Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstracts
Cardiovascular, Case Report
Cardiovascular, Commentary
Cardiovascular, Editorial
Cardiovascular, Guest Editorial
Cardiovascular, Images in Cardiology
Cardiovascular, Interventional Round
Cardiovascular, Original Article
Cardiovascular, Perspective Review
Cardiovascular, Preface
Cardiovascular, Review Article
Cardiovascular, Student’s Corner
Case Report
Case Report, Cardiovascular
Case Reports
Case Series, Cardiovascular
Clinical Discussion
Clinical Rounds
CPC
Current Issue
Debate
Dedication
Editorial
Editorial Cardiovascular
Editorial Comment, Cardiovascular
Editorial, From the Publisher’s Desk
Expert Comments
Expert's Opinion
Genetic Autopsy
Genetics Autopsy
Guest Editorial, Cardiovascular
Image in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology, Cardiovascular
Interventional Round
Interventional Round, Cardiovascular
Interventional Rounds
Invited Editorial Cardiovascular
Letter to Editor
Letter to Editor, Clinical Cardiology
Letter to the Editor
Media and news
Original Article
Original Article, ardiovascular
Original Article, Cardiovascular
Original Article, Cardiovascular Health
Perspective Review
Perspective Review, Cardiovascular
Point of View, Cardiovascular
Practice in Medicine
Preface
Review Article
Review Article, Cardiovascular
Scientific Paper
Short Communication
Student's Corner
Supplementary
Supplemetary
WINCARS Activities
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstracts
Cardiovascular, Case Report
Cardiovascular, Commentary
Cardiovascular, Editorial
Cardiovascular, Guest Editorial
Cardiovascular, Images in Cardiology
Cardiovascular, Interventional Round
Cardiovascular, Original Article
Cardiovascular, Perspective Review
Cardiovascular, Preface
Cardiovascular, Review Article
Cardiovascular, Student’s Corner
Case Report
Case Report, Cardiovascular
Case Reports
Case Series, Cardiovascular
Clinical Discussion
Clinical Rounds
CPC
Current Issue
Debate
Dedication
Editorial
Editorial Cardiovascular
Editorial Comment, Cardiovascular
Editorial, From the Publisher’s Desk
Expert Comments
Expert's Opinion
Genetic Autopsy
Genetics Autopsy
Guest Editorial, Cardiovascular
Image in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology, Cardiovascular
Interventional Round
Interventional Round, Cardiovascular
Interventional Rounds
Invited Editorial Cardiovascular
Letter to Editor
Letter to Editor, Clinical Cardiology
Letter to the Editor
Media and news
Original Article
Original Article, ardiovascular
Original Article, Cardiovascular
Original Article, Cardiovascular Health
Perspective Review
Perspective Review, Cardiovascular
Point of View, Cardiovascular
Practice in Medicine
Preface
Review Article
Review Article, Cardiovascular
Scientific Paper
Short Communication
Student's Corner
Supplementary
Supplemetary
WINCARS Activities
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstracts
Cardiovascular, Case Report
Cardiovascular, Commentary
Cardiovascular, Editorial
Cardiovascular, Guest Editorial
Cardiovascular, Images in Cardiology
Cardiovascular, Interventional Round
Cardiovascular, Original Article
Cardiovascular, Perspective Review
Cardiovascular, Preface
Cardiovascular, Review Article
Cardiovascular, Student’s Corner
Case Report
Case Report, Cardiovascular
Case Reports
Case Series, Cardiovascular
Clinical Discussion
Clinical Rounds
CPC
Current Issue
Debate
Dedication
Editorial
Editorial Cardiovascular
Editorial Comment, Cardiovascular
Editorial, From the Publisher’s Desk
Expert Comments
Expert's Opinion
Genetic Autopsy
Genetics Autopsy
Guest Editorial, Cardiovascular
Image in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology, Cardiovascular
Interventional Round
Interventional Round, Cardiovascular
Interventional Rounds
Invited Editorial Cardiovascular
Letter to Editor
Letter to Editor, Clinical Cardiology
Letter to the Editor
Media and news
Original Article
Original Article, ardiovascular
Original Article, Cardiovascular
Original Article, Cardiovascular Health
Perspective Review
Perspective Review, Cardiovascular
Point of View, Cardiovascular
Practice in Medicine
Preface
Review Article
Review Article, Cardiovascular
Scientific Paper
Short Communication
Student's Corner
Supplementary
Supplemetary
WINCARS Activities
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Review Article
Cardiovascular
10 (
4
); 367-375
doi:
10.25259/IJCDW_60_2025

Dyslipidemia in Women with Autoimmune Diseases: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Rheumatoid Arthritis, and Beyond

Department of Cardiology, Maharaja Krushna Chandra Gajapati Medical College and Hospital, Berhampur, Odisha, India.
Department of General Medicine, Saheed Laxman Nayak Medical College and Hospital, Koraput, Odisha, India.
Department of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products Cell Therapy and Transnational Medicine, Global Health, Infectious Diseases, Berlin, Germany,
Department of Cardiology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Cardiology, Patna, Bihar, India.

*Corresponding author: Biraja Prasad Beura, Department of Cardiology , Maharaja Krushna Chandra Gajapati Medical College and Hospital, Berhampur, Odisha, India. kunalbirajak@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Satpathy C, Mohanty N, Parida SK, Selvabharathi A, Beura BP. Dyslipidemia in Women with Autoimmune Diseases: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Rheumatoid Arthritis, and Beyond. Indian J Cardiovasc Dis Women. 2025;10:367-75. doi: 10.25259/IJCDW_60_2025

Abstract

Women with autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and others face a disproportionate burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD), in part due to inflammation-driven dyslipidemia. Unlike classical metabolic dyslipidemia, these lipid abnormalities are characterized by low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, elevated triglycerides, dysfunctional HDL, and increased oxidized low-density lipoprotein. The interplay of chronic inflammation, immune dysregulation, hormonal factors, and treatment-related effects contributes to a unique lipid phenotype that amplifies CVD risk in women. This narrative review explores the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical manifestations of dyslipidemia in SLE and RA, with an extension to other autoimmune diseases such as psoriatic arthritis, Sjögren’s syndrome, systemic sclerosis, and autoimmune thyroid disorders. Management strategies, including early screening, inflammation control, statin therapy, and gender-specific considerations, are highlighted. The article underscores the urgent need for tailored risk assessment tools and therapeutic approaches to mitigate premature cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in this vulnerable population.

Keywords

Autoimmune diseases
Cardiovascular risk
Dyslipidemia
Rheumatoid arthritis
Systemic lupus erythematosus
Women

INTRODUCTION

Dyslipidemia is a major modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), the leading cause of mortality worldwide. Women with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs), particularly systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), exhibit a disproportionately higher risk of premature atherosclerotic CVD compared with the general population. Epidemiological studies have demonstrated that young women with SLE have up to a 50-fold increased risk of myocardial infarction compared with age-matched controls.[1,2] Similarly, women with RA experience a two-fold greater risk of CVD than the general female population.[3]

The mechanisms underlying this increased burden extend beyond traditional risk factors and are largely driven by disease-related chronic inflammation, immune dysregulation, and medication-related effects. In addition, hormonal influences and the higher prevalence of these diseases in women add complexity to lipid metabolism. The resulting lipid abnormalities differ from classical metabolic dyslipidemia and are characterized by qualitative and functional disturbances that contribute to atherosclerosis even when absolute lipid levels appear normal or low. Despite advances in immunomodulatory therapy, cardiovascular (CV) events remain the leading cause of death in women with autoimmune diseases.

This review summarizes the current evidence on dyslipidemia in women with autoimmune diseases, focusing on SLE and RA, and extending the discussion to other conditions such as psoriatic arthritis (PsA), Sjögren’s syndrome, systemic sclerosis (SSc), and autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD). We also highlight clinical implications, screening strategies, and management approaches tailored to this population.

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF DYSLIPIDEMIA IN AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES

Dyslipidemia in autoimmune diseases represents a distinct entity from conventional metabolic dyslipidemia. Rather than being driven solely by lifestyle or metabolic syndrome, lipid abnormalities in SLE, RA, and other ARDs are largely a consequence of chronic inflammation, autoimmunity, and treatment-related factors. These processes result in both quantitative changes (altered lipid levels) and qualitative changes (lipid particle dysfunction), producing a pro-atherogenic milieu that underlies the excess CV risk in this population.

Inflammation-driven lipid alterations

Pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-6, and type I interferons profoundly affect lipid metabolism. TNF-α and IL-6 upregulate hepatic very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) production while simultaneously inhibiting lipoprotein lipase activity, leading to hypertriglyceridemia. IL-6 also accelerates hepatic clearance of total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), often resulting in paradoxically low levels during active inflammation. Despite these apparently favorable lipid concentrations, the risk of atherosclerosis is heightened, a phenomenon termed the “lipid paradox” in RA.[4] In addition, systemic inflammation promotes oxidative modification of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles, creating oxidized LDL (oxLDL), which is more atherogenic due to enhanced uptake by macrophages and stimulation of endothelial dysfunction [Figure 1].

Effect of inflammation in autoimmune diseases. (TNF: Tumor necrosis factor, IL: Interleukin, VLDL: Very low density lipoprotein, LPL: Lipoprotein lipase.)
Figure 1:
Effect of inflammation in autoimmune diseases. (TNF: Tumor necrosis factor, IL: Interleukin, VLDL: Very low density lipoprotein, LPL: Lipoprotein lipase.)

Autoantibody-mediated mechanisms

High-density lipoprotein (HDL) normally exerts anti-atherogenic effects by facilitating reverse cholesterol transport and exerting anti-inflammatory and antioxidant actions. In SLE, however, the presence of autoantibodies against apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1) and HDL leads to structural and functional impairment, converting HDL into a pro-inflammatory HDL particle. This dysfunctional HDL loses its protective capacity and instead promotes oxidative stress within the vasculature.[5,6] Similar phenomena are described in RA and Sjögren’s syndrome, where HDL exhibits reduced paraoxonase-1 activity, impairing its antioxidant function.[7-9]

Hormonal and gender-specific influences

An increasing number of studies have explored the role of sex on the immune system, and there is a considerable amount of evidence in the literature suggesting that estrogens play a significant part in autoimmunity.[10] Sex hormones modulate lipid metabolism. Estrogen typically raises HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) and lowers LDL-C, contributing to the lower CV risk in premenopausal women. In autoimmune diseases, however, chronic systemic inflammation blunts estrogen’s protective effects, while premature menopause, common in SLE and RA due to both disease activity and cytotoxic therapies, accelerates adverse lipid changes.[11] Menopause can induce the development of autoimmunity and can alter the course of immune-rheumatic diseases.[12] This interaction explains, in part, why women with ARDs lose their expected hormonal CV protection and exhibit disproportionately high atherosclerotic risk.

Therapy-related factors

Medications significantly modulate lipid profiles in autoimmune diseases.

  • Glucocorticoids: Commonly used in SLE and RA, increase LDL-C and triglycerides (TGs) in a dose-dependent manner while lowering HDL-C at higher doses.

  • Hydroxychloroquine: Improves lipid profiles by lowering LDL and TG s while raising HDL.

  • Methotrexate: Exerts indirect cardioprotective effects via inflammation reduction.

  • Biologic agents (TNF inhibitors, IL-6 blockers): May raise TC and LDL-C but also improve HDL function and reduce vascular inflammation, resulting in net CV benefit.

DYSLIPIDEMIA IN SLE

Epidemiology

Among traditional atherosclerotic risk factors, dyslipidemia is believed to decisively affect the long-term prognosis of lupus patients with regard to CV events Dyslipidemia is highly prevalent in SLE, affecting up to 30–60% of patients.[13]

Characteristic lipid profile

The “lupus pattern” of dyslipidemia includes:

  • Low HDL-C

  • Elevated TGs

  • Elevated oxLDL

  • Normal or slightly increased TC and LDL-C

  • Altered apolipoproteins: Reduced ApoA1 (HDL’s main protein component) and elevated ApoB are frequently observed.

Disease activity and lipid changes

Active disease exacerbates lipid abnormalities through enhanced cytokine release. During remission, partial improvement in lipid levels is observed, though abnormalities often persist.[14]

CV outcomes

With regard to the impact of dyslipidemia on clinical CVD, several studies have shown that increased TC is an independent predictor for CV events, including myocardial infarction and stroke[1,15-18] as well as subclinical atherosclerosis. The dyslipidemia in SLE, combined with chronic inflammation and traditional risk factors, contributes significantly to this burden, necessitating vigilant monitoring and aggressive risk management. Importantly, CV events often occur despite “normal” lipid levels, reflecting the impact of dysfunctional HDL and oxLDL.

Renal outcomes

Dyslipidemia in patients with SLE can alter the course of disease severity majority of patients with SLE have renal involvement. There is mounting evidence that dyslipidemia can, in fact, aggravate renal injury. The levels of TNF receptors are increased in patients with SLE nephritis. Hyperlipidemia may interact with these TNF receptors and aggravate renal damage.

DYSLIPIDEMIA IN RA

Epidemiology

Dyslipidemia is common in RA, affecting nearly 50% of patients during the disease course. The CV research in Rheumatoid patients study reported a two-fold increase in CV events among RA patients compared with the general population, despite lower LDL-C concentrations.[19] Large registries such as Quantitative Patient Questionnaires in standard monitoring of patients with Rheumatoid arthritis (QUEST)-RA and population-based cohorts confirm this elevated risk.[20] While conventional risk factors contribute, RA-specific lipid changes and inflammation-driven alterations explain much of the residual CV burden. The association between CVD and RA was greater in females and younger individuals.[21] Studies suggest that female RA patients have lower HDL-C and more adverse lipid ratios compared with men. Furthermore, post-menopausal women with RA exhibit accelerated atherogenesis due to the combined loss of estrogen’s cardioprotective effects and heightened systemic inflammation.

The “lipid paradox”

One of the most striking features of RA-associated dyslipidemia is the so-called “lipid paradox.” Unlike classic dyslipidemia, where higher TC and LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) strongly predict CVD, RA patients often exhibit low TC, LDL-C, and HDL-C levels during periods of high disease activity—yet their CV risk is paradoxically elevated. This paradox is explained by:

  • Inflammation-induced lipid lowering: Pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-6 accelerate LDL clearance and reduce cholesterol synthesis, resulting in lower circulating lipid levels.

  • Qualitative lipid dysfunction: Despite reduced absolute concentrations, LDL particles are more atherogenic (small, dense, oxidized), while HDL becomes dysfunctional, losing its antioxidant and reverse cholesterol transport capacity.

  • Inflammation as the true driver: CVD risk is closely linked to systemic inflammation rather than absolute lipid levels, explaining why lowering inflammation often normalizes lipids while simultaneously reducing risk.

Gender differences

Female RA patients display more adverse lipid profiles, including lower HDL-C and more dysfunctional HDL compared with male patients. Menopause compounds this effect.

CV risk

The paradoxical association of low cholesterol with higher CV risk underscores the centrality of inflammation. Effective suppression of RA activity improves both lipid levels and outcomes, emphasizing the need for integrated management. The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommends multiplying standard CVD risk scores by 1.5 in RA patients with additional risk factors.[22]

DYSLIPIDEMIA IN OTHER AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES

Psoriasis and PsA

The inflammatory milieu in psoriasis and PsA exerts profound effects on lipid homeostasis. Pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-17 disrupt normal lipid metabolism, leading to an atherogenic lipid profile.

Patients with psoriasis and PsA often have elevated TGs, low HDL-C, and increased LDL-C. The overlap with metabolic syndrome is strong.[23] The severity and duration of psoriasis correlate with the degree of lipid abnormalities, suggesting that sustained systemic inflammation amplifies metabolic dysregulation.

Sjögren’s syndrome

Dyslipidemia in Sjögren’s syndrome represents an important but often underrecognized contributor to CVD. Driven by chronic inflammation, immune dysregulation, and oxidative stress, lipid abnormalities in Sjögren’s syndrome extend beyond quantitative changes to involve functional alterations that accelerate atherosclerosis. Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and endothelial dysfunction have been observed in Sjögren’s syndrome patients, often independent of traditional CV risk factors.[24] Compared with RA or SLE, the CV risk in Sjögren’s syndrome is less extensively studied, but emerging evidence highlights a similar pattern of premature vascular aging and subclinical atherosclerosis.

SSc

Dyslipidemia in SSc arises from a complex interplay of systemic inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and metabolic disturbances. Patients with SSc exhibit increased rates of subclinical atherosclerosis, as reflected by cIMT, impaired flow-mediated vasodilation, and arterial stiffness. Dyslipidemia acts synergistically with immune-mediated endothelial injury, Raynaud’s phenomenon-related vascular stress, and microangiopathy to accelerate atherothrombosis. Consequently, SSc patients are at higher risk for ischemic heart disease, CVD, and CV mortality compared with the general population. While pulmonary arterial hypertension and myocardial fibrosis dominate clinical attention, dyslipidemia represents a modifiable contributor to CV risk that should not be overlooked. Disease duration, diffuse cutaneous subtype, and systemic involvement (particularly interstitial lung disease and renal dysfunction) are associated with more pronounced dyslipidemia. Compared to SLE or RA, the literature on dyslipidemia in SSc is relatively limited, yet available data indicate a similarly heightened cardiometabolic burden.

AITDs

AITDs, including Hashimoto’s thyroiditis and Graves’ disease, are characterized by immune-mediated thyroid dysfunction, manifesting as hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, or fluctuating thyroid states. Beyond the endocrine manifestations, AITD is increasingly recognized as a systemic condition associated with metabolic derangements, particularly dyslipidemia. The thyroid gland plays a central role in lipid metabolism by regulating cholesterol synthesis, clearance, and lipoprotein activity. In hypothyroidism due to Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, reduced thyroid hormone levels impair LDL receptor activity in the liver, slowing LDL clearance and raising circulating cholesterol. Lipoprotein lipase activity is also reduced, leading to elevated TGs. Furthermore, oxidative stress and systemic inflammation inherent to autoimmunity modify lipoproteins, producing oxLDL and dysfunctional HDL, which exacerbate atherogenesis. In contrast, hyperthyroidism (often due to Graves’ disease) accelerates LDL clearance, typically resulting in hypocholesterolemia, though chronic inflammation and treatment-induced hypothyroidism may paradoxically contribute to dyslipidemia. Various patterns of lipid abnormalities in autoimmune diseases described above are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1: Typical lipid profiles across autoimmune diseases.
Disease Key lipid abnormalities Notes
SLE ↓HDL-C, ↑TG, ↑oxLDL, normal/low LDL-C Lupus pattern; dysfunctional HDL
RA ↓HDL-C, ↓TC/LDL-C (active disease), ↑oxLDL Lipid paradox; inflammation-driven
Psoriasis/PsA ↑TG, ↓HDL-C, ↑LDL-C Overlap with metabolic syndrome
Sjögren’s syndrome ↓HDL-C, dysfunctional HDL, ↑oxLDL Subclinical atherosclerosis, ↑cIMT
SSc ↑LDL-C, ↓HDL-C Endothelial dysfunction, vascular stiffness
AITD (Hypothyroid) ↑LDL-C, ↑TG ↓LDL clearance
AITD (Hyperthyroid) ↓TC, ↓LDL-C Chronic inflammation and treatment-induced hypothyroidism

SLE: Systemic lupus erythematosus, RA: Rheumatoid arthritis, PsA: Psoriatic arthritis, SjS: Sjögren’s syndrome, SSc: Systemic sclerosis, AITD: Autoimmune thyroid disease, HDL-C: High-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, TC: Total cholesterol, TG: Triglycerides, oxLDL: Oxidized low-density lipoprotein, cIMT: Carotid intima-media thickness, ↓: Decrease, ↑: Increase

MANAGEMENT OF DYSLIPIDEMIA IN AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES

The management of dyslipidemia in autoimmune diseases requires a multifaceted approach that addresses both traditional CV risk factors and disease-specific mechanisms. Unlike conventional metabolic dyslipidemia, lipid abnormalities in SLE, RA, and related disorders are largely inflammation-driven and qualitatively distinct. As such, management must combine aggressive control of systemic inflammation with evidence-based lipid-lowering strategies, while considering gender-specific and reproductive issues in predominantly female patients.

Screening and risk assessment

Regular lipid screening is recommended in all patients with autoimmune diseases, particularly women with active disease or those receiving corticosteroids. EULAR guidelines advise baseline lipid profiling at diagnosis and periodically.[25] Conventional CV risk calculators (e.g., Framingham, systematic coronary risk evaluation [SCORE], atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease [ASCVD]) underestimate risk in autoimmune populations. EULAR recommends multiplying calculated risk scores by 1.5 in RA if additional risk factors (disease duration >10 years, seropositivity, extra-articular disease) are present. Similar adjustments are likely necessary in SLE, although no validated formula currently exists.

Lifestyle interventions

Lifestyle modification is a cornerstone of management. Interventions include:

  • Dietary changes: Mediterranean-style diet rich in omega-3 fatty acids, fiber, and antioxidants.

  • Physical activity: Regular aerobic and resistance exercise, adapted to joint function and fatigue levels.

  • Smoking cessation: Critical in RA and SLE, where smoking exacerbates both inflammation and CVD risk.

  • Weight management: Essential in PsA and other conditions closely linked to metabolic syndrome.

Control of systemic inflammation

Inflammation control is central to correcting lipid abnormalities.

  • Glucocorticoids improve disease activity but worsen lipid profiles; the lowest effective dose should be used.

  • Hydroxychloroquine (in SLE) improves lipid parameters by lowering LDL-C and TGs, and increasing HDL-C, making it both disease-modifying and cardioprotective.

  • Methotrexate in RA has indirect cardioprotective benefits through inflammation suppression.

  • Biologic agents (TNF inhibitors, IL-6 receptor blockers, rituximab) improve lipid function and vascular inflammation despite sometimes raising TC. Net effect is CV risk reduction.

Pharmacologic lipid-lowering therapy

Statins remain the mainstay of therapy. They effectively reduce LDL-C and TGs while modestly increasing HDL-C. Beyond lipid-lowering, statins may exert anti-inflammatory effects, potentially improving endothelial function in autoimmune diseases. Many autoimmune patients have normal LDL-C but elevated C reactive protein (CRP)/high sensitive C reactive protein (hs-CRP). Justification for the use of statins in prevention: an intervention trial evaluating rosuvastatin (JUPITER) proved that rosuvastatin reduces CV events in patients with normal LDL but elevated hsCRP, confirming the inflammation–atherosclerosis link and providing rationale for statin therapy in these patients, even in the absence of overt hyperlipidemia.[26]

Lupus Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (LAPS) trial tested atorvastatin 40 mg daily versus placebo over 2 years in 200 SLE patients without clinical CVD, showed atorvastatin significantly lowered LDL in SLE but did not reduce subclinical atherosclerosis progression over 2 years, underscoring that lupus-related vascular risk extends beyond cholesterol. LAPS suggests that statins alone may not fully prevent lupus-related vascular damage, highlighting the need for comprehensive risk management (tight disease control, steroid minimization, control of blood pressure,and diabetes).[27]

The atherosclerosis prevention in pediatric lupus erythematosus (APPLE) trial found that atorvastatin safely lowered LDL-C in pediatric SLE but did not reduce cIMT progression overall. Statins should be considered in pediatric SLE patients with dyslipidemia or other strong CV risk factors.[28]

The trial of atorvastatin in rheumatoid arthritis (TARA) trial demonstrated that atorvastatin can improve both lipid parameters and markers of systemic inflammation in RA. Importantly, atorvastatin also led to modest improvements in disease activity, suggesting a dual CV and anti-rheumatic benefit. The magnitude of disease activity score (DAS)28 reduction was smaller than that typically achieved with Disease Modifying anti Rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or biologics, but clinically meaningful given statins’ safety, low cost, and widespread availability.[29]

Trial of atorvastatin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events (TRACE) RA confirmed that atorvastatin significantly improves lipid levels in RA and showed a non-significant trend toward CV event reduction. It could not prove a definitive reduction in CV outcomes since the trial was underpowered (early termination after fewer-than-expected events). Importantly, the trial demonstrated the safety of high-dose atorvastatin in RA, supporting broader use in high-risk patients.[30]

  • Ezetimibe can be added if statin monotherapy is insufficient or not tolerated.

  • Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors offer potent LDL-C reduction in high-risk patients, though data in autoimmune diseases are limited.

  • Fibrates may be considered for severe hypertriglyceridemia, particularly in lupus patients on corticosteroids [Table 2].

Table 2: Effects of commonly used drugs on lipid profiles.
Drug Lipid effect CV impact
Glucocorticoids ↑LDL-C, ↑TGs, ↓HDL-C (dose-dependent) Long-term use worsens CV risk.
Hydroxychloroquine ↓LDL-C, ↓TGs, ↑HDL-C. Improves lipid profile; provides cardioprotective benefit in SLE.
Methotrexate Neutral effect on lipid levels. Indirect cardioprotective effect via inflammation suppression.
TNF inhibitors ↑total cholesterol and LDL-C, improved HDL function. Despite lipid rise, net effect is CV benefit.
IL-6 blockers ↑total cholesterol and LDL-C, improved HDL quality. Reduce vascular inflammation, overall protective
Statins ↓LDL-C, ↓TGs, modest↑HDL-C Strong lipid-lowering plus anti-inflammatory benefit.
PCSK9 inhibitors Potent↓LDL-C. Limited data on autoimmune diseases
Ezetimibe ↓LDL-C, ↓total cholesterol, mild↑HDL-C Can be added if statin monotherapy is insufficient or not tolerated.
Fibrates Significant↑HDL-C, Neutral/slight↓LDL-C May be considered for severe hypertriglyceridemia, particularly in lupus patients on corticosteroids
Bempedoic acid ↓LDL-C, ↓total cholesterol Can be added if statin monotherapy is insufficient or not tolerated.

LDL-C: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HDL-C: High-density lipoprotein cholesterol, TG: Triglycerides, SLE: Systemic lupus erythematosus, TNF: Tumor necrosis factor, IL-6: Interleukin-6, PCSK9: Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9, CV: Cardiovascular. ↓: Decrease, ↑: Increase

Gender and pregnancy considerations

The American College of cardiology (ACC)/American heart association (AHA) guidelines recommend the consideration of “RISK ENHANCERS” including female-specific factors such as pregnancy outcomes (e.g., Preeclampsia), polycystic ovarian disease (PCOD), premature menopause, and autoimmune/inflammatory diseases (such as SLE and RA). The presence of this risk-enhancing factors would reclassify women into a higher risk group and favor the initiation of statin therapy or intensification of therapy, particularly for borderline risk groups for whom there may be more uncertainty about actual CVD risk. In such cases of uncertainty, a coronary artery calcium (CAC) score based on non-contrast computed tomography (CT) can help refine risk estimates and guide decision-making for the need for pharmacological intervention. Statin therapy is recommended for CAC score ≥ 100 Agatston units or at or above ≥75th age-sex percentile. Management of women of reproductive age requires special attention. Statins and PCSK9 inhibitors are contraindicated in pregnancy due to teratogenic risk. Hydroxychloroquine, in contrast, is safe and should be continued throughout pregnancy. For women planning conception, discontinuation of statins with transition to non-teratogenic options (diet, lifestyle, possibly bile acid sequestrants) is recommended. Post-menopausal women often require more intensive lipid-lowering therapy due to the loss of estrogen’s protective effects.

Integrated multidisciplinary care

The management of dyslipidemia in autoimmune diseases is distinct from that in the general population. It requires a dual focus on suppressing systemic inflammation and implementing evidence-based lipid-lowering strategies, tailored to the unique risks faced by predominantly female patients. Optimal management requires collaboration among rheumatologists, cardiologists, and primary care physicians. Comprehensive strategies should integrate disease control, CV risk stratification, and reproductive counseling. Patient education is crucial to improve adherence, particularly since asymptomatic dyslipidemia may be overshadowed by active autoimmune disease manifestations. Future directions include the use of PCSK9 inhibitors and development of autoimmune-specific CV risk calculators to guide therapy more precisely.

INDIAN EVIDENCES

SLE (mostly young women) → high dyslipidemia burden

An Eastern India prospective cohort (n = 101; 96% female; mean age 27) found dyslipidemia in 57.4%: hypertriglyceridemia 54.4%, low HDL and higher LDL versus controls; steroids did ot significantly change the pattern in this dataset.[31]

“Lupus pattern” echoes in Indian cohorts

Elevated TG/VLDL with low HDL predominates in active disease; Indian data mirror this phenotype versus matched controls.[31]

Subclinical atherosclerosis is common

Indian SLE and RA cohorts show increased cIMT versus controls; older Indian studies and a 2023 East-India SLE paper support higher CIMT/plaque burden in these patients.[32,33]

RA in India → frequent low HDL and dyslipidemia

Indian RA series report dyslipidemia with low HDL as the most common abnormality; disease activity correlates inversely with HDL. Early Indian data (Hadda et al.) and newer Indian RA cohorts (Telangana; 2024–2025) reinforce this and show higher CIMT tied to age/disease activity.[34,35]

INDIAN GUIDELINE SIGNALS YOU CAN APPLY

Lipid Association of India (LAI) 2023/2024 update

Recognizes high ASCVD risk in Indians and supports aggressive LDL-C lowering (statin ± ezetimibe; early re-testing at 2 weeks for intensification). These principles are applicable to patients with chronic inflammatory diseases like RA/SLE, where calculated risk may underestimate true risk.[36]

PRACTICAL TAKEAWAYS FOR INDIAN WOMEN WITH AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES

Screen early and repeatedly

Fasting lipid panel at diagnosis, after disease control, and at 3–6 months post-therapy changes; then annually (more often if active disease or therapy changes). Under-testing misses risk in RA/SLE.

Aim low on LDL-C

Treat RA/SLE patients as at least “risk-enhanced” in many, manage like high-risk Indians as per LAI: Start moderate–high intensity statin; add ezetimibe if not at goal; consider PCSK9 when available/affordable for very-high risk.

Check subclinical atherosclerosis where risk feels “under-called”

CIMT/carotid plaque can reclassify risk when calculators look “normal” but disease is active/long-standing or other enhancers exist.[37,38]

Mind disease activity and steroids

Active SLE/RA worsens TG/HDL; optimize disease modifying anti rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and steroid-sparing regimens to improve the lipid pattern. Indian SLE data did not find a clear steroid signal in that cohort, but overall literature supports activity-linked dyslipidemia.

Women’s health specifics

  • Pregnancy: Coordinate obstetric-rheumatology care; avoid statins in pregnancy; address TG surges.

  • Vitamin D/HDL interplay in RA: Indian data note low HDL with Vitamin D deficiency and higher disease activity—address deficiencies.[39]

CONCLUSION

Dyslipidemia in women with autoimmune diseases represents a distinct clinical entity characterized by inflammation-driven qualitative lipid abnormalities that substantially increase CVD risk. SLE and RA demonstrate the most profound effects, with women disproportionately affected due to both disease prevalence and hormonal interactions. Effective management requires integrated strategies: aggressive control of systemic inflammation, regular lipid monitoring, judicious use of lipid-lowering agents, and individualized reproductive health considerations. Statins and hydroxychloroquine form the therapeutic backbone, with biologics offering indirect benefit through inflammation control. Future research should prioritize the need for large, well-designed randomized trials with long-term follow-up, enriched for high-risk patients, and powered for clinical endpoints rather than surrogates. Trials of newer lipid-lowering agents – such as PCSK9 inhibitors, bempedoic acid, and RNA-based therapies – should specifically evaluate efficacy and safety in autoimmune populations. Furthermore, integrated strategies that combine intensive immunomodulation with lipid-lowering may better address the dual drivers of autoimmune atherosclerosis. Translational research into biomarkers such as oxLDL, anti-apoA1 antibodies, and HDL functionality could refine risk stratification and personalize therapy.

Ethical approval:

Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent:

Patient’s consent not required as there are no patients in this study.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. , , , , , , et al. Age-Specific Incidence Rates of Myocardial Infarction and Angina in Women with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Comparison with the Framingham Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;145:408-15.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . The Epidemiology of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease among Patients with SLE: A Systematic Review. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2013;43:77-95.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , . Risk of Incident Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71:1524-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , et al. Lipid Paradox in Rheumatoid Arthritis: The Impact of Serum Lipid Measures and Systemic Inflammation on the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:482-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , et al. Anti-Apolipoprotein A-1 Autoantibodies Correlate with Disease Activity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020;59:534-44.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , . High-Density Lipoprotein in Lupus: Disease Biomarkers and Potential Therapeutic Strategy. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020;72:20-30.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , . Decreased Human Paraoxonase-1 Activity in Patients with Sjögren's Syndrome. Int Immunol. 2010;22:605-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , et al. Association between Paraoxonase/Arylesterase Activity of Serum PON-1 Enzyme and Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Antioxidants (Basel). 2022;11:2317.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , . Paraoxonase-1 Enzyme Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: Association with Carotid Intima-Media Thickness? Menoufia Med J. 2020;33:82-8.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. . Sex Hormones in Acquired Immunity and Autoimmune Disease. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2279.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , et al. Premature Ovarian Failure in Patients Affected by Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Cross-Sectional Study. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2020;38:450-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , . The Impact of Menopause on Autoimmune and Rheumatic Diseases. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2025;68:32.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , . Dyslipidemia in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Immunol Res. 2017;65:543-50.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , et al. Serum Lipid Profile in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Front Immunol. 2025;15:1503434.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , et al. Predictors of Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015;2(2):1435-41.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , . Importance of Cumulative Exposure to Elevated Cholesterol and Blood Pressure in Development of Atherosclerotic Coronary Artery Disease in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Prospective Proof-of-Concept Cohort Study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13:R156.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , . Vascular Events in Hypertensive Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Lupus. 2000;9:672-5.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , . Ability of Non-Fasting and Fasting Triglycerides to Predict Coronary Artery Disease in Lupus Patients. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012;51:528-34.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , , et al. In RA Patients without Prevalent CVD, Incident CVD is Mainly Associated with Traditional Risk Factors: A 20-Year Follow-Up in the CARRÉ Cohort Study. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2023;58:152132.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , , et al. Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results from the QUEST-RA Study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2008;10:R30.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , , et al. Associations between Cardiovascular Outcomes and Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study. J Clin Med. 2022;11:6812.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , , et al. EULAR Recommendations for Cardiovascular Disease Risk Management in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Other Forms of Inflammatory Joint Disorders: 2015/2016 Update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:17-28.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , , . Increased Prevalence of the Metabolic Syndrome in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2010;8:331-4.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , , . Primary Sjögren's Syndrome as Independent Risk Factor for Subclinical Atherosclerosis. Eur J Rheumatol. 2022;9:20-5.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , , , et al. EULAR Recommendations for Cardiovascular Risk Management in Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases, Including Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Antiphospholipid Syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022;81:768-79.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , , , et al. Rosuvastatin to Prevent Vascular Events in Men and Women with Elevated C-Reactive Protein. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2195-207.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , , . Lupus Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (LAPS) Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:760-5.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , , , , et al. Use of Atorvastatin in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Children and Adolescents. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:285-96.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. , , , , , , et al. Trial of Atorvastatin in Rheumatoid Arthritis (TARA): Double-Blind, Randomised Placebo-Controlled Trial. Lancet. 2004;363:2015-21.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. , , , , , , et al. A Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Atorvastatin for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71:1437-49.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. , , , . Lipid Profile in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Study from a Tertiary Teaching Hospital of Eastern India. Int J Res Med Sci. 2017;5:4749-53.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. , , , , , , et al. Atherosclerosis in Asian Indians with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Scand J Rheumatol. 2006;35:128-32.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. , , , , , . Carotid Intima Media Thickness as a Marker of Atherosclerotic Burden in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Cross-sectional Study from a Tertiary Care Centre of Eastern India. J Clin of Diagn Res. 2023;17:OC26-31.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. , , , , , . Disease Activity and Lipids in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Prospective Study. Indian J Rheumatol. 2007;2:137-40.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. , . Study of Dyslipidemia and Cardiovascular Risk in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in Telangana Population. Int J Acad Med Pharm. 2023;5:1677-80.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. , , , , , , et al. Navigating Cardiovascular Risk and Lipid Management in Indian Patients: Key Messages from the Lipid Association of India 2024 Consensus Statement IV. J Assoc Physicians India. 2024;72:80-2.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. , , , , , . Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Rheumatoid Arthritis in India. J Rheumatol. 2006;33:244-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. , , , , , , et al. Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis by Utilizing Carotid Intima-Media Thickness as a Surrogate Marker. Indian J Med Res. 2014;140:379-86.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. , , , . Correlation of Serum Vitamin D and High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol Levels With Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Single-Center Experience From Eastern India. Cureus. 2024;16:e69333.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections