10:e020584.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pregnancy in Women with Pre-Existent Ischaemic Heart Disease: A Systematic Review with Individualised Patient Data. Heart. 2019;105:873-80.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Heart Disease: The CARPREG II Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:2419-30.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Team-Based Care of Women with Cardiovascular Disease from Pre-Conception through Pregnancy and Postpartum: JACC Focus Seminar 1/5. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77:1763-77.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Statins and Congenital Malformations: Cohort Study. BMJ. 2015;350:h1035.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The Fetal Safety of Statins: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014;36:506-9.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Statins during Pregnancy: A Cohort Study using the General Practice Research Database to Investigate Pregnancy Loss. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017;26:843-52.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pravastatin in Preeclampsia: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023;9:1076372.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Combined Use of Statin and PCSK9 Inhibitor in a Pregnant Woman with Possible Familial Hypercholesterolemia and Coronary Artery Stenosis. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2025;32:1464-9.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pravastatin to Prevent Obstetrical Complications in Women with Antiphospholipid Syndrome. J Clin Invest. 2016;126:2792-4.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
