Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstracts
Cardiovascular, Case Report
Cardiovascular, Commentary
Cardiovascular, Editorial
Cardiovascular, Guest Editorial
Cardiovascular, Images in Cardiology
Cardiovascular, Interventional Round
Cardiovascular, Original Article
Cardiovascular, Perspective Review
Cardiovascular, Preface
Cardiovascular, Review Article
Cardiovascular, Student’s Corner
Case Report
Case Report, Cardiovascular
Case Reports
Case Series, Cardiovascular
Clinical Discussion
Clinical Rounds
CPC
Current Issue
Debate
Dedication
Editorial
Editorial Cardiovascular
Editorial, From the Publisher’s Desk
Expert Comments
Expert's Opinion
Genetic Autopsy
Genetics Autopsy
Guest Editorial, Cardiovascular
Image in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology, Cardiovascular
Interventional Round
Interventional Round, Cardiovascular
Interventional Rounds
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Media and news
Original Article
Original Article, Cardiovascular
Original Article, Cardiovascular Health
Practice in Medicine
Preface
Review Article
Review Article, Cardiovascular
Scientific Paper
Short Communication
Student's Corner
Supplementary
Supplemetary
WINCARS Activities
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstracts
Cardiovascular, Case Report
Cardiovascular, Commentary
Cardiovascular, Editorial
Cardiovascular, Guest Editorial
Cardiovascular, Images in Cardiology
Cardiovascular, Interventional Round
Cardiovascular, Original Article
Cardiovascular, Perspective Review
Cardiovascular, Preface
Cardiovascular, Review Article
Cardiovascular, Student’s Corner
Case Report
Case Report, Cardiovascular
Case Reports
Case Series, Cardiovascular
Clinical Discussion
Clinical Rounds
CPC
Current Issue
Debate
Dedication
Editorial
Editorial Cardiovascular
Editorial, From the Publisher’s Desk
Expert Comments
Expert's Opinion
Genetic Autopsy
Genetics Autopsy
Guest Editorial, Cardiovascular
Image in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology, Cardiovascular
Interventional Round
Interventional Round, Cardiovascular
Interventional Rounds
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Media and news
Original Article
Original Article, Cardiovascular
Original Article, Cardiovascular Health
Practice in Medicine
Preface
Review Article
Review Article, Cardiovascular
Scientific Paper
Short Communication
Student's Corner
Supplementary
Supplemetary
WINCARS Activities
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstracts
Cardiovascular, Case Report
Cardiovascular, Commentary
Cardiovascular, Editorial
Cardiovascular, Guest Editorial
Cardiovascular, Images in Cardiology
Cardiovascular, Interventional Round
Cardiovascular, Original Article
Cardiovascular, Perspective Review
Cardiovascular, Preface
Cardiovascular, Review Article
Cardiovascular, Student’s Corner
Case Report
Case Report, Cardiovascular
Case Reports
Case Series, Cardiovascular
Clinical Discussion
Clinical Rounds
CPC
Current Issue
Debate
Dedication
Editorial
Editorial Cardiovascular
Editorial, From the Publisher’s Desk
Expert Comments
Expert's Opinion
Genetic Autopsy
Genetics Autopsy
Guest Editorial, Cardiovascular
Image in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology
Images in Cardiology, Cardiovascular
Interventional Round
Interventional Round, Cardiovascular
Interventional Rounds
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Media and news
Original Article
Original Article, Cardiovascular
Original Article, Cardiovascular Health
Practice in Medicine
Preface
Review Article
Review Article, Cardiovascular
Scientific Paper
Short Communication
Student's Corner
Supplementary
Supplemetary
WINCARS Activities
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
02 (
03
); 021-024
doi:
10.1055/s-0037-1607271

Comparable Periprocedural Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Male and Female Patients with Type C Lesions

Department of Cardiology, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences (NIMS), Punjagutta, Hyderabad, India

N. Dhananjaneya Reddy, MBBS, MD Department of Cardiology, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences (NIMS) Punjagutta, Hyderabad 500082 India danni.reddy@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Women in Cardiology and Related Sciences and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Abstract

Background Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in type C lesions has low success and has high procedural risk. We aimed at studying the outcomes of PCI in patients with type C lesions.

Material and Methods Total 180 patients with type C lesions who underwent PCI from January 2007 to December 2014 were taken into study and analyzed.

Results Of 180 patients, 141(78.3%) were males and 39 (21.7%) were females. Mean hemoglobin concentration, mean serum triglycerides, and mean estimated glomerular filtration rate were significantly lower in females compared with males. Seventy-seven (42.8%) patients had lesions in right coronary artery, 67 (37.2%) had lesions in left anterior descending coronary artery, 31 (17.2%) had lesions in left circumflex artery, and 5 (2.8%) had left main coronary artery disease. Complex lesions were common in males. Chronic total occlusion (CTO) was found in 140 cases and other than CTO of type C lesions in 40 patients. Predilatation was done in 169 (93.9%) patients. Successful PCI was done in 157 (87.2%) patients. Lesion could not be crossed in 11 (6.1%) patients. Only plain old balloon angioplasty could be done in 9 (5%) patients. Other complications occurred in 3 (1.67%) patients. There was no difference between female and male patients in requiring predilatation or crossing the lesion or in not being able to deliver the stent.

Conclusion PCI success rate among patients with type C lesions was 87.2% with low-complication rate in the present era. There was no difference in between female and male patients in success rate or complications.

Keywords

acute coronary syndrome
percutaneous coronary intervention
type C lesions

Introduction

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a reliable and effective therapeutic option for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and has become one of the most widely applied treatments in present-day cardiology. Type C coronary lesions represent a complex angiographic scenario, although they are rather common in the daily clinical practice of PCI. This article is aimed to report the outcomes of PCIs performed in patients with type C lesions.

Materials and Methods

It is an observational study of 180 patients with type C lesions who underwent PCI were taken into study and analyzed. Data were collected from records of our institute from January 2007 to December 2014. We collected the demographics data, clinical presentation, electrocardiographic (ECG) and two-dimensional (2D) echocardiographic findings, and details of coronary angiography (CAG) and PCI with in-hospital events.

Definition of type C lesion: Lesions with type C are > 20 mm diffuse, excessive tortuosity of proximal segment, extremely angulated segments, ≥ 90 degrees, total occlusion > 3 months old and/or bridging collaterals, inability to protect major side branches, degenerated vein graft with friable lesions as per American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines.1

PCI success may be defined by angiographic, procedural, and clinical criteria. Angiographic success in a stented artery is defined as minimum stenosis diameter reduction to < 20%. The definition of procedural success is angiographic success without in-hospital major clinical complications (e.g., death, myocardial infarction [MI], emergency coronary artery bypass surgery) during hospitalization. Clinical success is defined as anatomical and procedural success with relief of signs and/or symptoms of myocardial ischemia after recovery from the procedure. The long-term clinical success requires that the patient have persistent relief of signs and symptoms of myocardial ischemia for > 6 months.2

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with Minitab statistical software (Minitab Inc., Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States). The study population was subdivided into two groups according to sex: males and females. Continuous parameters are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and compared using the t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test as appropriate. Nominal parameters are presented as percentages and compared using Fischer's exact test. Differences were statistically significant when the respective p values were < 0.05.

Results

A total of 180 patients with type C lesions who underwent PCI were included in the study, of whom, 141 (78.3%) were males and 39 (21.7%) were females. Mean age of presentation was slightly more in females compared with males (58.7 ± 10.6 vs. 56.1 ± 10.9; p = 0.17). The prevalence of hypertension and diabetes was greater in females compared with males. Smoking history was present in 32% of males and only 2.6% of females (p = 0.00). The presentation of patients, that is, chronic stable angina (CSA) versus acute coronary syndrome (ACS) among males was 51.7% versus 48.3% whereas in females it was 35.8% versus 64.2%. Left ventricular (LV) dysfunction was present more in males compared with females, which is not statistically significant (44.6% vs. 35.8%; p = 0.31). History of prior PCI was present in 9.2% of males and 12.5% of females (p = 0.54). History of prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was present in 10.6% of males and 2.56% of females (p = 0.02) (Table 1, Fig. 1).

Fig. 1 Bar diagram showing the differences in historical parameters (percentages) in both sexes. CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; CSA, chronic stable angina.

Fig. 1 Bar diagram showing the differences in historical parameters (percentages) in both sexes. CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; CSA, chronic stable angina.

Table 1
Baseline characteristics of male and female PCI done patients

Variable

Males

Females

p Value

No. of cases

141 (78.3%)

39 (21.7%)

Age (y)

56.1 ± 10.9

58.7 ± 10.6

0.17

HTN (%)

86 (60.9%)

28 (71.7%)

0.19

DM (%)

56 (39.7%)

19 (48.7%)

0.31

Smoking (%)

45 (31.9%)

1 (2.56%)

0.000

CSA (%)

73 (51.7%)

14 (35.8%)

0.07

LV dysfunction (%)

63 (44.6%)

14 (35.8%)

0.31

Prior PCI (%)

13 (9.2%)

5 (12.8%)

0.54

Prior CABG (%)

15 (10.6%)

1 (2.56%)

0.02

Abbreviations: CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; CSA, chronic stable angina; DM, diabetes mellitus; HTN, hypertension; LV, left ventricular; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.

Mean hemoglobin concentration (in mg/dL) was less in females compared with males (11.44 ± 1.83 vs. 13.11 ± 2.06; p = 0.00). Lipid profile levels were almost comparable between males and females except for serum triglycerides (in mg/dL), which were significantly higher in males compared with females (155.4 ± 68.6 vs. 84.67 ± 8.14; p value = 0.01). Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (in mL/min/1.73 m2) was also significantly lower in females compared with males (73.9 ± 25.1 vs. 96.8 ± 26.4, p value = 0.00) (Table 2).

Table 2
Comparison of laboratory parameters in male and female patients

Variable

Males (Mean ± SD)

Females (Mean ± SD)

p Value

Systolic BP (mm Hg)

138.6 ± 27.2

140.8 ± 29.0

0.67

Diastolic BP (mm Hg)

78.0 ± 11.0

79.0 ± 13.5

0.69

Hemoglobin (mg/dL)

13.11 ± 2.06

11.44 ± 1.83

0.000

Packed cell volume (%)

39.06 ± 6.12

34.33 ± 5.22

0.000

Platelet count (lakh/mm3)

2.418 ± 0.813

2.467 ± 0.822

0.74

RBS (mg/dL)

148.7 ± 71.6

157.9 ± 65.6

0.44

Total cholesterol (mg/dL)

153.9 ± 50.1

138.3 ± 23.6

0.48

HDL (mg/dL)

39.5 ± 10.4

45.7 ± 12.9

0.52

LDL (mg/dL)

80.8 ± 41.5

75.7 ± 11.5

0.73

Triglycerides (mg/dL)

155.4 ± 68.6

84.67 ± 8.14

0.011

eGFR (mL/mim/1.73 m2)

96.8 ± 26.4

73.9 ± 25.1

0.000

Abbreviations: BP, blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; RBS, random blood sugar; SD, standard deviation.

Seventy-seven (42.8%) patients had lesions in the right coronary artery (RCA), 67 (37.2%) had lesions in the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery, 31(17.2%) had lesions in the left circumflex artery (LCx), and 5 (2.8%) had disease in the left main coronary artery (LMCA). Ostial lesion was found in 31 patients of whom nearly half (48.4%) had LAD lesion. Calcified lesions were more common in males compared with females although it is not statistically significant (22.6% vs. 15.3%; p = 0.28). Thrombus containing and bifurcation lesions were also more common in males. Ulcerated lesions were also more common in males than females (18.4% vs. 7.6%, p = 0.04) (Table 3, Fig. 2). Chronic total occlusion (CTO) was found in 140 cases and other than CTO type C lesions in 40 patients. CTO PCI was done more in female patients (75% vs. 87.5%, p = 0.05).

Fig. 2 A clustered bar chart demonstrating comparable values of both sexes across a coronary artery lesion characters.

Fig. 2 A clustered bar chart demonstrating comparable values of both sexes across a coronary artery lesion characters.

Table 3
Lesion characteristics

Variables

Males

Females

p Value

Ostial description

21 (14.8%)

10 (25.6%)

0.15

Calcification description

32 (22.6%)

6 (15.3%)

0.28

Thrombus description

21 (14.8%)

3 (7.6%)

0.16

Ulcer lesion

26 (18.4%)

3 (7.6%)

0.04

Bifurcation lesion description

21 (14.8%)

3 (7.6%)

0.16

CTO

105 (75%)

35 (87.5%)

0.05

Abbreviation: CTO, chronic total occlusion.

Successful PCI was done in 157 (87.2%) patients. Predilatation was done in 169 (93.9%) patients. Lesion could not be crossed in 11 (6.1%) patients. Only plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) was done in 9 (5%) patients (Table 4) as stent could not be delivered. Other complications occurred in 3 (1.67%) patients (details are given as follows). There was no difference between female and male patients in requiring predilatation or crossing the lesion or not able to deliver the stent.

Table 4
Final periprocedural result in study population

Result

Number of cases (%)

Successful PCI

157 (87.2%)

Could not cross the lesion

11 (6.1%)

Only POBA

9 (5%)

Other periprocedural complications

3 (1.6%)

Abbreviations: PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; POBA, plain old balloon angioplasty.

Three (1.6%) patients had other complications. One patient succumbed to death due to access site hematoma and contrast-induced nephropathy. One patient developed complete heart block (CHB) and cardiogenic shock. One patient developed dissection of the vessel, and wire could not be crossed, which led to abandoning of procedure (Table 4 shows this case as failure to cross the lesion). One patient had underexpansion of stent. However, with subsequent NC high-pressure dilatation, stent expanded well. One patient had pinching of diagonal after stent deployment, which could not be stented (Table 5).

Table 5
Other periprocedural complications of study population

Event

Number of cases (%)

Deatha

1 (0.5%)

Hematomaa

1 (0.5%)

Contrast-induced nephropathya

1 (0.5%)

CHBa

1 (0.5%)

Cardiogenic shocka

1 (0.5%)

Coronary artery dissectionb

1 (0.5%)

Pinching of diagonal

1 (0.5%)

All events occurred in the same patient.
Same patient had failure to cross the lesion.

Discussion

Traditionally type C lesions have a low success rate of < 60% and have a high risk.1 The success rate for type C lesions in our study is 87.2%. Ellis et al3 evaluated these criteria in > 1,000 lesions from the Multi-vessel Angioplasty Prognostic study. They found that angulated stenosis, high-grade stenosis, CTO lesions, bifurcation stenosis, and male sex were associated with reduced success rates; the other factors in the AHA/ACC system were not predictive. Overall angiographic success occurred in just 82.6% of patients, reflecting the state of the art of that era. They confirmed the usefulness of the ACC/AHA classification for predicting success in general but found that actual rates of success ranged from 92% for type A lesions to 60% for type C lesions.

Tan et al4 performed a careful prospective evaluation of 729 patients, using two independent observers unaware of PCI outcome at the time of the lesion. Type C characteristics had a success rate ranging from 57 to 88% and an abrupt closure rate ranging from 0 to 16%. Longer lesions, calcified lesions, diameter stenosis of 80 to 99%, and presence of thrombus were predictive of a lower success rate. Longer lesions, angulated lesions, diameter stenosis of 80 to 99%, and calcified lesions were predicted an abrupt closure. The investigators concluded that the AHA/ACC classification scheme was “outdated and needed to be changed for application in current angioplasty practice.”

Zaacks et al5 6 evaluating patients angioplastied from 1994 to 1996 in a single center showed that the success rates with class C lesions was 88.2%. Krone et al7 showed a success rate of 84.1% for type C lesions.

In PROGRESS CTO (Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention), factors for prediction of periprocedural complications in CTO PCI were studied.8 Three factors were independent predictors of complications and were included in the score: patient age > 65 years, +3 points (odds ratio [OR] = 4.85, confidence interval [CI]: 1.82–16.77); lesion length ≥ 23 mm, +2 points (OR = 3.22, CI: 1.08–13.89); and use of the retrograde approach +1 point (OR = 2.41, CI: 1.04–6.05). Christopoulos et al used J-CTO score for prediction of periprocedural complications in CTO PCI.9 In the present study, we evaluated the clinical profile, procedural details, and the success rate of PCI of patients with type C coronary lesions, which included the CTO and type C lesions other than CTO.

In the present era, the success of PCI in type C lesions is improved to 90 to 92%.8 9 However, there are limited studies comparing the periprocedural outcomes between male and female patients. In our study, in females the most common mode of presentation is ACS whereas in males the presentation of CSA or ACS is nearly equal. Mean triglyceride levels were more in males compared with females. Mean hemoglobin concentration was low in females. Mean eGFR was lower in females compared with males. Complex lesions were more common among males. Complication rate was also low with success rate of 87.5% in the present study. There was no difference in periprocedural complications between the female and male patients.

Conclusion

PCI of type C lesions presented a good success rates and low complication rates in both females and males and are comparable.

References

  1. , , , et al. . Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty) Circulation. 1988;78(02):486-502.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , et al , . ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention—summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) Circulation. 2006;113(01):156-175.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , et al , . Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease. Implications for patient selection. Circulation. 1990;82(04):1193-1202.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , . Clinical and lesion morphologic determinants of coronary angioplasty success and complications: current experience. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25(04):855-865.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , et al. . Value of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association stenosis morphology classification for coronary interventions in the late 1990s. Am J Cardiol. 1998;82(01):43-49.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , . The AHA/ACC task force criteria: what is its value in the device era? American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1998;43(01):9-10.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , et al , . A simplified lesion classification for predicting success and complications of coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 2000;85(10):1179-1184.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , et al. . Development and validation of a scoring system for predicting periprocedural complications during percutaneous coronary interventions of chronic total occlusions: the Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention (PROGRESS CTO) Complications Score. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(10):e004272.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , et al. . Clinical Utility of the Japan-Chronic Total Occlusion Score in Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion Interventions: results from a multicenter registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(07):e002171.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections